I will agree with xrt1102 somewhat so that people don't completely discount what that poster is saying. I rotated at two programs that seemed pretty malignant. There were policies, attendings, and administration that came down hard on their resdents. At least 60 hours a week was the norm, and 80 hours a week was common many months. At one program residents couldn't even take their vacation weeks or go to ASTRO until their last year because they were always expected in clinic. At that program and at another program residents were working Saturdays some months. I asked a PGY-3 where I should go out on a Friday night in that new-for-me city and the response was "I wouldn't know, I've never had a Friday night free."
Residents at those programs were often very unhappy, and I could see one of them posting something like this. At one such program, multiple rad onc residents were asking their prelim med programs if they could go back to IM.
The funny thing is that some big name academic programs preach to their residents that they should not go into private practice because "the private practice world is going to die. Reimbursements are going to be cut. You will wish you were still in academics!" In other words, "I know you're miserable now, but you should really stay here because it's going to be terrible out there." Every year it's another disaster that's due to happen right now. It's essentially a marketing tool to try to convince their residents to stay in academics, and for some residents I think the mentality that the field is sinking soaks into their brains.
I'm not going to tell anyone where these places were. But I will say both of these programs are frequently listed on your "top 10" best programs. Unfortunately, at the one program, the PGY-3s and PGY-4s seemed "hoodwinked". The volume at the program and number of attendings had rapidly expanded, outpacing the number of residents and support staff, stretching them extremely thin. The residents had to pick up all the extra patients and scut involved with it (making appointments, getting outside records, putting together charts, etc...). Thus, I tried to avoid any program with "100% attending coverage". This means the residents have to see every patient before the attending, and are typically responsible for every single note written. At one program, they were planning rapid growth and the chief told me that he was trying to fight against 100% attending coverage, but that it was probably coming soon. I ranked that program quite low. As usual, make your rank lists wisely.