Surgical Knots

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

medschoolsoon

1
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2006
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
Anyone know a good book/internet site to learn most knots? Youtube only seemed to have a two handed tie. My awesome mentor ;) gave me a few suggestions but a lot of the books don't do a great job if you've never learned them or don't have someone to show you.

Thanks and much love!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Call Ethicon or google "free ethicon knot tying board." It's not even close to what you're really going to do, but you can learn some principles. It's free for medical students.
 
You get a royal college of surgeons video which is pretty good for knot tying and other basic surgical skills.There is also a Mayo clinic basic surgical skill video and text.
 
Essential Sugical Skills by Sherris and Kern. I got this about a month ago since I'll be starting residency in July and I did 90% of my surgical rotations before last June and haven't been in the OR at all since early December. Step by step diagrams of surgical techniques, knot-tying with a DVD.

Unfortunately, I can't tell you if it's any good since I haven't been doing a very good job of getting ready for residency...... I still have one week though, I have high hopes :rolleyes:
 
I always found the easiest way to learn is to have an MS-IV or resident teach you. Nothing beats someone walking you through tying, IMHO.
 
I always found the easiest way to learn is to have an MS-IV or resident teach you. Nothing beats someone walking you through tying, IMHO.

Absolutely. I always took time at the beginning of the students' rotation to show them 2-hand tying and basic suturing skills. Of course, at least at our institution, they almost never utilize anything except the instrument tie. I never really found a good opportunity to have the students knot-tying in the OR.....their role seems to be limited to closing skin.
 
The OP should take advantage of any of the above-mentioned learning techniques for knot-tying and focus on learning to tie good, square knots. I see a lot of people tie granny knots (poor form!).

I spent significant time as a student learning to tie one- and two-handed knots with both hands, but now I generally use instrument ties because it's faster, and I can sew with really, really small pieces of suture.
 
The OP should take advantage of any of the above-mentioned learning techniques for knot-tying and focus on learning to tie good, square knots. I see a lot of people tie granny knots (poor form!).

A knot is a knot imho. Square knots are what I throw because that's what was pounded into me. Certainly square knots are useful for closing abdominal fascia, or other high tension closures, but square knots are not essential in every scenario.

If you think about it, why in the world is a square knot essential for closing skin? Most of the attendings in my program don't even use suture for skin... they use staples. And why should a square knot be essential for closing skin which should be under zero tension anyway? A "granny" knot will work just as well for skin or other zero tension closures. I've even started selectively using dermabond in the ED to close some small, clean, lacs...

Dre, I'm not trying to pick a knot fight here, but the "square knot mafia" mentality never made sense to me. Now, being ambidextrous does make sense, and I encourage all trainees to get equally comfortable with tieing with either hand.
 
I learned how from my Cub Scout Handbook back in 3rd grade. I think it is still less than $10 ;).

Celiac Plexus said:
A knot is a knot imho. Square knots are what I throw because that's what was pounded into me. Certainly square knots are useful for closing abdominal fascia, or other high tension closures, but square knots are not essential in every scenario.

If you think about it, why in the world is a square knot essential for closing skin? Most of the attendings in my program don't even use suture for skin... they use staples. And why should a square knot be essential for closing skin which should be under zero tension anyway? A "granny" knot will work just as well for skin or other zero tension closures. I've even started selectively using dermabond in the ED to close some small, clean, lacs...

Dre, I'm not trying to pick a knot fight here, but the "square knot mafia" mentality never made sense to me. Now, being ambidextrous does make sense, and I encourage all trainees to get equally comfortable with tieing with either hand.

Studies have actually shown that loop (slip) knots have greater tensile strength under tension than do square knots. Furthermore, it has been shown that anchoring a running stitch by starting with half-hitches and ending with a square knot is safer and more secure.

As for skin closure, many of our plastic and breast surgeons don't tie in the suture at all; they place a subq stitch without tieing either end (to approximate the skin), dermabond over the top and then pull out the suture (or cut it at the edge of the skin and leave it) when the dermabond is dry.
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
As for skin closure, many of our plastic and breast surgeons don't tie in the suture at all; they place a subq stitch without tieing either end (to approximate the skin), dermabond over the top and then pull out the suture (or cut it at the edge of the skin and leave it) when the dermabond is dry.

