- Joined
- Jun 16, 2006
- Messages
- 869
- Reaction score
- 1
This question is for those of you who took the MCAT this cycle...so real test = kaplan or aamc??
Bio- definitely Kaplan.. the passages are very similar in difficulty
consensus from other areas on this board is that kaplan verbal is complete crap and not representative, EK 101 verbal passages is much better
how is kaplan verbal crap?
Exhibit A:
When referring to questions that ask about specific things mentioned in the passage...kaplan says you should never infer anything. if its not said in the passage explicitly, then it can't be correct. dont use outside knowledge, stick with the passage.
According to the passage, the Romani have migrated to which of the following countries:
I. France
II. Armenia
III. China
I put "II only" b/c the passage says " From there they followed the west...through Armenia...." Pretty straigh forward.
According to Kaplan, the answer is "I and II only" because the phrase "throughout Europe" implies that they migrated through France".... ummmm no it doesnt. do you know how huge Europe is.
Can't speak for the MCAT because I did absolutely no prep for it, but in med school I used Kaplan for Step I and USMLEWorld for Step II. USMLEWorld is by far a better question bank and a better tool for test prep.
The one I took was def. Kaplan and had a curve more similar to Kaplans than AAMC.
I dont konw what to think.
I've never received above an 8 for AAMC physics....i take two kaplan tests and receive a 10 and an 11.
I've never received below an 8 on AAMC verbal...I take two kaplan practice tests and get a 7 and an 8.
I've never received above a 10 for AAMC bio... I take two practice kaplan tests and get an 11 and a 12....
is my studying paying off or is it the more lenient curve? i dont want to get my hopes up too much, although it is a nice boost of confidence. i take my test May 27th
kaplan is more like the read deal by a LONGSHOT. If you go into the real test hoping for something like AAMC 3-10 (especially the earlier ones) you are in for quite a suprise.
what about the score? how do those compare? thats really all I care about. if i thought the test was way harder than AAMC but got a higher score, i wouldnt really care. If i thought the test was way easier but got 5 points below my average, i'd be pissed.
I took Kaplan FL's 1-8. I got dissatisfied with them due to the fact that 1) they are way too convoluted and not as straightforward as the real MCAT and AAMC practice tests, and 2) their VR sections suck.
Certainly I will not say that AAMC3 is what you will see on the real thing; something more like AAMC's 9 and 10 are more reflective of what you will see.
Perhaps Kaplan prepares you better for the "panic" of seeing something difficult, which you will most certainly see on the real test just because of test anxiety. I will give you that much.
haha, I took Kaplan 1-11 and I must say I was a fan. I definetly agree with your statement about Kaplan preparing you for the "panic". When I saw crazy looking passages and diagrams, it didn't phase me one bit. I had been there and done that.
so do u plan on making a long *ss post like Vihisidas netime soon on how u destryoed the sciences? im sure every1 would appreciate...or at least what ur scores were on all 260,000,30234,340234 practice tests u took
am typing it up as we "speak" boss.
wow your mcat score is amazing. what does it take to get 15s on the sciences?? I'm about 10-12 on physics and bio 8-11 (8 on aamc 11 on kaplans)...how do I make that jump???
patience mayne...hes typing it up as we "speak"