- Joined
- Oct 12, 2012
- Messages
- 695
- Reaction score
- 115
Last edited:
Wow your surgical rotation blows. I'm glad I didn't have to deal with the crap I bolded up above. Most places are fine with you eating when you get the chance, and don't do this whole "be there before the other students!!" nonsense.
No you just had a different experience. That is exactly why when threads such as this one arise, it is important to recognize that while the OP needs to vent, the experience isn't the same for everyone. As I've said often before, my experience on Peds was much more unpleasant than on Surgery when I was a student.
In residency, our students always had morning and evening rounds, you could not wear scrubs except when on Trauma, and lunches were not guaranteed (and there was no physician lounge even if we did eat). Students did tend to get 8 hours of sleep even when "on call" because there was a stupid rule that they only had to stay until 1030 pm.
So many people in page after page complained about what their surgical rotation was like and I was in the hopes that me putting some time into a post like I did would help them know what could be ahead and not catch them off guard and have them complaining so much. Many personality types in surgery would be offended if the student comes in and expects it to be like any other rotation. I had many months of surgical rotations in different hospitals and I put in what was expected of me to do well.
If some of the other students that have been on a 9-5 surgical rotation want to chime in, great. If their rotations were easier than mine, good for them. If they were closer to what I outlined, they really shouldn't be complaining and this thread has gone on for too many pages. If you're doing an audition rotation, everything counts and what I posted is DEFINITELY not out of the norm. Show up enough times at 5AM with other students you're competing with halfway through their first coffee and you learn how to adapt. If anyone else has been on a sub-I neurosurgery, derm-onc surgery, vascular surgery and trauma surgery rotation and wants to post about it, I highly encourage it.
Feel free to ignore my posts, especially ljn. It takes less than a minute to ignore all of my posts forever. I wish the rest of you the best of luck and hope that your schedule isn't the same as I had for many, many months.
We had morning rounds but in the evening the most we did was run through the patient list (if that). Evening rounds just sounds terrible.
The schedule is definitely part of the hazing process until you realize that the intern or PGY1 you spend most of your time with as an MS3 or MS4 is on such a schedule and they won't like seeing you yawn or groan if you're still there at 5:01PM. I had one away rotation where the MS3 basic surgery rotation people were either on service or on call every day and pretty much never left the hospital. I don't think either one of them was even going into surgery, but they had to cancel a lot of their plans to visit or have visitors because they thought it would be a typical IM/FP schedule of 7AM to 5PM. Doing a surgical rotation right after a Psych rotation is the worst wake up call. Ouch!
Bottom line, you may not be going into the field you have to rotate through, but if you have realistic expectations of what you're getting into, especially your first surgical rotation, you'll be able to plan for it, and that way the main idea of my post. I've had pretty good luck with my contributions on SDN, but there are the few that argue just to argue or pick apart something just because they have nothing better to do. I guess it's time to take a break.
Enjoy your 8-5 surgical rotations.
Eh...they were usually pretty quick and comprised mostly of reading notes from consults put in during the day, doing post-op checks, and making sure everything was ready for sign out. We aren't talking about mediciney type rounds.
The schedule is definitely part of the hazing process until you realize that the intern or PGY1 you spend most of your time with as an MS3 or MS4 is on such a schedule and they won't like seeing you yawn or groan if you're still there at 5:01PM.
.
I don't think everyone is disagreeing with your assessment of what does and does not annoy surgeons, I think they're disagreeing with your perspective. You seem to think 'surgeons hate to see you eat, sleep, sit, or yawn, therefore you shouldn't do those things'. Meanwhile the other posters in this thread argue 'Surgeons don't like to see you eat, sleep, sit, or yawn, therefore f--k surgery'.
To be honest, if you need to get up at 3:00 a.m., work and starve until 10 p.m., and smile through the whole thing (without yawning) to impress somene enough that they'll let you do it all AGAIN for 5-10 more years of residency and fellowship (at minimum wage!) that should be a sign that this career is not worth the price of admssion.
I don't think everyone is disagreeing with your assessment of what does and does not annoy surgeons, I think they're disagreeing with your perspective. You seem to think 'surgeons hate to see you eat, sleep, sit, or yawn, therefore you shouldn't do those things'. Meanwhile the other posters in this thread argue 'Surgeons don't like to see you eat, sleep, sit, or yawn, therefore f--k surgery'.
