Go Back   Student Doctor Network Forums > Pharmacy Forums [ PharmD ] > Pharmacy

Pharmacy For current PharmD students and practitioners. RSS: Feed Icon


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2012, 02:56 PM   #1
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
CSI:SDN Target 65% tech hour cuts for the new year. Not a good time to work for Target.


SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)

Target 65% tech hour cuts for the new year. Not a good time to work for Target. Just don't my friends.
Actually, I have no idea how they figure this out as 65%.
It looks like every store is getting different cuts even when they started out with the same hours.
40hrs -----> 24-28 hrs ; 30hrs -----> 17-18 hrs; 20hrs -----> 5hrs; 10 hrs ------> 0


That is our new year so called "staffing guidelines" at Target. Pharmacies that are doing less than 650 per week will have their tech hour cut. About 10 pharmacies will down to zero tech hour. Some stores are only given 2 tech hours a week. Why on earth would someone want to keep a 2 hour a week job, and no one would want to be trained to become a tech for a 2 hour a WEEK job. SERIOUSLY

Oh, and our only pharmacist supervisors (Business Partners) had no say in this whatsoever. I find this very insulting. They basically think we are worthless, and only do two hours worth of work a week. I am answering stupid store customer questions for the store two hours a DAY. Where is the restroom? Where are the Q-tips? While answering all those meaningless questions, I actually have to do everything in the pharmacy. Yes, we already work alone most of the day.

What can I say, it's a decision made by a business major who has never worked in a pharmacy and obviously doesn't know what it takes to run a pharmacy. This project is totally ignoring how the company believes that that pharmacy customers spend more money in the store than non-pharmacy customers. None of them was smart enough to shorten pharmacy open hours instead. They are just saving pennies this way to look good on paper.

Of course none of them is taking location into account. Someone up top in the company should have thought about this before putting pharmacies in all Target stores. If they decided to do that they should have predicted this. The strange thing is right now one store does less than 650 earns about 1 hour every 16 rx. The other store does more than 700 earns 1 hour every 8 rx. So the low volume store is being punished for bad/poor location and the company was the one who failed at marketing.

I hope all their good pharmacists quit. Or may be they just wanted to close those low volume stores in the first place. I guess I didn't escape the hell of retail/community/chain after all. Any ideas on how to put this business major son of a you know what back to idiotville?

Last edited by clachan3; 01-21-2012 at 12:26 PM.
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:30 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 41
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

65% cut? How did they justify such a drastic move? What is your current staffing model? This will give us a better understanding of how deep of a cut it is.
AminoAcid777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:38 PM   #3
more coffee please
 
joetrisman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tamping a shot
Posts: 1,607
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

This makes me sad. I had always heard great things about working there as a rph
joetrisman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:41 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 41
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

What about unionizing and going on strike!
AminoAcid777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:52 PM   #5
Super Member
 
KARM12's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East
Posts: 2,234
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AminoAcid777 View Post
What about unionizing and going on strike!
All the 2012 grads will swoop in and take your jobs!
KARM12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 04:01 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 79
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Yeah I would like to know the current staffing model as well. If you're doing less than 100 scripts per day with more than five Full Time Equivalent technicians, then I can't say I disagree with a 65% cut. So how many FTEs does the typical Target have? Also is it true you don't have drive thru's or are some Targets adding those in? Without a drive thru I think a pharmacist at a slow store only needs 1-2 technicians on any given day (but of course it depends on how "slow" the store is).
007rx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 04:32 PM   #7
SHC1984 <3
 
confettiflyer's Avatar
 
Status: Resident
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: west coast
Posts: 5,876
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AminoAcid777 View Post
What about unionizing and going on strike!
rofl...what is this, 1970?
confettiflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 03:28 AM   #8
I said HARPER'S, Lamar!
 
WVUPharm2007's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Born/Raised: Parkersburg, WV | Currently: Montgomery Township, Montgomery County, PA
Posts: 10,760
Pharmacist SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by confettiflyer View Post
rofl...what is this, 1970?
Ah, yes...back before the *******s with money brainwashed everyone into thinking an organized workforce is a bad thing.

Its a race to the bottom everywhere.

Also, if they cut your tech hours to 2 hours...and its a 65% cut...what did you get by on like 3 hours before?

Also, do you really need that much help if you are doing 100 a day? My day partners do 120/day by themselves on holidays...and then complain about how slow it was that day...
__________________
West Virginia University School of Pharmacy Alumnus

"The slurs stick to me, standing on these graves. Rednecks. Trailer-park trash. Racists. Cannon fodder. My ancestors. My people. Me." - from Born Fighting by Jim Webb
-------
Officially immune from the influence of any mod that joined after September 2006
WVUPharm2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:05 AM   #9
4K Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,148
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVUPharm2007 View Post
Ah, yes...back before the *******s with money brainwashed everyone into thinking an organized workforce is a bad thing.

