|
|||||||
| Topics in Healthcare A place to discuss, discourse, hold forth, and maybe, just maybe, have your mind changed. |
| View Poll Results: What is the worst disease of all time? | |||
| Ebola |
|
60 | 16.85% |
| AIDS |
|
103 | 28.93% |
| Spanish Flu |
|
25 | 7.02% |
| Black Death |
|
79 | 22.19% |
| Malaria |
|
18 | 5.06% |
| Leprosy |
|
11 | 3.09% |
| Small Pox |
|
32 | 8.99% |
| Other (specify) |
|
28 | 7.87% |
| Voters: 356. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
|
SDN Members don't see this ad.
I would have to vote for the spanish flu simply because
-it killed 50-100 million people world wide -mostly killed people in their prime and not the elderly or children -made people turn so blue/black that they were unrecognizable -in my home town of philly, we ran out of coffins so we simply piled bodies in the street |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Bubonic Plague wiped out 1/3rd of Europe. i think it was 250 million people killed at the time! (someone correct me here)
The disease continues to haunt innocent souls... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Unretired
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,023
|
The one that had the biggest impact or the one that would be the worst to find out you have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
it says alltime...^
so im guessin impact |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
1K Member
|
Quote:
As far as modern diseases go, I think ALS is up there...not in terms of impact, but in terms of scaryness/mystery/seriousness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Well blah blah fishcakes
|
Speaking of the plague, did anyone watch House this past week?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
1K Member
|
Quote:
Let me guess, they save the day by discovering the patient was eating something or had done something that would have been discovered in any routine patient history? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
|
Wow
wiki said small pox killed 200-500 million people on the 20th century! I would have voted for black death, but influenza was able to kill 50-100 million people in just 1 year! It even wiped out 85% of some indigenous populations and depressed the average american life span by about 5-10 years (if i remember correctly). |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Well blah blah fishcakes
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
fortunately it's not as deadly as it used to be...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
2K Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Behold the mighty echidna
Status:
Medical Student
MDApps: Profile 3430
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 3,094
|
Quote:
__________________
"And now faith, hope and love abide, these three; and the greatest of these is love." 1 Corinthians 13.13 In case you wanted to know ...and the saga continues...and happily concludes!!! GW Class of 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
You Jump, I Jump, Jack
|
malaria, b/c you can get it again & again & again & again & again & then this one kind you can get it, get better, & then boom one day 30 yrs later, get malaria again
plus we had to read this paper for a class & it says malaria (& AIDS) are major reasons for poverty & underdevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
http://ktla.trb.com/news/ktla-shawnp...ll=ktla-news-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
1K Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
|
Too bad they don't give us small pox vax to us like they gave our parents. All it takes is 1 infection and our generation will be wiped out. Malaria is also really bad, i remember someone giving a presentation in bio lab and they said it still kills 3 million people every year.
the bird flu is scary. it never goes away. the lastest outbreak, if i remember, was in the 50's or 60's and it killed about 50,000- 100,000 in the US. It is about time we had another outbreak. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Unretired
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,023
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
|
I interpreted the polls' question a little closer to home. Ebola. At least I have a shot at living with the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
march 12th
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 555
|
Quote:
haha yea i noticed that too. "the number of ways self-injury can occur is limited only by the creativity of the patient and the available of opportunities." from the Lesch-Nyhan website |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
|
There is actually quite a good book on the Black Death called in the Wake of the Plague by Norman Canter, I believe (could be wrong on the author). The death stats are staggering, especially if you take them into consideration of the population at the time. Some areas had upwards of 95% mortality.
Not something I would want to have around... |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Duffman in Disguise
|
Quote:
Seriously, read up on it and you will be scared to death of this thing. My vote goes for Ebola....damn African monkeys and their diseases!
__________________
"Fame was like a drug. But what was even more like a drug were the drugs." - Homer J. Simpson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
be nice to the crackheads
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,536
|
2 billion people are currently carriers of TB.
