theedaddy77
06-18-2008, 10:36 PM
number 174.... not an acetal cause an acteal would have a H on carbon at it shows one bonded to two -OR groups and 2 -R groups.. so a mistake
|
View Full Version : mistake with destroyer theedaddy77 06-18-2008, 10:36 PM number 174.... not an acetal cause an acteal would have a H on carbon at it shows one bonded to two -OR groups and 2 -R groups.. so a mistake Dmitry Malayev 06-19-2008, 07:25 AM Actually it's not wrong. The generic form of an Acetal used to be considered as you mentioned or as displayed below: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/Generic_Acetal.png But many have interpreted today that an Acetal can be considered a Carbon bonded with 2-OR groups and 2-R groups. Which in fact is a Ketal as shown below: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Generic_Ketal.png But todays terminology in Organic Chemistry all ketals are classified under a subset of Acetals. So in fact the answer is correct. It's a trick question but nothing wrong with it. |