- Joined
- May 29, 2014
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh, and this is spine surgery we're talking about here, just to be clear.Yes, surgeons operate on people with factor xii deficiency. Wait until your appointment and discuss it with your surgeon.
Oh, and this is spine surgery we're talking about here, just to be clear.Yes, surgeons operate on people with factor xii deficiency. Wait until your appointment and discuss it with your surgeon.
Anytime.Thank you so much! I was afraid that I would be living with this radiculopathy for the rest of my life. I appreciate your response.
I figured as muchOh, and this is spine surgery we're talking about here, just to be clear.
Hi neusu, I've followed this thread for a long time. One resident on this forum recently posted that neurosurgeons are defined as people by their job. I know this is a grim view (and maybe offensive) but it got me a little worried. Family matters are probably not talked about around the hospital, but to the best of your knowledge, how does the work affect peoples' ability to be fathers, mothers, or just social? How do you think it would affect your life if you had a family? Thanks again!
Hello neusu,
Thanks for answers questions. I don't know if this has been asked before but how is bench neuroscience research, as opposed to clinical neurosurgery research, looked upon when applying to neurosurgery residency?
Thanks!!
Hey neusu how many hours does the average attending NS at your hospital work per week?
Do you happen to know who's the youngest board-certified neurosurgeon (or youngest that you know of)? Just curious.
What neurosurgery-related books have you read/would you recommend reading, to get a first-hand account of neurosurgery?
I've read "When the Air Hits Your Brain" by Frank Vertosick, "Another Day in the Frontal Lobe" by Katrina Firlik, "Brain Surgeon" by Keith Black, "Gifted Hands" by Ben Carson, "Monday Mornings" by Sanjay Gupta (more of a novel really but still lots of neurosurgery-related stuff).
What neurosurgery-related books have you read/would you recommend reading, to get a first-hand account of neurosurgery?
I've read "When the Air Hits Your Brain" by Frank Vertosick, "Another Day in the Frontal Lobe" by Katrina Firlik, "Brain Surgeon" by Keith Black, "Gifted Hands" by Ben Carson, "Monday Mornings" by Sanjay Gupta (more of a novel really but still lots of neurosurgery-related stuff).
The Frank Vertosick book is one of the best I've read - short, funny and candid. The part about the three longest years of an orthopedic surgeon's life: second grade...hilarious!!!!
Do left handed monkeys have the intestinal fortitude to operate though...I'm a pretty practical guy. Most of the surgical cases I do, I rationalize the case as my personal involvement. We as surgeons do a wonderful job of keeping our feelings as humans out of the situation; we drape off the field, we minimize our time seeing the patient, we ameliorate our losses.
As an MS1, try on neurosurgery, see if you like it. We can teach a left handed monkey to operate. We need neurosurgeons who can operate and talk to people on a personal level.
I've read "House of God" as well, and I agree it was funny/somewhat dark, but I can see why reading medical novels isn't the most interesting given that's what you do most of the day too. The Vertosick book is also quite good, and as death prophet said funny as well. Interestingly, both Firlik and Vertosick went to the same residency program (although years apart), seems like that program produces authors.
So how many panties have dropped after learning you were a neurosurgeon? Excluding the times which were preceded by, "I have to do a rectal exam on you."
Also you mentioned earlier that an undergrad was helping with research--but exactly what is their role with clinical research? Does he understand any of it?
Do left handed monkeys have the intestinal fortitude to operate though...
Any publications > no publications
Bench research > clinical research
@neusu Are you currently doing any research?
why is bench research > clinical research? a neurosurgery resident friend of mine mentioned when he interviewed for his current spot, there was a guy with a first author 1 nature pub, and he had 20+ clinical pubs. He told me the same thing...that the first author 1 nature pub was probably viewed more highly than his 20+ neuro/neurosurg. clinical pubs (some first author as well, but all clinical). Why is this?
