I'm sure its been posted before, but...

any comments on the quantity of g.anat compared to neuro anat---and biochem?

all opinions welcomed

thanks,
joe

The review books I have been reading have been saying biochem>neuroanat>anatomy. Most books list anatomy as a "low yield" subject to study.

i've heard the same...

A friend just told me that she had only 3 pure anatomy questions on her exam and about 5 radiographs. She approximated her biochem at about 10%, whereas Path was around 50%.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by joeG:
<strong>i've heard the same...

A friend just told me that she had only 3 pure anatomy questions on her exam and about 5 radiographs. She approximated her biochem at about 10%, whereas Path was around 50%.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">10% BIOCHEM!!! That's 35 questions!!! I'm screwed...I definitely don't know 35 questions worth of biochem.

I know a guy that had a ton of histology on his test. Guess what the last book he looked at was...a histo atlas...lucky bastard.