Its a race to the bottom everywhere.

Also, if they cut your tech hours to 2 hours...and its a 65% cut...what did you get by on like 3 hours before?

Also, do you really need that much help if you are doing 100 a day? My day partners do 120/day by themselves on holidays...and then complain about how slow it was that day...
Target customers are supposedly needy. For example, if you are expected to explain to them where everything in the store is and/or walk out with them to find items, then 2 tech hours per day is rough. Or how about the "orgigami" label and leaflet folds?
PharmDstudent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:27 AM   #10
Go suck on a Zoloft.
 
ethyl's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 857
Pharmacist SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

650 scripts a week at most other retailers would have the pharmacist working alone. The only surprise is how they didn't make this cut earlier.
ethyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:22 AM   #11
4K Member
 
MountainPharmD's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,174
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clachan3 View Post

Targe



What can I say, it's a decision made by a business major who has never worked in a pharmacy and obviously doesn't know what it takes to run a pharmacy. This project is totally ignoring how the company believes that that pharmacy customers spend more money in the store than non-pharmacy customers. None of them was smart enough to shorten pharmacy open hours instead. They are just saving pennies this way to look good on paper.

I hope all their good pharmacists quit. Or may be they just wanted to close those low volume stores in the first place. I guess I didn't escape the hell of retail/community/chain after all. Any ideas on how to put this business major son of a you know what back to idiotville?
Welcome to the reality most of us have been dealing with for years. Target is now no different than every other chain.

If all the good pharmacists quit where would they go? Its just as bad if not worse at the other chains. You want to know real pharmacy hell? Get a job at CVS.

Honestly, I have been waiting for Target to pull out of the pharmacy business. They did it back 80's. For a business like Target that is barely in the pharmcy business anyway the liability and shrinking profit are not worth it.
__________________
Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty I am free at last!
MountainPharmD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:24 AM   #12
4K Member
 
MountainPharmD's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,174
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AminoAcid777 View Post
What about unionizing and going on strike!
Yeah, go on strike for the two hours a week you are scheduled. That will bring them to thier knees!
MountainPharmD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:31 AM   #13
more coffee please
 
joetrisman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tamping a shot
Posts: 1,607
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainPharmD View Post
Welcome to the reality most of us have been dealing with for years. Target is now no different than every other chain.

If all the good pharmacists quit where would they go? Its just as bad if not worse at the other chains. You want to know real pharmacy hell? Get a job at CVS.

Honestly, I have been waiting for Target to pull out of the pharmacy business. They did it back 80's. For a business like Target that is barely in the pharmcy business anyway the liability and shrinking profit are not worth it.
But this might mean no more ultra cool wedge shaped pill bottles in the future
joetrisman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 10:38 AM   #14
I said HARPER'S, Lamar!
 
WVUPharm2007's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Born/Raised: Parkersburg, WV | Currently: Montgomery Township, Montgomery County, PA
Posts: 10,760
Pharmacist SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Retail is pretty much the same anywhere.

The only place I'd leave my job for is Costco/Sam's.
WVUPharm2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:47 AM   #15
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 007rx View Post
Yeah I would like to know the current staffing model as well. If you're doing less than 100 scripts per day with more than five Full Time Equivalent technicians, then I can't say I disagree with a 65% cut. So how many FTEs does the typical Target have? Also is it true you don't have drive thru's or are some Targets adding those in? Without a drive thru I think a pharmacist at a slow store only needs 1-2 technicians on any given day (but of course it depends on how "slow" the store is).
We are at 1 or 2 part-time techs right now.
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:49 AM   #16
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joetrisman View Post
But this might mean no more ultra cool wedge shaped pill bottles in the future
Honestly, I think that is one thing that drives our cost up
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:54 AM   #17
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVUPharm2007 View Post
Retail is pretty much the same anywhere.

The only place I'd leave my job for is Costco/Sam's.
I agree. I didn't expect Target to be that much better, but this has gone a little too far considering they are giving stores 2 hours a week.
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:55 AM   #18
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainPharmD View Post
Yeah, go on strike for the two hours a week you are scheduled. That will bring them to thier knees!
Sounds like fun, but I'm usually too nice to say no to my patients.
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 12:02 PM   #19
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainPharmD View Post
Welcome to the reality most of us have been dealing with for years. Target is now no different than every other chain.

If all the good pharmacists quit where would they go? Its just as bad if not worse at the other chains. You want to know real pharmacy hell? Get a job at CVS.

