![]() |
Bad at NBME... good at UW?
I have a little more than 2 weeks for my exam, so if anyone can give me any suggestions on what might be causing this problem, I'd be very appreciative.
I seem to be doing disproportionately well on UW and UW-style questions. My typical UW average for a timed, random block is usually 70-80%. Similarly, when I took the UWSA1, I got around 76% which translated to a 250+. However, a week ago, I took the NBME 11 and I got a 224. Granted, I studied hard during that one week (finished up the remainder of my organ systems... so maybe around 3 or 4 organ systems?), but even taking into account that UWSA typically overpredicts by around 10 points, that's still a very pronounced discrepancy. Obviously, the NBME is the better predictor at performance on the real thing, but for whatever reason I just don't do as well on the NBMEs. What do you guys suggest I do? |
Quote:
I'd concentrate on making sure you know all the memorization tables in First Aid, Bugs, drugs, interactions, etc. if you're having a similar problem. |
I feel the same way I got 193/380 on NBME 5 with 142/200 when i checked my answers offline. Thats 71% which means you need greater than 72% just to break a 200 on the NBMEs, why are the curves insane and is that how we should expect the real exam to be?
|
Yea the curve on NBME (and the real thing) is insane. I believe you need around 80% correct for 220
|
Quote:
|
There's some pattern to the way UWorld asks certain stuff and after a while you start to pick up on certain things. I think what makes the NBME difficult is that there is no pattern and the curve is very strict
|
same thing here...Doing 80s on UW, but getting avg on NBME due to their curve. You have to get like 90% on NBME to reach 240-250 based on their scale..
|
I'm kind of the opposite... my UWorld average is definitely lower than what I would like, and I am doing better on the NBMEs than that average would suggest. Does that mean I'm in trouble for the real thing? I'm hoping it just means I'm learning by doing questions.
|
to start Uworld 1: 221
1 week in NMBE13: 210 2 weeks in Uworld 2: 242 I'm gonna hope and pray Uworld is more predictive but I really think it has a lot to do with which test you got |
I did about 26 pts worse on nbme 11 than i did on the other nbmes, if that is worth ne thing. Anyway, trust U world more. I took the step 1 exam today. GRUELING. And somehow, it was WAYYY more like UWORLD than the nbmes. Like wtf???
|
but let me qualify that by saying that the UWSAs over predict, especially number 2
|
man that sucks lol. I am taking it tomorrow o_O. gonna come back mad tired
|
When you get your score id be interested to see if your uworld qbank was a better predictor cause I'm in the same boat right now and according to other posts nbme is pretty dead on. But then others say if you can do uworld you'll be fine and that the real exam was easier than uworld. I dunno maybe cause I have my font on large with uworld I find it less grueling to read through the questions than wit nbme screen. For some reason my eyes get so fatigued and strained from reading those questions. Like I have glasses but that doesn't seem to help lol.
|
ahh finally took an another NBME and went up by 25 points. I find that the reason NBME seems harder than UW is because those extra 4 questions at the end. I'm always feeling like I'm running out of time and rushing. On the real USMLE, it's going to be 46 qs in 1 hour though, exactly like UW.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:29 AM. |