1) Your individual scores and composite score
10/9/11 (PS/VR/BS)
Total score: 30Q
This forum has been a great help to me. I just barely make the cutoff to be able to post in this thread, but I hope that I have some useful advice to pass on to you.
2) The study method used for each section
PS: Read threw the EK books for physics and general chemistry. I had just finished gen chem a few months ago and am strong in that area so I just brushed up a little. After realizing a deficiency in physics, especially physics I material, I got the EK 1001 physics book and went through a lot of problems. I probably did about a 1/3 of the problems in a week. My scores on practice tests went up considerably after that. Was honestly kind of bummed by my PS score, because I felt very confident about it walking out of the test.
VR: Read through the EK strategy a few times over, and took maybe 5 of the EK 101 tests. Got an 11 on the last one I took, then got a little lazy and stopped taking them.
BS: I didn't study at all for this section, besides taking practice tests and reviewing them. I'm a bio-related major and felt confident about my knowledge. I was taking organic I & II this summer, while studying for the MCAT, so I did not review any organic material either. Unfortunately, I was not prepared well for difficult organic passages, and got nailed by two. I really only knew the essential concepts, did not know any specific reactions.
3) What materials you used for each section(Kaplan, TPR, Examkrackers, AAMC, etc)
EK all the way. I bought the Kaplan Guide to 45 book and thumbed through their advice. I did some of the passages in that as well. I'd say it was a complete waste but I ended up following their WS advice completely. I didn't really practice the WS much but got a decent score because of that.
4) Which practice tests did you use?
Kaplan 1 - 9 PS / 9 VR / 7 BS = 25
Kaplan 2 - 9 PS / 10 VR / 7 BS = 26
Kaplan 3 - 8 PS / 9 VR / 8 BS = 25
AAMC 4 - 9 PS / 10 VR / 9 BS = 28
Kaplan 4 - 10 PS / 10 VR / 10 BS = 30
AAMC 5 - 10 PS / 11 VR / 11 BS = 32
TPR Diagnostic - 9 PS / 6 VR / 9 BS = 24
AAMC 7 - 7 PS / 9 VR / 10 BS = 26
TPR 6 - 8 PS / 9 VR / 9 BS = 26
AAMC 8 - 10 PS / 9 VR / 10 BS = 29
AAMC 6 - 11 PS / 11 VR / 10 BS = 32
AAMC 9 - 12 PS / 9 VR / 11 BS = 32
AAMC 3 - 10 PS / 9 VR / 9 BS = 28
AAMC 10 - 13 PS / 9 VR / 10 BS = 32
AAMC AVG - 10.25 PS / 9.62 VR / 10.0 BS = 29.88
I like to say I got a 32 on my last three practices, because when I took #3 I was kinda careless (I took it at night after a long day at work). So, I was hoping for a 32 on the actual test. However, being that my overall AAMC average was a 30, I am
extremely content with my score.
I was unhappy with the Kaplan tests and would not personally recommend them. I thought the TPR tests were better, although the verbal on them was unfairly deceptive. The AAMC tests were great and were quite similar to the actual test. If I were to do this again I would have also tried the TBR tests that everyone seems to like.
5) What was your undergraduate major?
Biomolecular sciences, chem minor
6) Any other tips you may have for those of us who still have this test lurking over us?
If you have gotten A's in all of your basic science courses (come on, they're not that hard) you should not have to spend very long reviewing the material. You certainly do not need to consider a prep course, they will feed you at least 75% garbage material that is beyond the scope of what you need to know. Prep courses only have a use for those who haven't taken the courses in 5+ years AND probably didn't do well in them; if you got an A in the course, you can brush up on the material by yourself. You will need to become a self-learner at some point. So if you aren't already, why not now.
Besides taking practice tests, I never considered reviewing for the BS material, because I knew plenty and what I needed brushing up on would be obvious after taking the tests. I believe most of your time should be spent taking and reviewing practice tests. If you are diligent about checking your answers and reviewing your shaky areas, you have the opportunity to
destroy this test. I would recommend the EK set to just about anyone. Supplementing shaky areas with the 1001 or 101 series books they provide is also a good idea.
Looking back, I should have reviewed my practice test answers more than once (unfortunately, was taking two summer courses and working while studying). I should have also taken all of the EK 101 VR tests, I know I could have done better than a 9. Also, after taking the test I kick myself for not studying the organic sections, and would probably recommend spending more time on that. More time than none, at least.
7) How long did you study for the MCAT?
About 2 1/2 months. I studied pretty much every day for 1-2 hours. Adding in practice test days, I'd estimate roughly 150 hours. If I didn't have to work and take summer organic I would have studied more, but I did what I could manage. I tried my best to realize when I started feeling burnt out, so about halfway through I took a 3-day vacation from studying.
There's a point where you start to get diminishing returns from studying. I'm a firm believer that no one should study for more than 3-4 months for this test. I have friends who studied for almost a year, several hours a day, and scored sub-20 (and they are bright people).
Study enough to make yourself
confident. Don't let anyone tell you that you
must study for 3+ months. Also, don't buy into the 8-12 hours studying per day advice... Seems like such a huge waste of life to me. Other than that, be smart, be aware of burnout, and do things your way. Good luck