D
deleted126335
Anybody have any info or experience about this program? I am thinking of filing a complaint. I have been to the ASA website. There is a liar for hire that I would like to have disciplined for unbelievable testimony.
Anybody have any info or experience about this program? I am thinking of filing a complaint. I have been to the ASA website. There is a liar for hire that I would like to have disciplined for unbelievable testimony.
Is it Dr. White by any chance. That testimony was on the TV and was pretty disgusting to watch.
Nope. Just a local malpractice case with unbelievable testimony from a very recognizable, and prominent academic. Anyone have any other info anout any disciplinary actions taken? There is lttle info on the ASA website.
Nope. Just a local malpractice case with unbelievable testimony from a very recognizable, and prominent academic. Anyone have any other info anout any disciplinary actions taken? There is lttle info on the ASA website.
Probably was paid off by the attorneys. This is disgusting. There should be a way to file complaints on "expert witnesses" who clearly don't give a crap about ethics and more about their wallets.
There is. This program. Description on the ASA members website. Haven't heard much about it. Hence this thread.
http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Of.../Expert-Witness-Testimony-Review-Program.aspx
The key is to get the attorney to ask the question of the expert witness, "have you been certified by your national organization as an expert witness under the Expert Witness Testimony Review Program?" 95% of "experts" have not and will not likely in the future. Your use of a certified expert then carries that much more weight.
Paul White really did a disservice to the specialty with his testimony. Unfortunately, I know Paul personally and doubt he understands just how badly he made the community look with his statesments.
The key is to get the attorney to ask the question of the expert witness, "have you been certified by your national organization as an expert witness under the Expert Witness Testimony Review Program?" 95% of "experts" have not and will not likely in the future. Your use of a certified expert then carries that much more weight.
Paul White really did a disservice to the specialty with his testimony. Unfortunately, I know Paul personally and doubt he understands just how badly he made the community look with his statesments.
How do you get certified? Is it the ASA doing the certifying? What criteria do they base it on? Once certified, does it cover all subspecialties? For instance, would a certified expert witness who has no expertise in pediatrics trump an uncertified witness who subspecializes in pediatrics if the case pertains to pdeiatrics?
Sorry for all of the questions, just curious how that works. I think I recall you saying that you have reviewed cases before. Is it a rewarding experience (I mean professionally, not monetarily) or something you did not care for? It is difficult to be the bad guy who has to call out the practice of a peer.
I defended physicians that I knew were getting the shaft. Local lawyers know that I won't take a case as a hired gun. There has to be merit. Many times, I have told defendants to settle simply because I knew they were headed toward a waste of time and were actually at fault. I have not been certified as an expert witness but as my future remains clouded with my health situation, may consider it and restart my legal associations.
The money is OK, but I used these cases as a learning experience as well. It would amaze you to know what I've read about and seen going out in just about every type of medical environment you can imagine. It reemphasizes to me that there are not enough mechanisms in place to control the corruption and criminals that pervade the entire health care system.
Is pent sux tube standard of practice for critical AS, difficult airway, septic patients?
I would think it would be pretty hard to sleep at night if you were a hired gun asked to say whatever they told you to say.
Page 46 of the May ASA Newsletter is a full page story of the censure of Ronald L. Katz for his expert witness testimony that was found to be in violation of the ASA Guidelines for Expert Witness Qualifications and Testimony. It is an interesting read if you have time.
Curious to hear if this was who Dr Doze was referring to.
Page 46 of the May ASA Newsletter is a full page story of the censure of Ronald L. Katz for his expert witness testimony that was found to be in violation of the ASA Guidelines for Expert Witness Qualifications and Testimony. It is an interesting read if you have time.
Curious to hear if this was who Dr Doze was referring to.
I'm sure Katz will promptly sue the ASA and some idiot judge will force them to retract the censure.
Part of the reason that medical boards have such a hard time getting rid of ****ty doctors is because the incompetent docs hire lawyers to sue the board.
One of the contentious areas (according to the now-censured individual) was that an NGT was not placed prior to induction with an SBO, as discussed in this thread.