To be honest, if you need to get up at 3:00 a.m., work and starve until 10 p.m., and smile through the whole thing (without yawning) to impress somene enough that they'll let you do it all AGAIN for 5-10 more years of residency and fellowship (at minimum wage!) that should be a sign that this career is not worth the price of admssion.
Agreed but I actually love his posts because they provide the comic book villain that makes it enjoyable to sling obscenities at in retrospective catharsis. Rather than this lot of measured, polite, surgical apologists and PR people who put up such a concerted front precisely to avoid associative identity with the not so few Gimps out there that typify the surgical hoohah machismo. The type that think its so awesome to be them that they can describe a litany of biblical proportions of sacrifices of exactly how you might just be them if you're just so lucky.
Like a 35 y/o with a mullet and popped collar driving a camaro and bragging about how much they bench press to a snickering crowd of teeneagers.
Really. It's douche performance art par excellence.
I was aware that cross-posting questions was in violation of the TOS, but not that posting helpful information from one area in another was. I apologize for that.Thank you for the offer and the education, but as a SURGICAL ATTENDING and SDN MODERATOR/ADMINISTRATOR, I do not have that luxury. I am well aware of what surgical rotations are like having done them as a student, resident, fellow and now attending. If your comment was not directed toward me, then I apologize (but when you quote someone, usually what follows is meant as a response to them).
I am not saying that your post is not warranted or valuable, however:
1) if you have already posted this in the NSGY subforum, crossposting it here is a TOS violation;
2) this thread was not about "what is my surgical core" going to be like, nor was anyone asking that, therefore it seems misplaced. Perhaps its just my impression.
3) you might want to ramp down the rancor; it does not serve you well
I was aware that cross-posting questions was in violation of the TOS, but not that posting helpful information from one area in another was. I apologize for that.
I saw the complaints as unrealistic expectations met with in a stress that maybe could be avoided if the users could see what was possible.
The offer of ignoring my posts was not directed at you at all, it was at users that like to pick apart people's efforts that take time away from other things in the act of being helpful. They are definitely free to ignore my posts if they feel that strongly against them.
I didn't return the continued attacks in kind, but if it my comments were out of line, I apologize for that. It seems strange that other members that have had little or no experience in this area seem fit to comment on a subject such as this, but maybe I am mistaken.
Agreed but I actually love his posts because they provide the comic book villain that makes it enjoyable to sling obscenities at in retrospective catharsis. Rather than this lot of measured, polite, surgical apologists and PR people who put up such a concerted front precisely to avoid associative identity with the not so few Gimps out there that typify the surgical hoohah machismo. The type that think its so awesome to be them that they can describe a litany of biblical proportions of sacrifices of exactly how you might just be them if you're just so lucky.
Like a 35 y/o with a mullet and popped collar driving a camaro and bragging about how much they bench press to a snickering crowd of teeneagers.
Really. It's douche performance art par excellence.
I truly love the poetic nature of your posts.
For other students in this thread: Don't be too surprised that surgery (and surgery subspecialty) residents are coming into this thread and making inflammatory statements. After all, it is simply a defensive retort to a thread telling them to "go f#$% yourselves."
Certainly, as you go farther in your training, life gets harder. TheProwler has much more on his plate than the average MS3, and studying/tests never go away. If anything, the consequences of not studying become greater with time (getting fired/dismissed, failing boards/not being able to practice, killing patients) .
However, I don't think heavy responsibility and a hard lifestyle should give the resident license to be an a-hole. I think the "surgical apologists" in this thread have done a good job of demonstrating the more proper way to behave.
Like any group, we don't enjoy being typecasted, and we don't believe it is fair or accurate to make blanket statements about a group as heterogeneous as surgery (and surgery subspecialty) residents. It's no different than saying "Dear nurses" or "dear medical students" or "dear left-handed people."
Once again, I have to warn students that those with the most angry, narrow-minded behavior during med school are the ones most likely to turn into the stereotypes that they hate. It is their destiny.
I applaud the other residents for maintaining their composure in light of such commentary from people they help train and this attending for going to bat for us.
I have never before seen an SDN thread started with the intention of telling Residents to go F themselves, then allowed to go on after asking "Why are these people such epic c*nts?" Whomever is moderating this thread, please, PLEASE close it before this rift gets drawn out any further.
