- Joined
- Jun 30, 2011
- Messages
- 135
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey guys,
I know that Crack DAT PAT is close to the real test than Kaplan
I used to get 20-21 in Kaplan and 18-19 in Crack DAT PAT
but I am wondering if the Hole Punches and Angle ranking is that hard in the real test as Crack DAT PAT?
I am getting 14/15 in Key Holes and 15/15 in Top Front End view or a little bit less sometimes
but I am getting 5-6 wrong in hole punches and 4 wrong in the angle ranking with consuming so much time in the Hole Punches and this is affecting my Folding section
Even the Cube counting I feel it is really tricky in the Crack DAT PAT
for those who took the real test what do you think about each one of those in Crack DAT PAT comparing to the real test: Angle Ranking, Hole punches and Cube Counting
I know that Crack DAT PAT is close to the real test than Kaplan
I used to get 20-21 in Kaplan and 18-19 in Crack DAT PAT
but I am wondering if the Hole Punches and Angle ranking is that hard in the real test as Crack DAT PAT?
I am getting 14/15 in Key Holes and 15/15 in Top Front End view or a little bit less sometimes
but I am getting 5-6 wrong in hole punches and 4 wrong in the angle ranking with consuming so much time in the Hole Punches and this is affecting my Folding section
Even the Cube counting I feel it is really tricky in the Crack DAT PAT
for those who took the real test what do you think about each one of those in Crack DAT PAT comparing to the real test: Angle Ranking, Hole punches and Cube Counting