- Joined
- Apr 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,171
- Reaction score
- 863
BP at Neck vs. Calves
TBR page 88 #23
Intuitively (without thinking of formulas), it makes sense that BP at the calves is greater since it experiences all the pressure of the fluid from the upper body.
TBR’s explanation using Bernoulli's formula is somewhat confusing to me.
P + rho*g*h + ½ (rho)v^2 = constant
TBR says that you can take the flow velocity (v) to be somewhat similar between the two situations. If you do this, then the resulting conclusions make sense.
But how can you make that assumption? If the BP at the calves is actually greater, won’t the velocity of the blood in the calves simply compensate for that increased pressure (either go up or down)?
Similarly, if the BP at the neck is lower, won’t the velocity of the blood in the neck simply compensate for the decreased pressure? After all, isn’t velocity is dependent on pressure differences?
TBR page 88 #23
Intuitively (without thinking of formulas), it makes sense that BP at the calves is greater since it experiences all the pressure of the fluid from the upper body.
TBR’s explanation using Bernoulli's formula is somewhat confusing to me.
P + rho*g*h + ½ (rho)v^2 = constant
TBR says that you can take the flow velocity (v) to be somewhat similar between the two situations. If you do this, then the resulting conclusions make sense.
But how can you make that assumption? If the BP at the calves is actually greater, won’t the velocity of the blood in the calves simply compensate for that increased pressure (either go up or down)?
Similarly, if the BP at the neck is lower, won’t the velocity of the blood in the neck simply compensate for the decreased pressure? After all, isn’t velocity is dependent on pressure differences?