Go Back   Student Doctor Network Forums > Physician / Resident Forums [ MD / DO ] > Radiology

Radiology Radiology discussion forum.
Co-Hosted with radRounds.
RSS: Feed Icon


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2012, 03:06 PM   #151
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 367
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default


SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
Quote:
Originally Posted by shark2000 View Post
You are BSing left and right.
STFU and go and write these BS is the family medicine forum and not here. You will get a lot of support there.
We have some more important things to discuss here.
That was pretty unnecessary and I think reflects a lot about yourself. MtHood made some good points. Anyone who has spent a few years in our health care system knows we need more good family doctors in this country as our system is incredibly fragmented.

Good luck in your career in medicine with the attitude you have towards your colleagues who chose a "lesser" specialty.
naus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 03:44 PM   #152
That's Hot
 
Dumb's Avatar
 
Status: Resident
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: telerads from my parents basement
Posts: 558

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naus View Post
That was pretty unnecessary and I think reflects a lot about yourself. MtHood made some good points. Anyone who has spent a few years in our health care system knows we need more good family doctors in this country as our system is incredibly fragmented.
What good points did he make? His entire argument rests on a poor understanding of his own field. The rads forum is not the appropriate venue for this...remember radiologists are referral-based and these referrals often come from PCPs. It's his own colleagues in FM/IM/etc. who are the problem based on his argument. Although it would be pointless, he should raise these issues with them.
__________________
Squat 305
Bench 205
Dead 315
Total 825
Dumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 06:06 PM   #153
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 591

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naus View Post
That was pretty unnecessary and I think reflects a lot about yourself. MtHood made some good points. Anyone who has spent a few years in our health care system knows we need more good family doctors in this country as our system is incredibly fragmented.

Good luck in your career in medicine with the attitude you have towards your colleagues who chose a "lesser" specialty.
1-In true life I always support family doctors and talk about how hard they job is. But if someone calls my specialty unnecessary, overpaid, redundant, .... I do not have any respect for him/her.

2- There is a big delusion among family doctors that they are over-worked and under-paid. This will not change as almost half of doctors are PCPs in this country and WE ARE DOOMED to accept it. They have a strong voice.

3-I do not see any good points in what MtHood says. His argument is why we get paid more than PCPs. You can continue it forever. We cover a family doctor big clinic. I get paid 4 bucks to read a chest X-ray and a family doctor gets 50 bucks just to say hello to the patient, order the chest X-ray and then fill some paper work. To me he is really over-paid. You do not understand what does it mean to be RESPONSIBLE for an entire image.

4- After interacting with family doctors as a part of my work, I have found a lot of them really cool great personalities. But there are a large number of them with inferiority complex and delusions of being under-paid,. ...

5- Your have a very false perception of radiology. I have done outpatient medicine as intern, I have done 30 hour ICU shifts in a busy hospital, . .. Clearly non of them is as difficult as radiology call. We have sometimes senior residents from other fields like PM&R, Family medicine, Neurology, Orthopedics, ... who rotate with us. All of them get surprised by the pace of our work. And FYI, the pace of work in university setting is almost half of what is in true life.

6- Family doctors in my neiborhood do not open their office before 9 and usually leave about 5-6 pm. Whenever I call them, they are "AT LUNCH" from 12-2 or they are on vacation. Dude, family doctors are overpaid.
shark2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 06:47 PM   #154
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 367
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark2000 View Post
6- Family doctors in my neiborhood do not open their office before 9 and usually leave about 5-6 pm. Whenever I call them, they are "AT LUNCH" from 12-2 or they are on vacation. Dude, family doctors are overpaid.
The guy who make $150k working 50 hrs a week is overpaid compared to the guy who makes $350k working 50 hrs a week and entirely dependent on referrals?

I don't think radiologists are overpaid, I think all doctors are underpaid, but you're pretty full of yourself.
naus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 06:53 PM   #155
That's Hot
 
Dumb's Avatar
 
Status: Resident
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: telerads from my parents basement
Posts: 558

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naus View Post
The guy who make $150k working 50 hrs a week is overpaid compared to the guy who makes $350k working 50 hrs a week and entirely dependent on referrals?
Yes, when you factor in specialized knowledge, length of training, stress level, malpractice risk, etc. The people who don't get this should actually try to read about how the RVU system was developed instead of constantly BSing here. Basically a harvard economist was hired by the govt to find out how doctors should be reimbursed and used said factors to develop the current reimbursement system. It's really not that complicated.
Dumb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2012, 07:01 PM   #156
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 367
SDN 7+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumb View Post
Yes, when you factor in specialized knowledge, length of training, stress level, malpractice risk, etc. The people who don't get this should actually try to read about how the RVU system was developed instead of constantly BSing here. Basically a harvard economist was hired by the govt to find out how doctors should be reimbursed and used said factors to develop the current reimbursement system. It's really not that complicated.
Ah Harvard economist now. So then you're totally game that these economists are recommending 50% cuts on some imaging studies.
naus is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Comments are closed.