Comquest vs Combank

[AnonymousD.O.]

Yes, I am aware this thread has been done before. BUT, because COMQUEST is relatively new and the latest thread on this is about 2 years old, I think another thread is justified.

What are your thoughts?

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[DocEspana]

Fielders choice. Neither one will give you actual comlex questions you'll actually be seeing and both cover all the topics at a roughly appropriate complexity.

 

[Trogghunter]

Comquest >>combank was the adage for 2012 step 1, combank>comquest for 2013 step 2.

 

[JustPlainBill]

Took Level 3 in 2012 and Comquest was the way to go...almost as if they had channeled question writers -- Studied less and bumped the score by 90 or so points....If I had used them instead of Kaplan, for Level 1, I'd be in EM right now....

 

[Makati2008]

Took Level 3 in 2012 and Comquest was the way to go...almost as if they had channeled question writers -- Studied less and bumped the score by 90 or so points....If I had used them instead of Kaplan, for Level 1, I'd be in EM right now....

Cool. I think I will use comquest as well.

 

[HooliganSnail]

Comquest has the better OMT questions, and my COMLEX exams were very heavy with OMT

 

[cliquesh]

Do both. I did all of the comquest questions in 2 days. They are short.

 

[Makati2008]

Do both. I did all of the comquest questions in 2 days. They are short.

Oh are the explainations short too?

 

[AnonymousD.O.]

So far it really seems that comquest is the way to go

 

[cliquesh]

Oh are the explainations short too?

If I recall correctly, they are about a paragraph.

The more questions you do the better you will do on the actual exam.