it's like the bloods and the crips with you guys on this forum.
When I go to an ISIS meeting, and I have gone now 3 out of the past 5 years, I expect to learn. the presentations are on point, and excellent. You need a certain level of knowledge to even follow the arguments that they present. that said, it is the SPINE intervention society. the focus is on spine related pathology. Their board of directors is impressive, the speakers have been known to be dogmatic. I have trained under, or done research with many people strongly involved with SIS.
I know there's a lot of bad blood between the organizations. but take a closer look at the ASIPP board, and the brochure of speakers. pain management is a small field. the same 30 people fly all over the country doing
all the talks. The next president of ASIPP was previously a board member of SIS, and is considered one of the best SIS course instructors ever. Dr Calodney still does SIS courses a few times a year. ASIPP has an impressive array of physicians on their board.
http://www.asipp.org/contact.html there are multiple current/previous academic department chairs, fellowship directors on that list. You will see more academic pain doctors at the annual meeting than the people on this forum want to acknowledge.
The current President of ASIPP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Staats
I like ASIPP meetings. I do believe they are more open to new therapies in pain medicine (yes, including all the fancy new stimulation technology). they also get into the politics of medicine, practice management, responsible opioid prescribing. etc
APS - I will never go again. many PhDs, RN PhD, PT PhD. etc.
I like going to AAPM, because it takes the people out of their societies (ASRA, ASA, SIS, ASIPP, NANS) away from their bickering. But they have the same 4 tracks every year and hearing the same talks gets old as well.
this year I'll be at AAPM, ASRA, ASIPP, NYSIPP, CASIPP, CCF meeting, Napa Pain, and probably SIS, AAPMR, NANS. like someone said earlier, they all have their own flavor. If you leave your prejudices at the door, you can try to appreciate the meetings as they are presented.