For the most part, bench research is more "pure" than clinical research. It takes more thought to understand a concept, devise an experiment, conduct the experiment, interpret the data, and explain the results in a meaningful way. Bench research often costs more money because the actual lab space/equipment/personnel are devoted to research whereas many clinical studies are conducted on patients who already would have been treated. This requires significant investment either by the University or department and often is the result of outside grant funding. Likewise, research from the bench tends to lead to larger clinical breakthroughs and understanding than clinical research. There are more basic science researchers than clinical researchers. The journals are more widely read and, for the "big" journals, cited more often. This is more impressive.
So I have a wicked case of cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis). It was induced by a drug called lamictal. I've had the condition for about 2 1/2 years now. I get Botox injections every three months, but they just barely curb the dystonic "storms," and the last round just made my neck more stiff, but I still have the un-voluntary urges to contort my neck. They have tried klonpin, diazepam, and Xanax to help with the "storms." Xanax seems to work the best, but it's starting to get to the point where nothing is working. My neuro tried to give me Orap, but there's no way in hell I'm taking it. It's getting ridiculous. I'm in severe, chronic pain, and I can't get any relief. Does anyone have any suggestions? Please?
Do you know who Dr. David Levy is?
Yes.
@neusu When you guys have a trauma coming in and they need surgery fast do you guys take less time to scrub in or no matter what you guys still follow the normal scrub procedure(more time)?
Edit: Ooooh you are now Mr. Chief resident, nice.
LOL It's whatever to me. As you can see I joke about it. After all, it's not the first time my question has gotten skipped.I think he's just going in order.
Thank you for your answer.When there is a trauma that needs to go up NOW, we tend to move faster. Every patient still gets the pertinent ED stablization: ABCs, imaging, etc. We call the OR and make it clear they needed to be up there 30-minutes ago, and get them up as soon as possible. We scrub the same for every case as a standard precaution. Traditional scrubbing is less common now-a-days with the advent of waterless scrubbing.
The difference between our emergencies and other services emergencies is rather stark. Certainly vascular and trauma can have patients that need to be in the OR immediately or the patient will die. More often though, most "emergent" cases can be postponed hours to a day. With neurosurgical emergencies, by the time the issue is discovered it is often almost too late.
What is the lifestyle like of a neurosurgeon? Do you have time for family? Can medical school + residency be done while raising a child?
Have you seen a functional/pain surgeon? There are procedures we can do for medical refractory torticollis.
Alternatively, have you tried walking bakwards?
It wasn't factor XII Deficiency. I have antiphospholipid antibodies in my attacking my platelets. The hematologist said it's like APS, without the actual syndrome. So, the prolonged PTT was actually paradoxical, like a false positive. I actually clot more then I'm supposed to. For now, I do nothing, not even a low-dose aspirin, and I'm cleared for surgery.Were you operating or a patient?
Former, you should know the answer. Latter, ask your doc.
Ah makes sense now. Thanks! Is a co-author bench paper better than a co-author clinical paper similarly? Or just first authorships?
What distinguish surgeons performing real complex (and rare) procedures from other?
My impression is that the one perfoming the most complex surgical cases are the one who is also performing the research on it. What is your impression? I can see two scenario:
1) Surgeon had the magic hands -> got the most complex procedure and started doing research.
2) The surgeon had an interest in the disease and therefore choosed to operate mainly on it. For example, John Cameron, with over 2000 Whipple procedures, choosed to do refine the procedure not because he had the great hands, rather he was interested to see how much one could refine/reduce the complications of the procedure.
Second, could you just describe what a typical learning curve could look like? Let's say you have completed residency and should start learning a procedure you have only seen but not done any practical step on.
No question but mad props for answering questions for 2 whole years!!
Do you know practicing surgeons who have herniated lumbar discs? In your opinion, would someone with an asymptomatic herniated disc be fit for surgical specialties, specifically neurosurgery?
What do you think about how he integrates prayer with his practice?