- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
- Messages
- 254
- Reaction score
- 29
"How do surgeons face the risk of acquiring bloodborne pathogens (especially HIV, HCV) from their patients? What restrictions, official and unofficial, do HCV-positive surgeons face in practice (e.g: higher insurance premiums)?"
Let me start by stating that I do not know any surgeons who are HIV or HCV positive so I can't answer as to the specifics restrictions one may face. But I can relate a personal anecdote.
I was doing bilateral V-Y groin advancement flaps after excision of perineal hidradenitis. (If you don't know what hidradenitis is, believe me, it should be on your short list of things you don't want to have). He was HIV and Hep B/C positive. I stuck myself really good during closure. I know that the risk of transmission is extremely low after a solid bore needle (versus hollow bore) stick, (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=28167) but I have been tested every six weeks since and I think about it almost every day. So far I'm negative and I expect to stay that way, but I did talk to a few colleagues about the consequences of testing positive.
One point of view was that I would be bound ethically to tell anyone I operated on that I was positive and to provide data about the risk of transmission. They could then make up their own minds. There was also an argument for not saying anything since it would be damn near impossible to transmit disease to a patient unless you were like the dentist many years ago who did it on purpose. The justification for the latter point of view, besides the astronomically low risk, was that we operate on people all the time without knowing their serological status and therefore are always at risk. I don't entirely agree with this, but it I'll put it out there anyway. There are some good articles here:
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/164/12/1715
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/413582
As far as what I do, I wear two pairs of gloves and I've been doing so since I was an intern (even when I operate on kids). There are microholes in the latex gloves, but the chances of having two microholes line up together over a possible break in the skin while your operating in a bloody field on a positive patient have got to be pretty small. While there's no data to support two-glove use and decreased rate of transmission, it makes me feel better. I've seen some only wear two gloves when they know that they're operating a positive patient. Unless you're used to it, you'll find that you'll be a little clumsy. I am also a lot more careful about my needles.
--M