Another step forward in the race to the bottom...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

schrute

RoyalCrownChinpokoMaster
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
413
Reaction score
16
I know plans for this have been in the works for a while with trial programs having been initiated a few years ago, but I'm reminded of how this is not going to bode well for path...

(from the AMA newsletter)

CMS testing program to encourage Medicare payment bundling.

The Hill (8/24, Baker) reports in its "Healthwatch" blog, "Hospitals are interested in the new payment structure that Medicare announced Tuesday, but say they still need to look more closely at the program's financial incentives." HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius "said the existing system 'can punish the providers who are most successful' at keeping their patients healthy, and described the new bundled payment program as a way to realign doctors' incentives." Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and patient safety at the American Hospital Association, "was still reviewing the details of what Medicare proposed, but she said it's encouraging that the agency is allowing applicants to design their programs to meet local needs rather than establishing a single, nationwide model."

Kaiser Health News (8/24, Galewitz) compares the initiative to the discount airfare website Priceline, as it will allow healthcare providers to "Name Your Own Price." In order to participate in the program, "providers will have to bid less, in total, than what Medicare would pay each provider separately." [wonderful analogy...] According to Kaiser Health News, "the pilot program announced Tuesday in some ways is an even more modest approach than tried before, because doctors and hospitals can still choose to get paid individually on a fee for each service, albeit at a negotiated discount." HHS Secretary Sebelius called the bundled payments initiative "a key part of our efforts to give patients better health, better care, and lower costs."

The NPR (8/24, Rovner) "Shots" blog reports that "the new bundling proposal would turn that payment system on its head," and "would give all the providers involved an incentive to work more cooperatively." The "flexibility" of the program is being praised by healthcare providers. Blair Childs of the Premier Healthcare Alliance said, "This new alternative to the Medicare shared savings program will provide an on-ramp to those systems beginning the journey to full continuum accountable care, while reinforcing the alternative payment arrangements they may already have underway with private payors."

Members don't see this ad.
 
I know plans for this have been in the works for a while with trial programs having been initiated a few years ago, but I'm reminded of how this is not going to bode well for path...

(from the AMA newsletter)

CMS testing program to encourage Medicare payment bundling.

The Hill (8/24, Baker) reports in its "Healthwatch" blog, "Hospitals are interested in the new payment structure that Medicare announced Tuesday, but say they still need to look more closely at the program's financial incentives." HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius "said the existing system 'can punish the providers who are most successful' at keeping their patients healthy, and described the new bundled payment program as a way to realign doctors' incentives." Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and patient safety at the American Hospital Association, "was still reviewing the details of what Medicare proposed, but she said it's encouraging that the agency is allowing applicants to design their programs to meet local needs rather than establishing a single, nationwide model."

Kaiser Health News (8/24, Galewitz) compares the initiative to the discount airfare website Priceline, as it will allow healthcare providers to "Name Your Own Price." In order to participate in the program, "providers will have to bid less, in total, than what Medicare would pay each provider separately." [wonderful analogy...] According to Kaiser Health News, "the pilot program announced Tuesday in some ways is an even more modest approach than tried before, because doctors and hospitals can still choose to get paid individually on a fee for each service, albeit at a negotiated discount." HHS Secretary Sebelius called the bundled payments initiative "a key part of our efforts to give patients better health, better care, and lower costs."

The NPR (8/24, Rovner) "Shots" blog reports that "the new bundling proposal would turn that payment system on its head," and "would give all the providers involved an incentive to work more cooperatively." The "flexibility" of the program is being praised by healthcare providers. Blair Childs of the Premier Healthcare Alliance said, "This new alternative to the Medicare shared savings program will provide an on-ramp to those systems beginning the journey to full continuum accountable care, while reinforcing the alternative payment arrangements they may already have underway with private payors."

What will the effect of this be on pathology?
 
I know plans for this have been in the works for a while with trial programs having been initiated a few years ago, but I'm reminded of how this is not going to bode well for path...

(from the AMA newsletter)

CMS testing program to encourage Medicare payment bundling.

The Hill (8/24, Baker) reports in its "Healthwatch" blog, "Hospitals are interested in the new payment structure that Medicare announced Tuesday, but say they still need to look more closely at the program's financial incentives." HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius "said the existing system 'can punish the providers who are most successful' at keeping their patients healthy, and described the new bundled payment program as a way to realign doctors' incentives." Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and patient safety at the American Hospital Association, "was still reviewing the details of what Medicare proposed, but she said it's encouraging that the agency is allowing applicants to design their programs to meet local needs rather than establishing a single, nationwide model."