Honestly, I have been waiting for Target to pull out of the pharmacy business. They did it back 80's. For a business like Target that is barely in the pharmcy business anyway the liability and shrinking profit are not worth it.
I did work at CVS, so I know real pharmacy hell then for 3 years actually. I really don't mind if they want to close our doors. Times are tough these days, some of us might have to take jobs that have nothing to do with pharmacy. I think part of this is Target doesn't want to be the company on the news for laying off people. They really should have hired the right people to consider the liability and shrinking profit before open their pharmacy doors
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 12:07 PM   #20
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ethyl View Post
650 scripts a week at most other retailers would have the pharmacist working alone. The only surprise is how they didn't make this cut earlier.
I cannot agree more. Only if they would make their pharmacies more closed off than how they are now. Being interrupted constantly by store customers, filling prescriptions with PDX, folding and labeling like origami, dealing with customers who refuse to show us their new year insurance cards (still want their rx bill through insurance) and oh, waiting on the stupid workbench to load crap....
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 12:22 PM   #21
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WVUPharm2007 View Post
Ah, yes...back before the *******s with money brainwashed everyone into thinking an organized workforce is a bad thing.

Its a race to the bottom everywhere.

Also, if they cut your tech hours to 2 hours...and its a 65% cut...what did you get by on like 3 hours before?

Also, do you really need that much help if you are doing 100 a day? My day partners do 120/day by themselves on holidays...and then complain about how slow it was that day...
Pharmacists work hours pass their scheduled shifts, that's how we do it. I don't think you work at Target, WVUPharm2007, but if I was using the CVS computers, I probably wouldn't complain as much.

Was it 120 per 12 hour Holiday shift? just wondering. I guess it would be a different story if we all work alone every single day week day or not, no matter how many scripts or problems we run into.

It would be really nice If all we do is just filling prescriptions, no phone answering, no managing inventory, no placing drug orders or putting orders away, no sudafed selling, no ringing up store customers, no cleaning/staying organized/basically let the pharmacy turn into a pigsty I would have been just fine.
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 12:27 PM   #22
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KARM12 View Post
All the 2012 grads will swoop in and take your jobs!
They probably would, as long as they work at a profitable store they would be fine I suppose
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 01:10 PM   #23
Protons and Pumps, Baby!
 
atpsynthase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 163
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clachan3 View Post

Target 65% tech hour cuts for the new year. Not a good time to work for Target. Just don't my friends.
Actually, I have no idea how they figure this out as 65%.
It looks like every store is getting different cuts even when they started out with the same hours.
40hrs -----> 24-28 hrs ; 30hrs -----> 17-18 hrs; 20hrs -----> 5hrs; 10 hrs ------> 0


That is our new year so called "staffing guidelines" at Target. Pharmacies that are doing less than 650 per week will have their tech hour cut. About 10 pharmacies will down to zero tech hour. Some stores are only given 2 tech hours a week. Why on earth would someone want to keep a 2 hour a week job, and no one would want to be trained to become a tech for a 2 hour a WEEK job. SERIOUSLY

Oh, and our only pharmacist supervisors (Business Partners) had no say in this whatsoever. I find this very insulting. They basically think we are worthless, and only do two hours worth of work a week. I am answering stupid store customer questions for the store two hours a DAY. Where is the restroom? Where are the Q-tips? While answering all those meaningless questions, I actually have to do everything in the pharmacy. Yes, we already work alone most of the day.

What can I say, it's a decision made by a business major who has never worked in a pharmacy and obviously doesn't know what it takes to run a pharmacy. This project is totally ignoring how the company believes that that pharmacy customers spend more money in the store than non-pharmacy customers. None of them was smart enough to shorten pharmacy open hours instead. They are just saving pennies this way to look good on paper.

Of course none of them is taking location into account. Someone up top in the company should have thought about this before putting pharmacies in all Target stores. If they decided to do that they should have predicted this. The strange thing is right now one store does less than 650 earns about 1 hour every 16 rx. The other store does more than 700 earns 1 hour every 8 rx. So the low volume store is being punished for bad/poor location and the company was the one who failed at marketing.

I hope all their good pharmacists quit. Or may be they just wanted to close those low volume stores in the first place. I guess I didn't escape the hell of retail/community/chain after all. Any ideas on how to put this business major son of a you know what back to idiotville?
Wow.. I'm guessing this has to do with the amount of transfers that the larger volume stores are receiving. We do about 2,100 per week and have gained quite a few tech hours based on the amount of transfers we have done since January 1, 2012.... quite possibly at expense from the lower volume stores.