Some of our attendings like that as well, when closing laparoscopic incisions. That way you can use one piece of 4-0 Monocryl to close all 3-4 incisions, without the need to stop and use scissors to cut anything. Just connect all the incisions, Dermabond, then snip!
 
Some of our attendings like that as well, when closing laparoscopic incisions. That way you can use one piece of 4-0 Monocryl to close all 3-4 incisions, without the need to stop and use scissors to cut anything. Just connect all the incisions, Dermabond, then snip!

That's how I do it...have to be all about efficiency now.
 
A knot is a knot imho. Square knots are what I throw because that's what was pounded into me. Certainly square knots are useful for closing abdominal fascia, or other high tension closures, but square knots are not essential in every scenario.

If you think about it, why in the world is a square knot essential for closing skin? Most of the attendings in my program don't even use suture for skin... they use staples. And why should a square knot be essential for closing skin which should be under zero tension anyway? A "granny" knot will work just as well for skin or other zero tension closures. I've even started selectively using dermabond in the ED to close some small, clean, lacs...

Dre, I'm not trying to pick a knot fight here, but the "square knot mafia" mentality never made sense to me. Now, being ambidextrous does make sense, and I encourage all trainees to get equally comfortable with tieing with either hand.

I suppose I'm guilty of that as well. I make a point of throwing square knots because that's what's been drilled into me since I started sewing. As far as skin closure goes, it depends on what situation you're describing. For a small skin closure, by the time you get to the skin, it should be zero-tension. In most cases I favor a running subcuticular stitch over stapling, because the subcuticular stitch allows for closer approximation of wound edges, leading to a smaller scar. The real strength of closure derives from approximation of the superficial fascial system as described by Lockwood et al. However, when you're doing something like an a-plasty on a big person, the case can be long enough to allow for significant primary contraction and no matter how good your subcutaneous/SFS closure is, the dermis on the apposed wound edges always wants to pull away from itself, which can lead to exposed dermis without good subcuticular closure. That is, the size of the incision combined with the size of the patient dictates that there will be some tension on the skin closure.

No knot fight necessary, even though I've been forced to join the Square Knot Mafia. Ambidexterity is also good.

Studies have actually shown that loop (slip) knots have greater tensile strength under tension than do square knots. Furthermore, it has been shown that anchoring a running stitch by starting with half-hitches and ending with a square knot is safer and more secure.

I read that study. I hadn't seen it before, and it's pretty interesting. However, there are a few problems with it: first, the study is based on only 5 knots with 5 throws each tied, all tied by the same person; second, the knots were tied in a "dry" fashion (i.e. not in a real operative situation); and third, the sutures all had their loops divided and forcibly distracted at 180 degrees (again, not realistic) at half a centimeter per minute with a preload of 1 kN (~100 kgf!). If I saw one of my sutures being stretched 50 mm in one minute, I would become mildly distressed. Finally, the study also concludes that larger suture has a lower tensile strength, which seems slightly counterintuitive.

Basically, the study conditions are not realistic, and the authors themselves acknowledge that they do not assess for knot slippage--only tensile failure of the material--and I've always been taught that a slipknot does just that, it slips. My guess is that the authors obtained the results that they did because their testing apparatus exposed the suture to artificially increased angles, which enhances the point of weakness (i.e. suture kinking) created by any knot, and extremely high tensile forces. A better way to test this question would be to reduce the angles to something closer to a real-life scenario, to have many different knot-tyers tying a much larger number of knots, to assess for knot slippage as a measure of knot failure, and to test more than three kinds of suture.

As for skin closure, many of our plastic and breast surgeons don't tie in the suture at all; they place a subq stitch without tieing either end (to approximate the skin), dermabond over the top and then pull out the suture (or cut it at the edge of the skin and leave it) when the dermabond is dry.

