|
|||||||
| Optometry Forum for practitioners and students currently enrolled in optometry school. | RSS: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
SDN Mentor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
Maybe your state is different, but there are no laws about that sort of thing where I am (medicine or optometry).
__________________
I will eat and digest you all with my system of mighty organs! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SDN Mentor
|
I think the intent of the question wasn't a question of the practice or scope of optometry but whether the process would comply with insurance contracts for documentation to support a claim submission. Does the doctor who saw the patient have to be the same doctor who submits the claim? Can a doctor delegate the authority to submit a claim if the examining and signing doctor is not credentialed with that medical plan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
1K Member
|
CMS does not allow for any grace period on a non-credentialed doc, as far as I know. You can have a non-credentialed doctor perform whatever he or she wants, but the signing doctor must be credentialed and must perform the required number of exam elements, and certain history components must be done by the signing doctor.
That's not to say that credentialed docs don't sign off for non-credentialed docs, but with EMR now recording who is signed in during exam periods, an auditor will know (or at least could claim) that someone other than the signing doc did the required elements. CMS, other medical insurers, and even vision insurers are starting to get much more aggressive with their auditing tactics.
__________________
"The truth hurts because Chuck Norris roundhouse kicked it." Last edited by Jason K; 09-23-2012 at 02:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24
|
My boss manages multiple offices and keeps putting me in an office no one wants to work at but that's where she happens to be and says that I have to be there for the time bring bc I am not credentialed with insurances yet so she needs to sign my charts. I just wanted to check if that was an excuse to put me there or if what she was doing was right. I'm fairly new so didn't want her to think she could take advantage of me.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 AM.










Linear Mode