And I hear new bottles and pink rings are coming sometime this year...
__________________
University of Minnesota
College of Pharmacy
Pharm.D. Class of 2015

Last edited by atpsynthase; 01-21-2012 at 01:23 PM.
atpsynthase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2012, 11:18 PM   #24
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 31
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

I work for target in the bay area. Other than the origami comments it seems like nobody here knows what they are talking about. All the stores I work at do well over 650 a week. We have also had a significant increase in our techs hours in response to the increased volume from wags transfers. There's plenty of good pharmacists working for target as well. I interned at CVS and Walmart and met some practicing nightmares there. Not that I would claim either doesn't have any good pharmacists.
indebtpharmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2012, 09:51 PM   #25
Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 281
SDN 10+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indebtpharmd View Post
I work for target in the bay area. Other than the origami comments it seems like nobody here knows what they are talking about. All the stores I work at do well over 650 a week. We have also had a significant increase in our techs hours in response to the increased volume from wags transfers. There's plenty of good pharmacists working for target as well. I interned at CVS and Walmart and met some practicing nightmares there. Not that I would claim either doesn't have any good pharmacists.
Such insightful comments. I'm glad you can speak for every Target pharmacy in the States. No one knows what they are talking about here. Target pharmacies that fill >650 do not get the same workload that low volume stores do. Try dividing the number rx by the number of tech hours, rx per hour is different for stores >650 versus <650. Or may be you've never looked into that because it doesn't affect your stores negatively.
clachan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 11:31 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 121
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Target work flow is drastically slower than CVS/Wags...300-400/day in Target is like working at an 800-1000 Rx store at CVS...the bagging, the checking, the computer layout, the tracking of Rx's throughout the process, just takes more time
Muse600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 09:20 PM   #27
I said HARPER'S, Lamar!
 
WVUPharm2007's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Born/Raised: Parkersburg, WV | Currently: Montgomery Township, Montgomery County, PA
Posts: 10,760
Pharmacist SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muse600 View Post
Target work flow is drastically slower than CVS/Wags...300-400/day in Target is like working at an 800-1000 Rx store at CVS...the bagging, the checking, the computer layout, the tracking of Rx's throughout the process, just takes more time
This I didn't know.

Interesting.

I imagine trying to put the pills in those stupid looking bottles takes more time, too.
WVUPharm2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 11:08 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 144
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muse600 View Post
Target work flow is drastically slower than CVS/Wags...300-400/day in Target is like working at an 800-1000 Rx store at CVS...the bagging, the checking, the computer layout, the tracking of Rx's throughout the process, just takes more time
haha this is so true, I did my IPPE at another chain that filled more prescriptions than target, but I had wayyyyy more down time at the other store... I guess target lost bunch $$ on that nightmare of window based computer system, and need to cut hours
Deja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 05:30 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
museabuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 603
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muse600 View Post
Target work flow is drastically slower than CVS/Wags...300-400/day in Target is like working at an 800-1000 Rx store at CVS...the bagging, the checking, the computer layout, the tracking of Rx's throughout the process, just takes more time
In a city where there is a Walgreen or Cvs or both on every corner I had no idea targets did over 200 rxs a day.
museabuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2012, 07:30 AM   #30
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 64
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Why do chains have such different standards?
Some groceries like Krogers and Randalls average 100 a day. And there's at least one tech for every pharmacist
gambit78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2012, 02:24 PM   #31
GabonpharmD
 
GabonpharmD's Avatar
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 298
Follow My Twitter SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainPharmD View Post
Yeah, go on strike for the two hours a week you are scheduled. That will bring them to thier knees!
__________________
I am no longer a Pharmacist. I am a manager of the metrics. Wait time, ready rate percentage, auto refill percentage, inventory to goal, out of stock percentage, and the performace board are my sole reason for living. My total value and worth as a Pharmacist and human being hang on making those metrics. Pray God you do not miss one because you will be written up and it will reflect poorly on your perfromance evaluation!!!!! Its all about the metrics baby is my credo.

I have not been around lately, but to come back and read your signature made my day. I am now a pic at shevs and feel exactly like that. Soon they are going to add text messaging metric. I run one of the best store in our district metric wise, so the pressure is high to keep it a "flag" store for our area.
__________________
The fabulous life of Dr GabonpharmD:

Born in Gabon, raised everywhere, pharmacist by trade, businesswoman in the making, full time mom/wife, caring friend, loving sister and daughter, busy life..God is my strength
GabonpharmD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2012, 06:33 PM   #32
2K Member
 
bacillus1's Avatar
 
Status: Resident
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,030
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deja View Post
haha this is so true, I did my IPPE at another chain that filled more prescriptions than target, but I had wayyyyy more down time at the other store... I guess target lost bunch $$ on that nightmare of window based computer system, and need to cut hours
I liked RedRx, though I only got to use it on the last day of my rotation at Target. Maybe that's just because I'm used to Windows based computer systems at the chain where I work.
bacillus1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2012, 11:52 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Status: Pharmacist
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 756

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AminoAcid777 View Post
What about unionizing and going on strike!
Unions in pharmacy is like a windbreaker during a tornado.
BenJammin is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Comments are closed.