Go Back   Student Doctor Network Forums > Physician / Resident Forums [ MD / DO ] > Emergency Medicine

Notices

Emergency Medicine Emergency Medicine discussion forum Feed Icon

 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2004, 04:05 AM   #1
roja
4K Member
 
roja's Avatar
 
Status: Attending
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NYC--->San Francisco
Posts: 4,470
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default AFib: Beta blocker vs dilt


SDN Members don't see this ad.
So, I have had several patients with afib and tachycardia (one with a pacer one with out) and the overall preference for slowing rate seems to be Dilt.

Everyone seems to like beta blockers in theory but the general feeling seems to be: 'they just don't work as well'. What's everyone elses experiences?
__________________
The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them.

All things truly wicked start from innocence.
roja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 04:50 AM   #2
Kalel
Banned
 
Kalel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 793

Default

Don't know if you were just looking for anecdotal experience, but the American College of Cardiology has a website with a lot of different "practice guidelines" that I like.
http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelin...nt.htm#VIII_F1
A lot of the recent studies examining rate control have been using the non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in addition to digoxin, but there also seems to be some benefit to using beta blockers in the non-acute/chronic management stage since they may decrease morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients (whereas the calcium channel blockers may worsen morbidity and mortality if used chronically).
Kalel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 05:13 AM   #3
EMIMG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 127
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default Depends

Depends on the patient population. I am always concerned about the use of cocaine in my patient population therefore, I tend to go with the CCB.
EMIMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 06:34 AM   #4
DocWagner
Senior Member
 
DocWagner's Avatar
 
Status: Attending
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 525
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

I use cardizem with greater frequency, but I have used Lopressor also (usually if they are on the PO dose at home). When I have a patient refractory to Cardizem boluses, and they still have a rate of 120 or so I will bolus Lanoxin then redose q 6. There are great articles at www.empractice.net and at www.emrap.us (the writers of EMRAP/USC-LAC)
__________________
Emergency Medicine Attending

Member of SDN (before it was SDN circa 1998)...old man.
DocWagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2004, 11:47 AM   #5
beyond all hope
Senior Member
 
beyond all hope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 623
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default don't treat chronic afib

Sorry, I don't even really remember how to treat chronic a-fib anymore. I seem to remember I used amiodarone a lot. For rate control I always use a Dilt and Dig, just habit I guess, plus I work with a mostly African-American population with a lot of Asthma, DM and PVD.

If you look at the ACLS protocols and texts you see Verapamil as first line, but I never use Verapamil, even for SVT.
beyond all hope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2004, 08:10 AM   #6
dr.smurf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 148
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

but remember that CCB are neg inotropes so you have to be careful in pts with CHF as it may put them in failure. the cardiologist i worked with used BB as first line if not contraindicated (severe COPD, etc.). Dig loading is effective and cheap but can take up to an hour so if you have a pt with symptomatic RVR you should go with something that will slow the rate down fast like BB or CCB. but an EF< 40% you should stay away from CCB!
dr.smurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2004, 07:17 PM   #7
trauma_junky
12 step pre-med rehab
 
trauma_junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,122
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

We use cardizem and Amioderone (works like a charm).
__________________
Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want rain without thunder and lightning.
--Frederick Douglass (1817-1895)
trauma_junky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2004, 08:32 PM   #8
southerndoc
life is good
 
southerndoc's Avatar
 
Status: Attending
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Atlanta & DC
Posts: 9,899
SDN Moderator SDN Life Member SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

We have a policy at my hospital (where I'm a student, not where I'll be a resident at) whereby any patient who receives diltiazem IV must go to the unit (usually CCU, occasionally MICU) for the first 24-48 hours.

So that brought up a discussion with the cardiologist who I am currently precepting with. He said that a-fib patients with RVR who appear stable should receive ORAL diltiazem instead of IV. He said IV is too expensive and that studies show that oral works just as well, although it takes about an hour longer than IV.

Is anyone currently doing this? Is he just taking a cowboy stance, or is this actually true? The man really knows his stuff, but I wonder whether he was just dissing EM physicians or whether he actually thinks EM docs use IV diltiazem too often. I tend to believe that he's an EM physician supporter because he's pushing for them to do treadmill testing in the ED (instead of admitting for obs and having medicine do it the following morning).
__________________
there is more to life than increasing its speed
southerndoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2004, 11:18 PM   #9
trauma_junky
12 step pre-med rehab
 
trauma_junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,122
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

Well, if you're dealing with a symptomatic acute RVR, I think it would be wise to go IV. Or Versed and "Clear!"
trauma_junky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2004, 01:50 PM   #10
DocWagner
Senior Member
 
DocWagner's Avatar
 
Status: Attending
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 525
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

Put it to ya this way...if you come into the ED with symptomatic A fib with RVR 1. you get an IV 2. I plan on using it with IV Cardizem rather than PO...if the rate is initially controlled with IV and they are placed on a drip, they then get po meds.
You guys will get used to managment when you do your ICU months and it is only you! I have used literally everything at some point...from Magnesium, to Ibutilide (sp?) to electricity. I have also noted that the Digoxin IV taking an hour, really hasn't stood up (for me anyway), I find that it works much faster, perhaps because i am using it in conjunction with a CCB.
The point is you should know 3 ways of controlling A fib RVR for just about any situation.
DocWagner is offline   Reply With Quote
Report advertising, harassment, and other inappropriate posts by pressing the button located to the left of the post.

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.


SDN Bookstore
Search  Advanced Search


© 1999-2009 Coastal Research Group. Some rights reserved.
The SDN Logo and "Student Doctor Network" are registered trademarks of CRG. ☠ Arggh.

TRUSTe Trust Mark   Creative Commons License   We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the HON Foundation.  Click to verify.   HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.