|
|||||||
| MCAT Discussions Talk about the current MCAT, future tests, and study tactics. | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 91
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
I strongly recommend Chad's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
2K Member
|
I don't know anything about Chad's. WikiPremed is great for physics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 298
|
I would go with Chad, the guy can really teach gen chem well. I love it. And he teaches orgo well in my opinion (just haven't seen too many orgo videos). His physics is good also (but I prefer reading it, but a friend of mine loves his physics). In all honesty, its $100 for 3 months, and I treat his videos as my test prep company lectures and then work/read my tbr books and do passages. I think it was the best $100 I have ever spent, its a worthwhile investment. You can watch the free videos on his site to see if you like the way he lectures.
Just make sure you not sitting their watching 7 videos a day, its meant to be active learning, so take notes as you would in a real lecture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Try wikipremed first, since its free. If you like it, stick with it, if you don't then try chad's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Better Known as TXK
|
I go with wikipremed hands down. Absolutely awesome treatment of physics and chem. I like chad's too, he is great and GOOD at the lecture "mechanics". I just learn better in the context that wikiprmed offers
Last edited by TXKnight; 03-01-2012 at 08:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 57
|
Suppose that someone doesn't take notes in a real lecture and can pay attention without them? Does that make it "active" learning? Lol, everyone is different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
2K Member
|
I'm pretty sure the purpose of his post was to say don't blankly watch the videos just for the sake of watching them.
__________________
ACCEPTED MD CLASS OF 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
1K Member
|
I just saw Chad's videos yesterday and it was AMAZING!!
This is coming from me thinking: Khanacademy=not detailed enough Freelance Teach: takes too long to cover a topic like 100 minutes of lecture for 1-2 formulas I tried wikipremed for 10-15 min in one video and I didn't know what he was talking about and it seemed a bit slow/boring. Chad's videos are awesome! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
Also, to contribute to the thread, Wikipremed is much better... it is clear that the guy who does those videos is focused on giving people an understanding of the material, look at the modern physics videos he created that is not even covered on the MCAT, it's obvious that Wikipremed is trying to convey an appreciation of knowledge. "Chad's videos" looks like it brushes over things, not to mention it is a marketed product... compared to a free product (wikipremed). As a general rule things that are free are better, take Linux as a prime example, it is the best operating system out there. Maybe Chad is emotionally appealing to people, who knows, if someone posts his vids on torrents I might watch them at 4x speed lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
2K Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
|
+1 for chads as lecture + tbr for additional content. He also includes worksheets with each vid. They don't take too long and are worth doing in my opinion. I feel like the chief evangelist for chads lol. It's just that I learn well from videos and lecture- much better than textbooks- so these have been ideal for me. They blow GS out of the water. Also I find wikipremed very convoluted and overall just confusing. It is a great resource, but if you find it convoluted chads is for you.
Sent from my LePanII using SDN Mobile |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
2K Member
|
Chad's videos are amazing. Not even a question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 298
|
Quote:
To add to Chads videos, he has notes added to each video, and quizzes to most, but the notes are useful to add on to. Its a nice template to add on too and it follows his lecture. Not to downplay WikiPremed, I've watched Trans. Motion form Chad and WikiPremed, and Chad does a great job at explaining basics and explains graphs very nicely and systems, while WikiPremed built a better conceptual understanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
|
I'm almost done with TBR studying and there are definitely weak points in my physics and g-chem, would this still be recommended?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
2K Member
|
Are chads the *********** videos?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
|
Now that I've watched all of his Gen Chem videos and Physics videos, I can shed some insight. DO NOT watch his physics videos. He skips way too much important information and they are just way too basic (it may be useful if you're taking the OATs or something). I feel like I wasted my time watching them since I only found his kinematics videos useful. His Gen Chem videos were really good, though. I'll be watching his OChem videos soon and I'll let you know how they go. I'm a huge fan of Khan Academy and don't like the fact that Chad charges. Will be account be canceled if I give my account information to others?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
2K Member
|
i'm not so sure if I want to pay for all of the videos...I think i'm gonna try wiki premed first and see how things go from there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
LOL dont think so, but isnt there like a 1 month expiration date on the account? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
|
[QUOTE=. As a general rule things that are free are better[/QUOTE]
I don't think this is true at all. The logic doesn't make any sense. Why would someone spend time making great MCAT study products if they receive no incentive besides a thank you on SDN.
