|
|||||||
| Psychology [Psy.D. / Ph.D.] For discussion of PsyD or PhD issues. | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 27
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
I have quite a lot to compare and everytime I open SPSS I need to re-select all the different variables. Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
You're running the analysis multiple times, I assume? If you only need to run it once, saving the output is your best bet. (When it gives you the output, which will be in a different window from your data file, click file and save. You should be able to save the .spo file to open later with SPSS).
If you really are running the same or similar analyses over and over (e.g., with slightly different data sets, etc), then the best way to save this analysis is to use syntax. Instead of clicking OK before you run your t-tests, click 'Paste'. This will open a new window with the code that runs the t-test. Save that syntax, and you can open and run it any time in the future. I hope this helps! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Neuropsychology Fellow
|
Yep, saving the syntax would've been my suggestion as well. You can then just manually type in/change the variables as/if needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 27
|
Thanks for this, it helped greatly. Yes, I was running the same analysis for different data sets. I was having trouble deciding on which outliers to exclude.
What is the general consensus on outliers (is it excluding anything 3 STD outside dataset)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Neuropsychology Fellow
|
Personally, I usually start with z=3.29 as my cut-off, although up to z=4 might be appropriate for a larger N.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 129
|
I would check the Cook's D and Leverage values to see how influential the outliers are. If they aren't influential I would leave them in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
3K Member
|
One of the problems with outliers is there is no general consensus. I've typically done +- 3 SDs, but it varies based on a number of factors. Transformations can pull them in a bit, but are generally only done if you also have skew. There are even arguments that unless you have reason to believe they are illegitimate values (i.e. mistakes filling out the form, etc.) that you shouldn't exclude them.
The lack of standardization has been one of the most infuriating things for me in research, especially since I have happened to be involved in multiple studies where the outcomes depended entirely on relatively arbitrary decisions like these. Personally, I'm a fan of "run it several ways, pick one, report one and footnote the others" approach. Reviewers have been mixed in their feelings on it, but I can't ethically justify to myself doing anything else unless it doesn't change the outcomes. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 PM.










Linear Mode

