Originally Posted by PADPM
This requirement to provide an interpreter is part of the American Civil Disabilities Act. I'm not saying these patients don't require/need/deserve an interpreter, I just think it's absurd that the doctor has to cover the cost.
I'll say it: These patients don't deserve an interpreter. I don't understand how you have to use your personal property to pay for their mishap...
Can you refuse treatment to this patient? Or is that illegal too?