There's a reason you have to get that test where they shoot a bolus of love under your skin any time you want to volunteer at a hospital. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuberculosis |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
|
The absolute worst disease EVER, ANYWHERE, would have to be love. Consider the facts:
1) Jillions of broken hearts -- the most common cause of bad poetry, crappy songs, Goths and bad letters of recommendation; 2) No vaccine. Even coming down with it provides no immunity against future exposure (unless you're a bitter old man/woman with 25 cats in a one bedroom apartment); 3) No treatment can mitigate symptoms. "Time heals all wounds"?! WTF? 4) Number one leading cause of PDAs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Banned for Trolling
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,767
|
The hemorrhagic fevers, especially Ebola or Marburg are the worst diseases to get.
With the other stuff like plague or influenza, we ahve drugs that work pretty well. With the hemorrhagic fevers, if you get sick you are dead and there isnt a damn thing you can do about it Fortunately the hemorrhagic fevers are spread only by close personal contact and are not airborne. Most of the people in africa got it because they would wash the dead bodies with their bare hands. Another rare disease thats truly awful is the Naeglera Fowleri or Acanthamoeba. You get these bugs by swimming in fresh water lakes, say Lake Michigan. The bugs penetrate your cribriform plate into your brain and you are dead within a few days. Not a damn thing anybody can do about it either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Clinically relevant.
|
If someone were to engineer the perfect disease - HIV would be it's precursor. It's stealthy, often taking years before diagnosis, allowing multiple transmissions. It makes the infected vulnerable to EVERY other pathogen. Oh yeah, we can't figure out how to stop it either.
The only thing it doesn't have: Airborn transmission.
__________________
WFUSM MSIV Interview Trail... |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 418
|
I believe the worst is HIV/AIDS. There are over 25 million dead and 40+ million living with it. About 5 million people are contracting the disease per year, and from what I've read, most scientist are guesstimating a cure 50-75+ yrs from now. And to think, all this happens in the face of modern medicine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
5K+ Member
|
The worst disease of all time in terms of mortality rate (deaths per 100,000 in the population per year) has to be the Black Death. Wiping out a third of the population of a continent is no small feat. AIDS may accomplish the same thing in Africa in the twenty-first century but it is treatable and its tranmission is understood and controlable.
Leprosy and TB are but treatable today but were psychologically horrifying in their day because its victims were put out of their communities and made to live apart in leprosariums and TB sanitariums that were virtual prisons. The hemorraghic fevers often kill their victims before the disease can be spread to others so each outbreak tends to burn itself out. Malaria causes significant morbidity and mortality but it is not stigmitizing nor feared as much as many of the others. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 719
|
I guess when I made the poll i wanted people to think about the disease in
1.) the historical context in which it was prominent 2.) how long did it take to kill off X number of people 3.) how easily is it spread 4.) how many people did/does it infect 5.) social impact/psychological impact of the disease I see leprosy gets no love, but maybe it really is the worst disease becauase it doesn't kill you as quickly. I remember attending a seminar given by an infectious disease specialist and he had slides of people who had leprosy that he had encountered. I remember seeing one guy with basically half his face rotted off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
In Memory of Riley Jane
|
I'm going to have to go with the Spainsh Flu from a World Health Standpoint. The fact is, it could pop back at any time and thin the heard again and there wouldn't really be anything we could do about it, it's just so damn transmissible. We got very lucky back in 1918.
AIDS is a close second, as lab monster pointed out, if it mutates to Airborne transmission, we're boned. But at this point, while it's not in check, it's not a potential species killer. Ebola is nasty. But it just hasn't done enough damage. Partially because it kills too fast.
__________________
What would[ ] Research and forensic detective work. -Boring [ ] Brood. -Boring [x] Shake down criminals in a warehouse with a skylight or other large window to jump through. [x] Deus Ex Machina |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Safety not guaranteed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 531
|
Why aren't more people giving smallpox its props? It knocked out nearly all the native americans and you could make a strong argument that it single-handedly kept our population in check for hundreds of years (notice that with it gone, the world is adding 1 billion people every 10 years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Perpetual Student
Status:
Medical Student
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Somewhere in the middle of nowhere.