Kaiser Health News (8/24, Galewitz) compares the initiative to the discount airfare website Priceline, as it will allow healthcare providers to "Name Your Own Price." In order to participate in the program, "providers will have to bid less, in total, than what Medicare would pay each provider separately." [wonderful analogy...] According to Kaiser Health News, "the pilot program announced Tuesday in some ways is an even more modest approach than tried before, because doctors and hospitals can still choose to get paid individually on a fee for each service, albeit at a negotiated discount." HHS Secretary Sebelius called the bundled payments initiative "a key part of our efforts to give patients better health, better care, and lower costs."

The NPR (8/24, Rovner) "Shots" blog reports that "the new bundling proposal would turn that payment system on its head," and "would give all the providers involved an incentive to work more cooperatively." The "flexibility" of the program is being praised by healthcare providers. Blair Childs of the Premier Healthcare Alliance said, "This new alternative to the Medicare shared savings program will provide an on-ramp to those systems beginning the journey to full continuum accountable care, while reinforcing the alternative payment arrangements they may already have underway with private payors."

We have been reduced to nothing more than a commodity.

When will we see administration bidding on their own jobs? Answer: Never.

(Why did we ever hire administrators anyway?????)

They have now sabotaged the law so that we cannot run our own hospitals without them!!!!!!! (another great part of Obamacare)
 
Members don't see this ad :)
What will the effect of this be on pathology?

Nothing good, but that goes for all specialties, particularly hospital-based ones. Seems like the only safe haven is a field in which you can charge cash for your services. That is, until the government requires that you accept government-insured patients in order to maintain your licensure...
 
What will the effect of this be on pathology?
In terms of bargaining power with hospital admin, path is at the bottom.

Giving the hospital admin control of the medicare pie means there's a greater chance your slice is going to be weighed relative to the specialties that make $$$ for the hospital (ortho, surg, cardiology, etc).
 
...That is, until the government requires that you accept government-insured patients in order to maintain your licensure...


Somewhere, in the recesses of some bureaucrat's warped & wrangled mind, this seed has been planted if not already sprouted.
 
We have been reduced to nothing more than a commodity.

When will we see administration bidding on their own jobs? Answer: Never.

(Why did we ever hire administrators anyway?????)

They have now sabotaged the law so that we cannot run our own hospitals without them!!!!!!! (another great part of Obamacare)

A good CEO is invaluable to a hospital. That's why a CEO's median salary is 1,000,000 even at not-for-profit hospitals.
 
Nothing good, but that goes for all specialties, particularly hospital-based ones. Seems like the only safe haven is a field in which you can charge cash for your services. That is, until the government requires that you accept government-insured patients in order to maintain your licensure...

That isn't safe either unless you get paid upfront. Even then, not that safe because competition can be fierce unless you get a great reputation. The collection rate on cash patients is very low.

The number of hospital administrators is simply astounding these days. It's like every month we get emailed about a new "Senior VP" or "Chief" something "officer". These people never seem to be replacing another position, but are an additional new position. And all of these people get paid because the good ones help the hospital a lot in terms of the bottom line. But "senior" administrators are starting to outnumber physicians. Of course, if they don't produce results they do get canned pretty quickly.
 
A good CEO is invaluable to a hospital. That's why a CEO's median salary is 1,000,000 even at not-for-profit hospitals.

I can't argue with that. A group of doctors should be able to hire our own CEO to run our hospital. We cannot do that. CEO's can only hire us to work at THEIR hospital. This is an extremely partial (towards admin) regulation that puts enormous leverage in the hands of administration.
 
Check out this "Exhibit B" from iopathology that a GI buddy sent. We rib each other a lot- he calls me super-tech :)- and he is using this as ammunition.
I really can't stand these admin/pseudotech guys messing with us with so much impunity. Please everyone boycott these guys for the pride of our specialty.
Check out the language in their Notes section at the bottom of the page

http://www.iopathology.com/images/agreements_7_3470329995.pdf

If pathologists refuse to work for them (IOP) groups will not use them anymore. Even it means negotiating with the groups directly for a smaller piece of our pie. Just cut them (IOP) out completely.
 
Last edited:
Top