|
|||||||
| MCAT Discussions Talk about the current MCAT, future tests, and study tactics. | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
For people who have used both resources to supplement your MCAT studying, can you please tell me the pros and cons of both? And which one is better to spend my money on? Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
Chad's because it has a better track record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
1K Member
|
Chad is very good, great teacher, has a lot of teaching swag lol. The problem = it can be a bit undetailed sometimes
JCO (I've only used him for Bio) but all the small things I had trouble in in Bio he actually had a small video explaining. His problem is the videos are super slow, thank God there not long (average=4-5 min) Id get both lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
Anyone else have any insight? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
zzzz
|
jcos notes for organic chem are golden because they really teach you mechanisms and stuff you can expect to see. I didnt use his orgo notes before i took the exam, had no clue on an entire orgo pasage, looked at his notes and saw that he had detailed notes on an orgo topic that would have made the passage so much easier...i wont give out more information then that.
for bio id say they're good mainly for molecular. And the overview on anatomy isnt half bad. for gc and phys they're eh, tbr is just really what you need here i think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:58 PM.










Linear Mode

