Go Back   Student Doctor Network Forums > Pre-Medical Forums > MCAT Discussions > MCAT Study Question Q&A

Notices

MCAT Study Question Q&A Subforum specifically for asking questions when studying for the MCAT.
Please no actual MCAT questions.
RSS: Feed Icon


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2012, 09:20 AM   #1
New Member
 
Status Pre-Medical
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4

Default Ochem Passage Questions


SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
I'm having difficulties in understanding two questions of the following passage. Could someone here please help me with it?

The passage is from Princeton Review MCAT Science Workbook Ochem - passage 4 (advanced passage)

"A research chemist synthesized Compound A, which was shown to be a powerful analgesic upon clinical testing. Further evidence indicated only one stereoisomer of A was the acitve agent. The researcher was instructed to separate Compound A into its different stereoisomers to help determine which one was the analgesic.

Compound A, which showed an optical rotation of 0 degree, was treated with the R stereoisomer of Compound B (melting point 55C). Two easily separated solids, C and D, whose melting points were 101C and 90C, respectively, were isolated from the reaction mixture. Compound C and D were then independently treated with warm aqueous acid. After workup, Compound C gave Compounds E and B, which Compound D yielded F and B. Testing of Compounds E and F determined that E was the active analgesic, while F was biologically inactive."

Question:
1. Compound A can be described as:

a. a meso compound
b. a racemic mixture
c. an equal mixture of two diastereomers
d. an optically pure compound

Answer is B. The explanation given is "from the information given, Compound A is a mixture of two stereoisomers. With an optical rotation of 0 degree, it must be a mixture of enantiomers, which is racemic mixture".

My concern is, I could tell only from the text that it is a kinda mixture. However, if consider calling it "compound A", shouldn't it be a pure chemical?

2.
Compound C and D are best described as:

a. enantiomers
b. tautomers
c. diastereomers
d. rotamers

Answer is C. Explanation: "Compound C has configuration R, R while compound D has configuration S, R. They are different at only one center and are therefore diastereomers.

My concern is that I couldn't tell how to figure out the configuration of C and D just based on the passage. I could only guess they are probably diastereomers.

Thank you very much!
mscjulia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 03:42 PM   #2
SGU MS-2
 
Morsetlis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Posts: 4,882
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mscjulia View Post
I'm having difficulties in understanding two questions of the following passage. Could someone here please help me with it?

The passage is from Princeton Review MCAT Science Workbook Ochem - passage 4 (advanced passage)

"A research chemist synthesized Compound A, which was shown to be a powerful analgesic upon clinical testing. Further evidence indicated only one stereoisomer of A was the acitve agent. The researcher was instructed to separate Compound A into its different stereoisomers to help determine which one was the analgesic.

Compound A, which showed an optical rotation of 0 degree, was treated with the R stereoisomer of Compound B (melting point 55C). Two easily separated solids, C and D, whose melting points were 101C and 90C, respectively, were isolated from the reaction mixture. Compound C and D were then independently treated with warm aqueous acid. After workup, Compound C gave Compounds E and B, which Compound D yielded F and B. Testing of Compounds E and F determined that E was the active analgesic, while F was biologically inactive."

Question:
1. Compound A can be described as:

a. a meso compound
b. a racemic mixture
c. an equal mixture of two diastereomers
d. an optically pure compound

Answer is B. The explanation given is "from the information given, Compound A is a mixture of two stereoisomers. With an optical rotation of 0 degree, it must be a mixture of enantiomers, which is racemic mixture".

My concern is, I could tell only from the text that it is a kinda mixture. However, if consider calling it "compound A", shouldn't it be a pure chemical?

2.
Compound C and D are best described as:

a. enantiomers
b. tautomers
c. diastereomers
d. rotamers

Answer is C. Explanation: "Compound C has configuration R, R while compound D has configuration S, R. They are different at only one center and are therefore diastereomers.

My concern is that I couldn't tell how to figure out the configuration of C and D just based on the passage. I could only guess they are probably diastereomers.

Thank you very much!
Just because you all it "dopamine" doesn't mean it doesn't have both L- and R-DOPA.

The question is basically: You react A with R-B, then some further reactions, and yield E, B, and F. How did you start with only A but ended up getting both E and F, which are different? If A were a mesocompound (0 rotation amongst different stereoisomers with non-0 rotations), treatment with only 1 other reagent (R-B) would not have yielded 2 different reagents at the end. Therefore, A must be a racemic mixture. If A were diastereomers, the optical rotation wouldn't be 0. Optically pure means it's 1 stereoisomer, not a mixture of two different ones.

C was obtained by mixing one enantiomer of A with R-B. D was obtained by mixing the opposite enantiomer of A with R-B. Unless B had the same optical rotation as one of A, adding a non-180/360 rotation to your two enantiomers will yield diastereomers. Rotamers involve rotation around a single bond and are not stereoisomers.
__________________
You must learn from the mistakes of others. You can't possibly live long enough to make them all yourself.
Morsetlis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 06:33 AM   #3
New Member
 
Status Pre-Medical
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4

Default

Thank you so much! Really appreciate your help!
mscjulia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 04:47 PM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2

Default

I am concerning the first question: base on the solution, the answer is B, because by definition, an equal mixture of two diastereomers is racemic mixture. But isn't that is option C?! So why not c?

Sent from my Inspire 4G using SDN Mobile
Hellovv14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 07:04 PM   #5
New Member
 
Status Pre-Medical
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2

Default

A racemic mixture is a mixture of equal amounts of L and R enantiomers of a chiral molecule (non-superimposable mirror images), not a mixture of diastereomers, which differ at one or more chiral center and are not non-superimposable mirror images of each other.

I think the only way you can tell between choices A and B is by seeing that you get two different products later on (for the first question)
Nezeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2012, 12:37 AM   #6
8-16-13-39-42-45
 
gettheleadout's Avatar
 
Status: Pre-Medical
MDApps: View Profile
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,303
SDN Moderator SDN Gold Donor SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

As to why choice A is incorrect on the first question, Morsetlis' explanation is correct. If Compound A were meso, then it would not be possible to separate it into different enantiomers. In fact, it is impossible to have a racemic mixture of a meso compound because no enantiomers exist, so A and B are mutually exclusive. B is the only choice that satisfies any of the criteria other than optical rotation of 0.
__________________
Summer Research Data | Med School Info & Thread | Med School Data & Thread | SDN Mobile for iPhone/iPad or Android | Donate for perks!


MCAT Flashcard Count: 888
gettheleadout is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Comments are closed.