Every surgeon likes to do something different. Some people like to run a subcuticular Monocryl/Prolene/whatever with the ends left free and reinforce it with Dermabond or Steri-Strips, others like to anchor the subcuticular closure with a knot. Depends on who's operating. I personally favor Prolene with the ends left free and Steri-Strips.
 
Last edited:
I had a related question that someone out there might know... I've gotten down the 1 handed knot (the best thing I got out of my 3 week Neurosurgery rotation to start my 3rd year) but in the process never practiced or saw a 2 handed knot (the NS residents flat out said they don't even remember how to tie one) so my question is, having knowledge of a 1 handed square knot, is learning the 2 handed knot necessary or is there no indications that have a 2 handed knot is better than a 1 handed (I know the NS people said a 1 handed was required for some of there things because it allowed you to maintain tension with the stationary hand). Any input?
 
I had a related question that someone out there might know... I've gotten down the 1 handed knot (the best thing I got out of my 3 week Neurosurgery rotation to start my 3rd year) but in the process never practiced or saw a 2 handed knot (the NS residents flat out said they don't even remember how to tie one) so my question is, having knowledge of a 1 handed square knot, is learning the 2 handed knot necessary or is there no indications that have a 2 handed knot is better than a 1 handed (I know the NS people said a 1 handed was required for some of there things because it allowed you to maintain tension with the stationary hand). Any input?

I would say it was very program dependent.

I learned the one handed as a medical student and started using it exclusively until I got to intern year. I trained in a program where junior residents were not allowed to tie a one handed knot; so several of the interns and myself sat around trying to remember the two handed. Then I got so good with the two handed that it was hard to switch back. The one handed is very useful in small places (like the brain) or deep cavities (like in the abdomen).

Therefore, not knowing what situation you may find yourself in knowing both is a good idea. I know of no good reason to prefer one to the other except as I've outlined (room and program preference).
 
Every surgeon likes to do something different. Some people like to run a subcuticular Monocryl/Prolene/whatever with the ends left free and reinforce it with Dermabond or Steri-Strips, others like to anchor the subcuticular closure with a knot. Depends on who's operating. I personally favor Prolene with the ends left free and Steri-Strips.


I like using the prolene/steristrip combo, but I have to admit there are only a handful of people outside of plastics that use it here in Wichita. There are some incisions, such as peri-areolar, where I feel like the running subcuticular looks like crap. For those, I like to do interrupted dermal stitches and steri-strips, although I end up placing the dermal stitches superficial enough that they're almost interrupted subcuticulars......

Honestly, as an intern I spent a lot of time on my closures, but now I usually let the med students do them, and you have to allow them a certain amount of lattitude since they're just learning.....



so my question is, having knowledge of a 1 handed square knot, is learning the 2 handed knot necessary or is there no indications that have a 2 handed knot is better than a 1 handed (I know the NS people said a 1 handed was required for some of there things because it allowed you to maintain tension with the stationary hand). Any input?

I feel like the 2-handed tying comes into play from time to time, and it needs to be in your arsenal. When I'm throwing a surgeon's knot, I'll use two hands because I find it easier than the 1-handed technique.
 
Med students should ALWAYS learn the two-handed tie before the one-handed one. Helps you learn the basics of a square knot.
 
Med students should ALWAYS learn the two-handed tie before the one-handed one. Helps you learn the basics of a square knot.

Ditto.


Knot tying and suturing is best learned by doing. I generally take interns/med students and have them start 'suturing' a sheet for me. I give tips on how to hold needle drivers, etc (assuming that all my ms4's have learned first the two handed and then the one handed).

Then I like to throw them for a loop and have the try their hands at vertical and horizontal mattresses.

Learning by doing is really the only good way to learn to tie. Then practice.
 
yuck....started practicing today. T-minus 8 days and let me tell you there's some work to do to get back to my baseline.....

Plug into the ipod and sew sew sew.
 
My uncle, a GS, taught me how to do one handed knots. And for a week while he did consults in his office I tied knots into pillows :)....By the end of the week I thought I was pretty good, then we went back into the OR and saw him closing, he won......
 
Top