- Joined
- Aug 23, 2007
- Messages
- 2,950
- Reaction score
- 320
Careful with your quotation marks there, bub. Acing a test has nothing to do with being a good pharmacist. Understanding and applying a concept is very different from regurgitating minutia. If you know that 12% of strokes are hemorrhagic, and a hemorrhagic volume >60mL is associated with 71-93% mortality at 30 days, good for you. I don't think that will make you a better pharmacist for knowing that.
Another logic fallacy. Why students that know that stuff must not know how to apply it? How is not knowing factual information is suppose to make someone a better pharmacist than someone who does?
Studying something more usually leads to a better understanding of that concept, not worse.
Edit:
Unless a test is very poorly written, it does not just test memorization of facts. Don't know about tests at other schools, but the questions on tests at my school are written to include everything from basic facts to patient cases that required full grasp of concepts. There is no way a person could get a 4.0, probably not even a 3.0, just by regurgitating facts on them.
Last edited: