Lilith
08-23-2004, 10:21 PM
Can someone please explain to me why half-life is independent of concentration for all first order reaction? What about 2nd order?
Thanks.
Thanks.
|
View Full Version : Half-life question Lilith 08-23-2004, 10:21 PM Can someone please explain to me why half-life is independent of concentration for all first order reaction? What about 2nd order? Thanks. drusier 08-23-2004, 10:24 PM half life 2 got pushed back again (~nov 1st so says amazon.com) HBomb 08-23-2004, 10:59 PM I had to bust out my Chem 1 book but it ain't gonna be the answer you want to hear (or maybe it is). First, the derivation from Rate = k[A] to the equation of half life requires calculus. So the good news it that part is out of scope. Now, using calculus, for first order reactions, you get: ln([A(t)]/[A(o)] = -kt where [A(t)] is conc at time t and [A(o)] is orig conc Then half life occurs when [A(t)] = (1/2)[A(o)] because we are looking for half-life afterall Plug and solve, you get: ln(1/2) = -kt ln(2) = kt t = ln(2)/k So, for first order rxns the half life is t = ln(2)/k which is independent of concentration [A]!!! FYI, Second order half lives are out of scope (because it is much harder). It is also derived using calculus. Should I go over it too? Well, start with Rate = k[A]^2 and you can derive the following using calculus: 1/[A(t)] - 1/[A(o)] = kt Solve for half life where [A(t)] = (1/2)[A(o)], you get: t = 1/{k[A(o)]} So for 2nd order half life, time is dependent on concentration. Again, 2nd order half life is OUT OF SCOPE for the DAT. Hope this helps. Sorry if I lost you...it is a bit hard to explain. I'd recommend reading up on a Chem text for more context if this didn't make sense. Lilith 08-23-2004, 11:18 PM Thanks HBomb!!! |