Posts: 2,310
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Mothballed
|
Let us not forget the worms. Worldwide, the infection stats are as follows:
Total - >3.5 billion Roundworm - 1.47 billion Hookworm - 1.3 billion Whipworm - 1.05 billion And if you doubt power of the worms, please look here. Note: While the linked image is medical, and thus technically work/school safe, it could easily be... misinterpreted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Safety not guaranteed
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 531
|
Havarti, you just ruined my breakfast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
3K Member
|
I guess it depends on your definition of worst.
I would think HIV/AIDS for sheer loss of life and potential loss of life in the future, plus the tie-ins with with economic issues, leaving a generation of orphans, and relationship to increased occurrence of other diseases (e.g. multi-drug-resistant TB). Despite the vast amt. of research going into HIV treatments, at the heart of the problem is that HIV (like many infectious diseases) disproportionately affects the world's poor, and good science is not sufficient to tx it; there has to be a combination of education, prevention, and cooperation b/t nations, drug companies, scientists, and NGOs to get affordable, practical treatments to the places that are most affected. Sure, people who can get optimal tx might live for decades, but the multiple drug cocktail, take with food, must refrigerate kinds of drugs are not gonna solve the problem in Sub-Saharan Africa. For this reason, and because HIV is complicated by other issues of poverty, corruption, and war/unrest, I believe that HIV/AIDS will continue to be THE major public health problem on a global scale. Which is the worst to have? My vote goes for Ebola. Up to a 90% mortality rate, and you die bleeding from every orifice, with your organs liquifying, spewing up black vomit, along with other nasty side-effects like sloughing of your gut. But as LizzyM pointed out, it is really "too good" at its job, and is not an efficient pathogen because it kills too quickly to spread to epidemic proportions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: connecticut
Posts: 251
|
__________________
Well I've always had a deep respect and I mean that most sincerely. The band is just fantastic that is really what I think - Oh by the way, which one is Pink. Waters, Gilmour, Mason, & Wright UConn SDM |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
5K+ Member
|
I think it is important to consider diseases that continue to thrive despite major advances in modern medicine. Diseases like the Spanis Flu and Bubonic Plague (which becomes contagious only after it turns into the pneumonic plague) are easily controlled, and thus relatively non existent.
But diseases like Ebola and especially HIV/AIDS are crazy and almost ensure death.
__________________
Go RICE Go PENN ![]() ![]() ![]() UCSD C/O 2013!!!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() For now...GET BIG OR DIE TRYING!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
I am the creMASTER
|
Quote:
It's going to be so much worse this time because of the "global community" and whatnot.
__________________
UCSF c/o 2010 http://www.golimbs.com . . . check out "The Sultan." Oh yeah. (if you must) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 86
|
It has to be Aids. Out of the all the diseases listed Aids is the only one where those infected with the virus can't be readily detected and isolated from society. Infected people can live for years and pass on the virus to others before they even know they have it. Aids is much quieter and grows more slowly than the other diseases but nevertheless it's histories most potent epidemic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
In Memory of Riley Jane
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
calls shenanigans
|
TB.
It's killed untold billions through the course of history (inc. over 2 million annually today) and 2 billion are carriers. Perhaps the worst part is that here in Boston, a full course of meds to treat LTBI (the precursor to disease) is a whopping $27. It's not as sexy as HIV or Ebola, but over the course of history it's impact has eclipsed anything mankind has ever encountered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
User
|
Quote:
__________________
2nd yr Seeking self-actualization [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Squirrel Girl
|
If you want to read more about these diseases and how public health is vital in containing them, encouraging the search for vaccines (and rarely, cures) and so much more, I recommend this book, Betrayal of Trust: the Collapse of Global Public Health by Laurie Garrett. It is a big eye opener and has led me to seriously consider working in Public Healthi n the future.
__________________
No Whammies!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 418
|
In the grand scheme of things, HIV/AIDS isn't a problem for the heterosexual population in the USA. If you look at the transmission rates from male to female or female to male, it is very difficult to pass on and would probably wipe itself out if not for the gay community(male to male).---not trying to blame any specific community though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Member
|
ebola hands down..it's not even a contest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
3K Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
5K+ Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Believe, hon.
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
button located to the left of the post.![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|