- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 65
I am trying to put a DIY post bacc together, but I am having conflicting thoughts regarding astronomy classes. Does it look bad if I take Astro 1 & 2 just to bump that sGPA?
I am trying to put a DIY post bacc together, but I am having conflicting thoughts regarding astronomy classes. Does it look bad if I take Astro 1 & 2 just to bump that sGPA?
You're calling this a physics class I'm assuming? Meh...I wouldn't...
AAMC explicitly lists Astronomy in the lIst of BCPM courses, under physics. It's fine.
I think it's fine, if you can work it in amongst the other courses. Regular pre-meds often take GPA-boosting science courses, I don't see why that's so taboo for a DIY postbacc. 2 classes won't raise your GPA that much but if you find it interesting, it can't hurt. You obviously need all the pre-reqs and you should throw some upper level science in there too.
I think the issue is in postbacc, there is a direct connection to to showing preparedness for medical school and the "classic" view of premeds being good at biology related courses still predominates. Particularly with postbacc, where applicants are more likely had a need to improve GPA, and thus invite more scrutiny, that it may raise the question "why did this applicant take astronomy?" Unanswered questions being pondered by an adcom are a dangerous thing.
Yes.
Take Anatomy, Physiology, Med Micro, Neuroscience etc.
Do you really think that if you're faking your grades that you'll do well in med school? We ne4ed to know that you can survive a med school curriculum. YOU need to know it!
So quit thinking like a freshman pre-med.