__________________
"I am a little train, and that is all that matters." |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
|
John Wetzel of wiki premed doesn't charge and I think his videos are WAYYYYY better than chads.
__________________
Balll soo hard mercy, mercy me that murcielago. How you say broke in spanish me no hablooooo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
2K Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
|
I'm sorry, but I'll have to disagree. Like I said earlier, Sal from Khan Academy has no hidden agenda - he truly just wants to spread knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
2K Member
|
Quote:
I went from not understanding PY very well to feeling really comfortable with the subject after watching his videos. If you are struggling with PS USE CHAD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
2K Member
|
So I took the plunge and bought chads videos, I just finished the kinematics ones and I think they are much better than wikipremed videos for kinematics. I can't speak for the other sections yet but so far they're looking good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Senior Member
|
I did the same....haven't gone through Physics, but Gen Chem seems to be pretty well put together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
2K Member
|
Yeah I'm gonna Start the gen chem one tmrow. I just like the way he teaches compared to wiki premed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Me too. Although i do have to say that Wikipremed's Physics videos are still good, just different. I'll be going through Chad's physics and Gen chem videos over the next week or so to see if I can bring up my PS score. We'll see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
|
for those of you using Chad...I'm buying his MCAT prep vids in the next day or 2...are you using them in order, or skipping around through the various topics? I was watching wikipremed, and he seems great, but I wanted something a little more in depth, as with physics especially it's been a couple years and he seemed to just kinda skip right over some things. I used Chad's for my undergrad ochem and i really liked him, but haven't tried out any of his mcat stuff yet. does he show short cuts etc?? and are you using him in conjunction with anything else? I have the SN2ED study pack and was planning to use his schedule, with chad's videos...any input?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
2K Member
|
So I just finished watching the second set of his chem videos and I must say he is amazing at explaining chem!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yes, I agree. Gen Chem is one of my weak points. The way he explains things is super effective IMO. Just got done with the solubility lecture, and I feel very confident with these questions now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
2K Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
2K Member
|
Just wanted to share something else. For those of you that have seen both chad and wikipremed videos, do you Get the feeling that chad is definitely more knowledgable in Chem where as John from wikipremed is better at physics? They are both good regardless but just something I've noticed...
Last edited by typicalindian; 03-13-2012 at 09:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
|
Can someone link the wikipremed videos please
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
2K Member
|
Wikipremed.com
Edit:in regards to my question before...after a little "research" I see that chad is a teacher in the chemistry/biochem dept of his school. That explains it In that case, I'm definitely going to be using Chad's organic review as well...considering he teaches it haha
Last edited by typicalindian; 03-13-2012 at 09:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
|
I'm buying Chad's today. Hopefully I'll feel 'ready' by my test date... I was trying to follow wikipremed but some of the stuff I just didn't have a clue what he was even talking about. Maybe after I watch Chad's physics I'll go back and watch wiki since the general consensus seems to be that wiki is good for physics! I've found some pretty good videos for bio especially online too, besides Khan. And I've been using BR after I watch tutorials on most things, because I'm such a visual learner. I think I'll mainly be relying on online videos as I have a hard time concentrating on books!
If anyone wants a list of the sites I've been looking at let me know and I'll try to post some of them...! |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
Chad's videos are probably the most bang for your buck in terms of review material. Especially if you're a more visual learner(which I think most of us are). He also gives plenty of examples to work with. I used his videos, when they were free, for my orgo class and it did wonders. But if I may ask, what videos were you looking into for biology? It's my worst subject, I feel like I just get lost in my own train of thought when reading any material on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
5K+ Member
|
how do you pay for them??? Each vid is $4, or $15 for each section or $30 for the whole series. The $30 is obv a better deal if wanting to watch all...is that what y'all did?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
5K+ Member
|
Oh kk I see, and i think the individual prices are for 90 days. I added a gen chem series and few physics vids to my cart that amounted to $24. Not bad, but still a rip off..and the deal about the videos expiring is ridiculous...this guy is making so much money.. oh well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
5K+ Member
|
Quote:
More insight would be good till i do |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
5K+ Member
|
Quote:
2. Create Instructional videos 3. ???? 4. PROFIT!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Senior Member
|
DrV - those reproductive and immunology videos are perfect! Thanks mate
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:32 PM.





In that case, I'm definitely going to be using Chad's organic review as well...considering he teaches it haha





Linear Mode

