Go Back   Student Doctor Network Forums > Physician / Resident Forums [ MD / DO ] > Sleep Medicine

Sleep Medicine Sleep Medicine discussion forum. RSS: Feed Icon


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2012, 12:54 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Status Attending
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5

Default Nasopharyngoscopy


SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
Could we as sleep physicians do a CME course and then perform/bill for this procedure?

I could see it beeing useful in some adult and most pediatric sleep patients.

Anyone heard/thought about it?
SleepMD1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2012, 01:56 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Status: Attending
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 284
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

I would agree that a fiberoptic exam is somewhat useful in an adult but disagree that it makes much difference in a kid. Pretty much any kid with OSA or UARS is going to get a T+A automatically- doesn't matter what the scope looks like. Maybe would be helpful in a kid with recurrent OSA after T+A.

In an adult, it can be somewhat more helpful at trying to identify if there is a specific area that is narrowed (i.e. oropharyngeal obstruction from big tongue base/lingual tonsils), but mostly you just see that everywhere is narrowed.

Personally, I'd prefer if you keep referring patients to us haha. I've seen radiation oncologists and ED physicians who do fiberoptic exams so you could probably do them if you wanted to. Not sure about reimbursement though...
OtoHNS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2012, 09:51 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Status Resident
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 14
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

I don't see much of a point in doing this procedure as a sleep doc unless you have the capability to do something about it. Even if you do a fiberoptic scope and see lingual tonsils or some other obstruction, most of us aren't going to go in and do the surgery, we would still likely have to refer to ENT who would probably do their own exam in the office anyways. Seems to defeat the purpose to me...
OklahomaFP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 05:40 AM   #4
Craniorectologist
 
Faebinder's Avatar
 
Status: Fellow
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,556
SDN 5+ Year Member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OklahomaFP View Post
I don't see much of a point in doing this procedure as a sleep doc unless you have the capability to do something about it. Even if you do a fiberoptic scope and see lingual tonsils or some other obstruction, most of us aren't going to go in and do the surgery, we would still likely have to refer to ENT who would probably do their own exam in the office anyways. Seems to defeat the purpose to me...
Exactly, you're gonna refer him to an ENT anyway to do the surgery. They are better off doing it themselves to be more comfortable with the anatomy.
__________________
Dr. Cox: "Lady, people aren’t chocolates. D’you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don’t find them half as annoying as I find naive bobble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine."

KotOR II, Kreia: "It's such a quiet thing to fall, but it's a far more terrible thing to admit it."
Faebinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 12:12 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Status Attending
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5

Default

Thanks for the input!

I've had a few pediatric patients that were several years s/p T&A and had some residual OSA. I have been sending them to ENT to evaluate for lingual tonsils/adenoidal regrowth and perhaps surgical intervention. As OklahomaFP and Faebinder noted, if they do need surgery, then me doing a fiberoptic exam would not be necessary. But what about if that exam was negative, then I could jump to CPAP or some other treatment?
SleepMD1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2012, 08:25 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Status Resident
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 14
SDN 2+ Year Member
Default

If a patient has residual OSA, then CPAP or any other alternative treatment is ALWAYS an option, you just have to educate the patient on how effective those treatments would be. CPAP is effective, but compliance is the issue. Other alternatives may be possible choice depending on severity of the residual OSA.

Again I think if you were concerned, I'd still send to an ENT i trusted to do the exam. If its negative, they could then refer back to you for medical management of the OSA.
OklahomaFP is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Comments are closed.