|
|||||||
| Psychiatry For psychiatry residents and students interested in psychiatry. Co-hosted with The AAP. | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Still in California
|
I thought it might be helpful to the Class of 2012 and future medical students to start a thread about how to research programs of interest as they prepare to apply.
I've gotten a few PMs and have seen threads and posts from folks who don't seem aware of how to go about learning some of the basics about different programs for themselves. I'll kick it off, but I'm hoping if anyone else has a few tips of how to go about researching potential residency programs, we might be able to help future applicants make more informed decisions and cut down on the "How heavy is UCI's call schedule?" threads. Post your tips now, while they're still top of mind. Last edited by notdeadyet; 03-24-2011 at 08:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Still in California
|
FREIDA allows you to search for basic information about Psychiatry residencies using different criteria. You can get a list by location (state or region), subspecialty (combined programs and fellowships), or any combination thereof. You can also filter by things such as a academic vs. community environment and class size.
FREIDA is a great place to come up with an initial list of options of programs in areas you'd consider living that have fellowships you're interested in available in an environment you'd enjoy working. This is a good first step to get a list of potential programs as well as URLs for their web-sites. Note: FREIDA sometimes has out-of-date information and anything you learn here needs to be validated elsewhere. Some are pretty glaring (such as fellowships that no longer exist). But it's a good first step to make sure you don't overlook programs that would be great for you just because they don't get a lot of airplay on SDN or at your medical school. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Still in California
|
After coming up with a few programs you're interested in, please don't immediately email folks or start threads with questions like "What do you think about Acme University? Specifically, I'm wondering about class size, pay, benefits, location, rents, psychopharm, psychotherapy, fellowship opportunities, faculty involvement, etc."
Every year, students are asked to post their impressions of different programs after going through the interview process on the Interview Review threads (though with less participation each year... editorializing...). For each program, posters list things such as:
These threads are goldmines not just for programs you're considering, but also to get an idea of the range of possibilities. A single post on Acme University is helpful, but reading through what folks have to say about other programs, you get an idea of the what's out there by which to compare Acme. Below are the links to the last three years of Interview Review threads:There are older review threads as well, but I'd caution against reaching too far back, as you'll possibly get pretty out-of-date information. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Still in California
|
After whetting your appetite with reading review(s) about your program, consider going to the Psychiatry Forum on SDN and doing a targeted search:
Doing the above will produce a page of anything that had Acme in the thread title. Expect lots of "Acme vs. Standard U vs. Backwater Community???" and the like. Tips:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Still in California
|
Yes, the information might be heavy on marketing-speak. Yes, the information might be old. Yes, the quality of the website is no indication of the quality of the program. But you'll find answers to a majority of your questions just by looking at each program's website itself and browsing through each page. Shouldn't take more than 15 or 20 minutes for each program.
You may be surprised by what you find and it may very well alter your decision on whether or not to apply a program or to do so intelligently. Did you know OHSU has an Intercultural Psychiatric Program that has a pretty cutting edge approach to dealing with culturally sensitive treatment of immigrant and refugee communities? I didn't, and didn't expect to see something this in fairly-white Oregon. Discovering this excited me about the program and turned a program that I might have not applied to at all into one that ended up near the top of my ROL. Did you know that UCSF will not rank you unless you are able to submit proof that you completed and passed all of your Step 1/2? I didn't. Learning this ahead of time allowed me to schedule my Step 2 CS early enough to ensure that results were back in time. Several SDNers did not know this and could not rank what might have been their dream school. SDN is a great source of information, but it's no substitute for going to the horse's mouth as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
1K Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Still in California
|
Deleted, bad info, apologies....
Last edited by notdeadyet; 03-25-2011 at 10:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Still in California
|
Ack. You're right. I was looking at date the program information was updated, not the reviews themselves. Scratch that.
I still didn't find many recent program reviews in the ones I was looking at, but it looks as if scutworks is still breathing, albeit shallowly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
|
I think there's a huge difference between giving an honest review of a program -- highlighting strengths and weaknesses -- and coming out and bashing programs. I don't think 'program bashing' is synonymous with 'program review' in the context of this thread. Also, I'd venture to guess that more people than not are content with their program, so when people say reviewing programs on scutwork it doesn't mean airing dirty laundry. There are plenty of good things about programs that I'd like to hear, not just the bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
|
A little bit more than if there were no review at all. Plus, there'd be a lack of information posted at bad programs, which would be somewhat telling. This is assuming a lot of people give reviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
That's not possible without people giving feedback. And sometimes the information was so sparse (circa 2002) that it could hardly be measured accurately. But. Even faced with the apparent paucity of information. And wishing there was more of it. I still understand why it is what it is. Medical hierarchy is just not interested in the opinion of it's interns. Actively disinterested in my opinion. I'm not calling anyone's bets in that situation. And am surprised when people do. Interested and grateful. But surprised at the cajones. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Still in California
|
Quote:
Most of the places I interviewed at, the residents seemed pretty open about discussing and even bringing up the biggest challenges a given residency program (this is a typical question to ask). If they aren't, this is a red flag of someplace that's probably unpleasant to work. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
One of the things I liked about the programs on the top of my rank list, especially the top ones were that I felt that I learned exactly what I was getting into and am excited about that. I can tell you my perceptions of programs I reviewed online and then went to see in person were occasionally very different in both good and bad ways. But enough derailing here. A piece of advice I would give is to research where previous med students from your school have gone. If they did a good job it can give you a little boost and also give you some conversation starters. Also find out where all your attendings at your home school trained. They can give you feedback about the program and may still have solid connections to the program. My mentor trained at my future residency and gave me invaluable feedback about what to expect and also made some extra calls that helped me land a spot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
|
to get back to the thread topic...
psych really is a buyers market. i have a decent application and got 12 out of 12 interviews from places all over the country with very different teaching goals. i am very glad i took so many interviews so i could contrast them and see what programs i really like. a few points to think about... 1. location- not only where you want to live, but also, what are the patients like? the demographics in houston are very different from boston. 2. research money- i am not into research but interviewed at some heavy-hitter programs. none of the places i looked force research on their residents but the funding speaks to the reputation and contribution of the faculty 3. resident vibes- at the dinner its pretty easy to see where you'll fit in 4. pharm vs. therapy- some places have a focus on one or the other while most are based in GME guidelines. good to know this going in. Last edited by mkeguy; 02-10-2012 at 05:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
|
How can one tell which programs are focused on academics, research or community mental health? I'm looking for a program that has bits of all 3, but is not focused on primarily research, for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
|
try looking for their website, scutwork, or just emailing one of the residents there and asking them
__________________
Ice C ![]() L.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Otherwise, you can get a snapshot of programs from SDN reviews, and there is good information out there but you do have to actively filter out based on who is the writer. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:52 PM.











Hybrid Mode