Agreed, if you close down the venting of frustrations, it would imply that it's bad to ever vent about surgery. Constructive conversations like the ones in this thread are very helpful to see BOTH sides and to see the rights/wrongs of both sides. I'm sure the surgery residents want to know how the other side feels, as well as the med students and how residents feel.
With the exception of that cringeworthy neurosurgeon(who i don't think came back after one post...he would blow a fuse if I was his med student xD), all the surgery residents/attendings who posted here have been helpful.
For every surgical resident we hear whining about how much they hate knowing how to manage diabetes or every medical resident who complains about taking care of psych patients... ugh.
I applaud the other residents for maintaining their composure in light of such commentary from people they help train and this attending for going to bat for us.
I have never before seen an SDN thread started with the intention of telling Residents to go F themselves, then allowed to go on after asking "Why are these people such epic c*nts?" Whomever is moderating this thread, please, PLEASE close it before this rift gets drawn out any further.
With the exception of that cringeworthy neurosurgeon(who i don't think came back after one post...he would blow a fuse if I was his med student xD), all the surgery residents/attendings who posted here have been helpful.
Hardly cringeworthy, and for the record I do not yell or dress down students/residents in front of the team.
If my post was offensive perhaps you need to reevaluate as to why you are offended. I suspect it is defensiveness from identifying yourself with the students I am criticizing is the underlying issue.
Having rotated at a site that was definitely abusive and had those exaggerations of what people tend to characterize as the "surgical personality", I've tried to become more involved with med students and their education while they rotate through the service. Through our rotation, the medical students don't have that bucket of supplies to carry around during rounds. They are expected to see the patients on the floor and come up with plans for them each day. The plans are then compared with the intern's plans and if time allows then the rationale for the difference is explained. The interns teach the med students with their own formatted lectures, as well as go over patients and the algorithms when on call or in clinic.Why are these people such epic c*nts?
I'm so bothered by surgery all I can do is make a list of phrases that sum it up:
1. trickle-down abuse
2. passive aggression
3. silence
4. eye contact avoidance
5. glorified supply caddy
6. sarcasm
7. disingenuous
8. Schadenfreude
9. defenselessness
So sometimes it bothers me to see MSIII's (or MSIV's, who are often more problematic) who take the attitude of that above. Too often I've run into students who peripherally round on only one patient, or disappear for an entire day, or skip out on assigned call, or any number of disrespectful behaviors towards the residents that try to make it a learning environment. For as much generalization I see about the flaws in a surgeon's character, is there any introspection from the med student (or considering how the thread evolved, among residents in other fields)?
While the abusive rotation full of "surgery personalities" was not enjoyable emotionally, I learned a great deal about surgical patients, and never saw medical students dare to do the kind of things I've been seeing at my current institution. Sometimes I feel like I'm being taken advantage of as a result of avoiding that stereotypical personality.
I do often hear people talk about how they're not going into surgery anyway, but I still have a hard time accepting that as a good reason for students to do some of the things they do. Medicine doctors still should know the basics of working up a patient. Everyone has their stories of terrible consults (being consulted on whether a patient has a TDC or a Port-a-Cath comes to mind), and I do think a lot of those stem from physicians not willing to learn about what they consider "another field".I will say, I do think that the eclectic nature of what you learn on a surgical rotations makes the rotators more hostile than the hours or residents alone justifies. I honestly think medical students do have a pretty good idea of what knowledge bases they do and don't need to develop for their chosen fields, and they can be incredibly apathetic about the less useful ones. I could imainge that would offend anyone who was genuinely trying to teach. I think that students would be better behaved on a medicine rotation of similar quality and character.
Having rotated at a site that was definitely abusive and had those exaggerations of what people tend to characterize as the "surgical personality", I've tried to become more involved with med students and their education while they rotate through the service. Through our rotation, the medical students don't have that bucket of supplies to carry around during rounds. They are expected to see the patients on the floor and come up with plans for them each day. The plans are then compared with the intern's plans and if time allows then the rationale for the difference is explained. The interns teach the med students with their own formatted lectures, as well as go over patients and the algorithms when on call or in clinic.
So sometimes it bothers me to see MSIII's (or MSIV's, who are often more problematic) who take the attitude of that above. Too often I've run into students who peripherally round on only one patient, or disappear for an entire day, or skip out on assigned call, or any number of disrespectful behaviors towards the residents that try to make it a learning environment. For as much generalization I see about the flaws in a surgeon's character, is there any introspection from the med student (or considering how the thread evolved, among residents in other fields)?
