I'm using MTB, but just thought to flip through FA step 2 CK, and cross check somethings and noted that's some facts are conflicting, FA looks rather old and not updated can it be trusted?
Accuracy of FA step 2 vs. MTB
- Thread starter surgicel
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2012
- Messages
- 3,882
- Reaction score
- 1,675
Completely irrespective of FA 2cK, MTB2 can't be trusted. The information in MTB2 actually got me one of the internal medicine shelf exam questions wrong straight-up.
I am finding myself in the same situation when it comes to MTB. I have no idea whether I should continue using it since theres not much else out there.
My friends have mentioned that Yale Gs is good but I would hate to invest my time again into a new book without knowing its accuracy.
My friends have mentioned that Yale Gs is good but I would hate to invest my time again into a new book without knowing its accuracy.
- Joined
- May 9, 2014
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 75
Because I have a short attention span and wouldn't be able to finish SUTM before the shelf exam, I've been using MTB2 as my only resource during my IM rotation. Could you expand a little more on why you think their info can't be trusted? Would hate to invest time in a resource that simply isn't accurate.
Of course, I'll also be doing the entirety of UWorld IM questions prior to the shelf exam (or that's the plan anyway).
