|
|||||||
| Pre-Medical Allopathic [ MD ] Premedical student discussion forum | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
__________________
Accepted University of Texas Medical Branch Class of 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
inside a lobster suit!
|
I did last year. It went well. Turns out my interviewer is my molecular bio seminar professor. It lasted about half hour and was somewhat formal. He also gave me feedback on my PS and what the committee thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
the dogtor is in
|
If you don't mind my asking, at what school was this allowed? Typically, the committee interviewers are not to be known to applicants previously to promote fairness and avoid a conflict of interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
inside a lobster suit!
|
I went to a very small LAC where everyone knows everyone else, especially in the science departments. It would be pretty hard to avoid that unless they brought in a Spanish or Art History professor to interview me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
the dogtor is in
|
You're very lucky to have had a friendly interviewer, some institutions recruit faculty from the humanities or even professors emeritus and alumni for committee interviews. Thank you for broadening my perspective on the general committee interview process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
inside a lobster suit!
|
Quote:
Had I read some of the horror stories on SDN, I may not have even gone to my committee for a letter since I missed the application deadline by a month! Not all schools that boast their acceptance rates are stat-loving nightmares. I was a below average applicant with a late application and they still fully supported me every step of the way. As with everything on SDN, take it with a grain of salt. Good luck with your applications! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
5K+ Member
|
I interviewed with my committee over a year ago, but they were LEAGUES tougher than any of my actual med school interviews (and I had eight of those). They made me totally afraid of real interviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
I would agree with this, but I also did my committee letter at CU so it could just be the way their pre-med committee does interviews. In general, it looks good for the committee to get a high percentage of their students accepted, so I think they would tend to be tougher interviews than actual med school interviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
What exactly is the advantage of having a committee evaluate you versus individual professors?
__________________
MD Class of 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
The main advantage I noticed was that the actual committee letter satisfies LOR requirements at most schools. This was helpful for schools with strange LOR requirements that I would not have met without the committee letter. From my understanding, most pre-med committees rank the people who get letters, so schools say this provides a more objective measure of LOR's. In addition, the committee can offer advise on whether or not to apply, how to improve and provides practice interviewing. Some schools also specifically ask on secondaries why you chose not to get a committee letter if your UG school offers one. Overall, the benefits are probably minimal, but it can come in handy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:12 PM.











Linear Mode

