- Joined
- Oct 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 0
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
I heard Harvard is top notch...wait...
How do you not give opinion when someone is asking for your...well, opinion? Even the rankings are opinion. Sure, they are backed up by this and that but, in the end, someone decided, "hey, I like this school better than that school..."
Yes, Harvard is indeed the best.
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
If I hear the answer, "whichever one you get into" Ill likely put my hand through this screen in the attempt to knock the **** out of whomever said it.
If I hear the answer, "whichever one you get into" Ill likely put my hand through this screen in the attempt to knock the **** out of whomever said it.
If I hear the answer, "whichever one you get into" Ill likely put my hand through this screen in the attempt to knock the **** out of whomever said it.
I've said it once, and I'll say it again:
Go on your interviews and decide for yourself.
Someone's dream school could be your nightmare. Go on your interviews without any preconceived notions regarding rankings and judge them based on your own criteria for the "best" school and you will find a school that is best for you.
While I've been preaching this philosophy, I feel that it is dangerous.
It reminds me of freshman year living in the dorms of East Halls (the "ghetto" or "projects" of PSU). When the parents came to visit on a parent's weekend, the food was all carefully prepared, everything was spotless, the people were all nice, etc etc etc.
When the parents (read: MS prospectives) left things went back to normal.
Isn't it a distinct possibility that med schools aren't as nice as their PR cheerleaders make them out to be... in particular, for lower tier schools (sorry, i will prob go to a "lower tier" school so don't shoot me).
I am really asking...maybe this ^^^ has very little effect. You can't fake good cadaver labs or fudge numbers such as MS/cadaver or build a facade for a high-tech micro lab etc. etc. etc.
Comments, please!
Such lies. i can name 25 schools which give you a better osteopathic education than Harvard!
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
It would be wrong to think that most people think the US News rankings are total crap, regardless of how random it may seem. Top 50 schools get respect, the closer to #1 the better. It's kind of like the top 25 in college football, maybe USC should be #1 and maybe they really are #3. It may be "abstract" to a point, but no one would argue the assertion USC is better than Stanford or Duke. On the same token, who in here really believes MSU-COM is less deserving of #4 than say, pikeville? There is no way to rank schools perfectly, so US News is like our Associated Press. I'm happy there's some DO schools out there getting respect whether they really are #4, #28... or not.
I think the problem people have with those rankings is that they don't rank them according to the characteristics that you value. So a school is #10 in Primary Care?? If a person has no interest in primary care, then that school is actually at the bottom of his/her list.
Moral of the story (Same DAMN moral of the story in every single one of these threads): Go to the school that fits YOUR (not Tom or Peggy) needs.
1000. LECOM-Erie
Hah, I do not think I am going to disagree here. Talk about a school that has absolutely no personality at all. The interview and the interviewers were just indicative of this overall "feeling" the school gives off.
Medical schools teach the basics of primary care, whether your plan is primary care or not. Post-graduate training programs all stem from and require the knowledge of primary care. Therefore, the learning of primary care is applicable to all.
Aww LECOM never gets any love. Scpod where are you?
But the major contributing factor for why these schools made it on those rankings is because of the shear number of primary care physicians they push out. How does that indicate better training than any other school??
Anyone know what the best osteopathic schools are. Not opinion, but does anyone know the facts? Thanks.
Don't forget that I'm in Bradenton. We have lot's of personality. And, we have girls in bikinis in November!!! They might have the same first name, but there are quite a lot of differences between the two Lecoms ...or has the "sub-zero" temperature in DesMoines really gotten to you
OK...we're in a bit of a cold spell now, since the high will only be 78 degrees on Sunday, but we'll be back to 86 by Tuesday.
The point you made, though, is the best one. You need to "test drive" your school to see if you really are comfortable in the driver's seat. You are ultimately responsible for your own education...no if's, and's or but's.
If it was simply based on percentage pushed into primary care you'd have a lot more DO schools making the cut. You'd probably see Ponce up there too.
Whether the rankings are a true representation of the actual best schools in order doesn't matter. If your school gets recognized year after year, there's a reason and people take note. Most people asked would tell you Harvard or Hopkins is a top program in the country. Why? because this "abstract" ranking tells us year after year this is the case.
Ranking doesn't mean everything, but to say it has no value is just as ignorant. You know whether you go to a top 50 DO school or not, people here are proud when a DO school is ranked up there with the best of them. It's good for the profession. People notice.
So you are saying that people believe that Harvard is a top-notch program because of some ranking system and not its prestige of being one of the oldest schools in the nation? I think I may have to disagree with you here. The number of Noble Prize winners and just purely famous people who graduated from Harvard, I think, is what makes the school stick in a person's mind. The ranking could go to **** and people would still use a Harvard graduate as a reference in a movie for a very intelligent person.
If it was simply based on percentage pushed into primary care you'd have a lot more DO schools making the cut. You'd probably see Ponce up there too.
Whether the rankings are a true representation of the actual best schools in order doesn't matter. If your school gets recognized year after year, there's a reason and people take note. Most people asked would tell you Harvard or Hopkins is a top program in the country. Why? because this "abstract" ranking tells us year after year this is the case.
Ranking doesn't mean everything, but to say it has no value is just as ignorant. You know whether you go to a top 50 DO school or not, people here are proud when a DO school is ranked up there with the best of them. It's good for the profession. People notice.
I think you're misinterpreting my post. I, personally, am not saying that the Rankings are completely useless. I'm also NOT saying that those schools made the primary care list ONLY because they push out a very, very large percentage of primary care docs. I said that it was a major contributing factor. Do you honestly believe that a school that only sends 35% of its students into primary care positions would make that list, even if they provide superb primary care training?? Of course not. I don't know the exact criteria that they use to rank the primary care schools, but I'm willing to go out on a limb and guess that percentage of students that go into primary care positions is high on the list.
The rankings have some merit and can be helpful to some people. If you think that every other school (especially DO) doesn't heavily train you in the primary care skills, then I believe you are mistaken.
I just ask that you don't put words in my mouth and misconstrue what I'm really trying to say here. All of those schools are fantastic schools, I just don't think the rankings imply that they are the best schools for everyone.
The best school is the one that grants you admissions, problem solved!
DO schools all have high percentages going into primary care so that makes your assertion of pushing primary care neglible.
Not true
Some DO schools have percentages of graduates pursuing primary care in the 30s.