1) Scribes tend to have a high turnover, so you're always working with new ones. It takes a long time to teach them how you want your documentation and then they leave
2) There's nothing quite like documentation that's written in the way that you would say it
3) I incorporate a lot of decision aids in my documentation--PECARN, PERC, NEXUS, canadian head rules, etc
4) My macros are for the things I see commonly--migraines, back pain, cellulitis, otitis, etc. Macros can be dangerous, but like a few others on the forum have said before, they involve the same questions that I ask everytime and I know the text of them inside and out since I've been using them for years.
For example, for headaches, I ask a series of questions exploring things like SAH, venous sinus thrombosis, carotid/vertebral dissection, meningitis, neoplasm, trauma, carbon monoxide, temporal arteritis, etc.
On top of that, my macros are all bullet-point, so I can quickly go to a section and change it. People get into trouble when the paste in a paragraph of text and miss things. By having them in lists, I can easily see where things need to get taken out or clarified.