- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,012
- Reaction score
- 813
I think most programs would define "ranked to match" as the applicant's rank being within the program's quota (Ranks #1-4 when the quota is 4). The applicant is guaranteed to match at the program if the applicant ranks the program first. Beyond that, I think it would be more honest for a program to say "likely to match" rather than "ranked to match" and that rank number would vary significantly from program to program and specialty to specialty depending on the size and competitiveness of the program. So don't worry too much about that part--just rank according to where you want to be while giving due consideration to all of the factors that are most important to your success and happiness as a resident. Then trust that the process will work.
I know of an instance where the words "ranked to match" were used in the sense that the applicant was ranked within the extent of the list that almost always ends up matching (e.g. 50th in a program that usually goes to 80 on their rank), and that applicant didn't match the program. I don't think it's said with any malignant intention, but I agree with thinking it's less than honest. I think the movement by medicine and med/peds programs to refrain from post-interview love letters is a noble one. It's turned me off from the handful of programs who have sent love letters out given the current shift away from it.
Since OP is applying in Surgery I hope your version is accurate for her. It's just that I've never had a chair be involved enough in the day-to-day to even really meet individual candidates, let alone want one. This has been at academic powerhouse programs where the Chairs have been <20% clinical, and less academic regional campus-type programs where the Chairs have been based far away, at the "mothership."
My experience in med/peds has been much more in line with yours - the chairs of medicine/peds usually drop in and show their faces, but they didn't interview at any programs. If they have much input on who gets ranked, it would be just based on their notions of applicants on paper