|
|||||||
| Psychology [Psy.D. / Ph.D.] For discussion of PsyD or PhD issues. | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
I know Endnote is the "standard" but is also expensive, and looks hideously involved with a huge learning curve. So what do you use? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Neuropsychology Fellow
|
I personally use Endnote, but only because I'm able to get a copy free through my university. Once that's no longer the case, I'm not quite sure what I'll switch to, but I'll definitely come back to this thread for some suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
3K Member
|
I wouldn't say Endnote is "hideously" involved, but its not straightforward. Like AA, I get it for "nearly" free ($10) through my university. I've heard good things about Mendeley, but haven't used it.
The major downside to Endnote is that it is SUPER buggy, and often leaves me wanting to throw my computer/their programming staff out a window. Unless they've patched it recently, it does not import DOI numbers correctly which means you have to fix the vast majority of them. It allows you to search online and automatically download articles. This would be nice if it friggin worked, but the only database it seems to link with properly is PubMed, it seems to only have about 1/10 chance of downloading the PDF properly. Even the search for some reason seems limited...I'm not sure if its PubMed that sucks (I usually use PsycInfo) or Endnote itself, but I've had it fail to find tons of articles I know are there, even when explicitly searching for them. I keep meaning to try some new software, but much like my eternal good intentions of switching from SPSS to R for stats, I never find the time to actually sit down and learn it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
I say Endnote is "hideously" involved because it has about a gazzillion styles, downloads and add ons.....
PERRLA works well for me for formatting...but you have to manually enter citations into the local database....there is no collaborative database. Eazypaper appears to have a collaborative database shared by all it's users, plus a library database.....but there don't seem to be a lot or reviews of it out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
You should look at Mendeley. http://www.mendeley.com/
I just downloaded it and I'm going to play with it later, but it seems promising. Its free so what do you have to lose? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Neuropsychology Fellow
|
Quote:
As for EndNote's bugginess, yeah, I've given up using its article search function. I just download the citations and manually import them into my citation collections at this point. The DOIs look to have all remained intact that way. I think this'll sometimes lead to the authors' initials not being formatted correctly, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
2K Member
|
Software? Whatever happened to just typing it up?
I'm oldschool. I cut and paste references I use often and type in new ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 392
|
yeah my previous supervisor - everything was typed, we had no software.
this time around though we have a campus license for EndNote, I have to say I've gotten used to it's quirks and it is really helpful. there are a ton of settings you can play around with to make it spit out exactly what you are looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
That's such a waste of time and can be prone to errors depending on which citation style you have to use. Additionally, the beautiful thing about citation software is that you can change the entire reference style of a document in a few clicks. Super handy for submitting to a different journal, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
And a big thanks to those who recommended Mendeley......awesome stuff....I tried it out and immediately started using it. I am doing a paper about gifted adolescents and it imports everything, article, cites, bib, etc. directly from Sage. I think it will work great with PERRLA! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
PhD Student
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm so glad I'm not the only one! I had no idea this existed. Makes my writing, thus far, that much more of an accomplishment, I'd say!
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Neuropsychology Fellow
|
I definitely wrote my thesis and first couple articles in grad school (as well as pretty much every paper for my classes) without any kind of reference management software. I then started using it for my comp exam paper, and was hooked. As has been mentioned, perhaps the single greatest advantage it offers is the ability to switch between various citation styles, which can be particularly helpful if you switch from a journal that uses APA to one that prefers numbered citations, for example.
It requires a decent amount of work on the front end inputting/importing references, but if you write in the same topic area(s) pretty consistently, then once your database is built, it's ridiculously easy to maintain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
|
I used End Note throughout grad school, including with my dissertation that I am defending shortly. End Note was a life saver. The only "glitch" I had was with an improper multi-author citation - it involved a fix that took about 30 seconds total by formatting "off-line"
after I had completed the paper. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
|
I use Mendeley to sort my journal articles but imo it's not been great for the actual references, citations, etc. For me, it's just easier to do that myself. Also, I'm a FOSS advocate and so paying for software makes me pretty sick. Just my deal, though. At least Mendeley is usable on all platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
|
I've been using Mendeley for about a year now, and so far I quite like it for database storage. I like that it can be used across multiple computers (home, work) and that citations can be shared with others. It also saves a copy of the PDFs and allows a lot of note-taking, which is awesome. Plus you can basically just add files to your library and it imports all the salient information (note: you will want to verify, as it sometimes makes mistakes).
As someone else said, though, I'm not sure how great it is for actual reference section formatting. I've been old school (copy/pasting/typing in myself) and only recently delved into letting some software do its thing. Provided the reference is imported correctly to begin with, it seems to work fine. Plus....free! |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
1K Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,555
|
We had this on one paper as well: several of our references kept getting automatically changed because Endnote had them wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
2K Member
|
Quote:
However, they are only good if you use them appropriately. I can't tell you how many undergraduate students I have had that used software incorrectly and the references come out as a mess. Obviously that shouldn't be a problem for a savvy researcher, but automating everything can sometimes create other problems as well. I have friends that swear by it. But I am old school (by my standards). At least these aren't the days when "cut and paste" literally mean "cut" and "paste" from the typewriter. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:43 PM.





I'm so glad I'm not the only one! I had no idea this existed. Makes my writing, thus far, that much more of an accomplishment, I'd say!





Linear Mode

