|
|||||||
| Pre-Dental Predental student discussion forum | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1662267.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
Its already possible to "keep 32" if you take care of your teeth. Society will always need dentist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
Haha you're right, it's called brushing your teeth twice a day with fluoridated toothpaste. If people can't get this right what makes you think that they'll use this mouth wash or what ever the product maybe to prevent caries! lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
.
__________________
UNLV School of Dental Medicine Class of 2017
Last edited by teethfordays; 08-06-2012 at 06:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
1K Member
|
as americans, we tend to look for quick solutions. idk, this product could prob sell really quickly at first
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
This seems interesting, but if people brushed their teeth, flossed regularly, and used mouthwash we would also be worried about having jobs.... but people don't. Also, if this product did work as good as they say it does, a big industry dental equipment manufacturing company would just buy the patent.... and then burn the drug. Dental equipment companies make way too much money to all of the sudden just say, "Well, that sucks, guess we file for bankruptcy and go back to college." They will fork over a couple hundred million and no one will ever hear about this drug again, except when they're sitting in a dental chair and their dentist tells them how they can really "Keep 32". Just my thoughts!
__________________
PAT 27 / AA 24 / TS 24 GPA 3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
1K Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
1K Member
|
But does it whiten? That's all the masses care about. Looking like a horse.
__________________
Lectures recorded? PowerPoints provided? Attendance mandatory? If you attended, are attending, or know for sure about a certain school, please share. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
1K Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 646
|
Hahaha the only people who post in this thread are pre-dents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Old Man Invierno
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 412
|
Quote:
Tooth decay is ultimately caused by acid erosion. And as bacteria, primarily Streptococcus mutans, grow on the enamel while absorbing sugars, they excrete acids. This in turn erodes the tooth surface and causes tooth decay. Therefore, as long as there is an abundance of acid rich foods around us such as sodas, having an anti-streptococcus mutans WILL NOT pose a danger to our profession. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 646
|
also lol that this comes from Huffington post.
The only reason they're publishing it is to make a scene. Colgate, crest, or some other major pharma company will buy it up and destroy it. Many things have been invented and have never seen the light of day - like the affordable electric car. Money speaks, wealth whispers. I don't think this will significantly affect dentistry. I do think that dentistry - like all professions that don't deal with robots directly will eventually be lost. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
1K Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
2K Member
|
People who are into science fiction and futurists' theory believe that one day robots will replace most human roles in society. I doubt this will ever occur but it's fun to think about. Robotics slugs behind most other technological fields because it's hard (read: limited practical potential) and generally ineffective compared to more economic alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Super Cool Member
|
LOL this is nonsense. There are plenty of other bacteria in the mouth than the one mentioned. People could just brush their teeth and floss as a remedy ...
__________________
Those scientists better check their hypotenuses, dude! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 646
|
Quote:
Look, innovations will incur, everything I've read and everyone I've spoken to says so. From adcom to retiring oral surgeons. Dentistry is not like how it was in the 70s and 80s(shocker of the year, someone call the Higgs-Boson guys, this is the discovery of the century.) We'll all have to change at some point. It's part of life. I can't understand why pre-dents and pre-meds try to look at their profession with rose colored goggles. I know some of you special little flowers will think I'm being 100% serious, so I'll annotate things for you. The following paragraph is a hyperbole: Yeah, maybe there will be some magic pill that automatically fixes everything - even orthodontic work. Maybe there will be a pill that induces bone regeneration - no more implants. Maybe we can invent a cavity eliminating once a week pill. Who knows? Maybe? hyperbole Maybe we'll all just genetically engineer humans to not even have flaws and look like Kim Kardashian. The fact is, we're forgetting what we are before "healthcare professionals" - we're scientist too, or at least we should be. Use your dental education and be creative. For being some of the most educated and intelligent people in society, healthcare professionals make quite a cluster fest when little changes happen. Has the blush gone off dentistry? Are we to be put on the shelf with pharmacy and optometry(which btw is an inaccurate and very uninformed statement)? Well, no, but let's assume it has. So you lost your practice right? Because everyone is able to afford a 1000 dollar a pop magic pill to protect all your teeth. Your practice will close because people trust a pill and pharma companies over a dentist. All the elderly people just love change anyways. Why visit a dentist? We have pills! Well, want to eat and have a home? Best to get a job I'd say. Go research dentin properties, salivary gland research, oral oncology, sublingual drug treatment research, oral biology, go study to become something else! Go utilize your hand skills in another form of surgery. Evolve with dentistry. Yeah, it won't be as hands on and there won't be as much patient contact. And worst of all we'll be poor! You will still be employed. An education really is priceless. I know most people don't understand what I'm getting at here. 300k+ debt yes, I know. You'll never pay it off unless you have your dentist salary, yup you bet. Healthcare professionals are all about money, most of them, yes. We'll simply have to evolve with the field. Even in the worse case scenario, I don't think we're in much trouble. Too bad I'm an optimist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Lost and confused
|
You know what kills s. mutans?
Fluoride. Killing bacteria isn't the issue; we've been doing that for decades--it's preventing them from coming back. As long as people eat, there'll be bacteria, and there'll be cavities. Besides, the fact that no one can find any hint of the original research nor can they find any trace of the two supposed project leaders is a little more than sketchy. I'll wait until I see something in a journal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
I don't understand how would the molecule work; don't selective antimicrobial drugs generate resistance? If so, a collective utilization of the drug would be impossible, right? Sorry for my English (: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Also, don't antibiotics have to be prescribed? I think dentists could totally use this new drug as a prescribed-only drug during days-long wait times in between procedures to slow dental decay. Otherwise, bacteria will really make resistance in relatively short time. Does anyone else know how fast is the evolution of typical bacteria against certain antibiotics? I know in Laboratory where I used to work at, we had the wrong bacteria often times on our petri dishes. Another thing to note is how selective is this drug. If it's gonna wipe out majority of bacteria in mouth, we could get yeast infection. Or anywhere in the intestine, it's a bad thing. And these are just to say that the drug itself doesn't cause cancer/etc. Human trials haven't commenced yet. Lastly, would this even benefit P & G or Colgate? I mean if this is too efficient that will bring dental procedures to all time low, then these guys will put their own business in jeopardy once most bacteria is eradicated. Who would buy their multiple mouthwashes/tooth pastes anymore if you don't get cavity? I'de just buy one tooth paste and that would be it. I'm sure ADA would not be overly enthusiastic to give accreditation to these products anymore either... Just my few thoughts. Keep the discussion going please. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 PM.










Linear Mode