While the abusive rotation full of "surgery personalities" was not enjoyable emotionally, I learned a great deal about surgical patients, and never saw medical students dare to do the kind of things I've been seeing at my current institution. Sometimes I feel like I'm being taken advantage of as a result of avoiding that stereotypical personality.
Likewise, why take your interaction with certain surgeons personally? In a way, that's my original point. Surgery is often labelled as the field that has a lot of a-holes, when the reality is that you can make such (or the same) broad generalizations about anyone in the hospital - med students included.Why are you taking it personally? It seems to me they're doing more harm to those med students who do show up on time ready to work. Surely, your job is easier or most certainly not dependent on their attendance. Write a note about their behavior to the clerkship director or whoever does the evals and move on with your very busy days.
I mean, I never did any of those things, worked hard and only was graded average in surgery because I didn't study the cases overnight, to be prepared for pimping that was thoroughly irrelevant to the shelf exam. And somewhere off the map entirely of my chosen profession. This didn't bother me. The people who wanted surgery went for that stick with gusto. I have little ability to feign interest in academic minutia of a field that doesn't bear fruit for my future. But I was always interested in the medical management of surgical patients.
We should have little to disagree about. There's a lot of a-holes in surgery. What makes it worse is the ultra competitive exchange between those interested in it and those doing it. The rest of us just have to stand around and wait for the curtain call. And celebrate our exodus from it. Which is what this thread is about. Deal with it. The same way I dealt with you guys for 8 weeks. And another 4 before I'm done.
We know there's plenty of slackers who have dangerous attitudes towards their responsibilities. Deal them a failure or a bad eval. I won't defend them. Or take it personally.
Make a thread about it. I'd read it with interest.
My plans for being at your level is to take anyone interested under my wing, regard performance matter-of-factly, and to not give a crap about the young surgeons or whathaveyou of the disintersted that almost invariably can't stand my field.
Your solution towards troublesome med students is individualized, so why is your solution towards troublesome surgery residents so generalized? You didn't "deal with me" for 8 weeks. You dealt with a specific group of people that I have no connection to outside of taking the same exams.
Likewise, why take your interaction with certain surgeons personally? In a way, that's my original point. Surgery is often labelled as the field that has a lot of a-holes, when the reality is that you can make such (or the same) broad generalizations about anyone in the hospital - med students included.
Your solution towards troublesome med students is individualized, so why is your solution towards troublesome surgery residents so generalized? You didn't "deal with me" for 8 weeks. You dealt with a specific group of people that I have no connection to outside of taking the same exams.
Love it.
There comes a point during training, or afterward when you are an attending, where you realize that students don't necessarily have a strong understanding of what is relevant and what is not. Then, there comes another point where you realize that being liked is less important than ensuring the quality of the student's education. Some residents, desperate for validation, will become pushovers who sacrifice the substance of their educational opportunities in order to be labeled the "cool resident," and that really bothers me.
Because of their inexperience, students are not really in a position to definitively label an activity or exercise as "low yield" or "high yield." Typically they will label things that suck as "low yield" and easy activities that simultaneously celebrate their awesomeness as "high yield." Pretty much anything that is hard, takes time, is uncomfortable, requires an early start, etc. is low yield by their measurements.
Now, certainly surgeons-in-training suffer from the same near-sightedness, and they can't always identify the most educational activities for themselves or for the students they supervise.
I agree with those who believe it's an imperfect system. However, I disagree with those who believe it's wise to ignore areas of medicine that they've determined to be irrelevant to their career choice, because they don't really possess the amount of experience necessary to understand what their future entails.
Regarding perspective, I've had the luxury of being a medical student, a surgical resident, a fellow, and an attending. I've also worked in multiple different practice environments, including the urban academic center, county hospital with bullets whizzing by, cush community hospital, etc. During my time, I've utilized a great deal of knowledge that I gained on my core MS3 clerkships in areas other than surgery.
I don't believe that I've forgotten what it's like to be a student. I remember that time very well, including all the ups and downs, the unfair situations, the conflicting obligations, the feelings of irrelevance/ineptitude, the fatigue, etc. Instead, I've gained experience that has allowed a better understanding of the situation. And, at my current level as a junior attending, I still have a lot to learn.
I think it would be quite naive to assume that all changes in behavior as one progresses in training are due to forgetting what it's like to be in the previous role. Even the most self-absorbed student must concede that increased experience and maturity play a role here.
:I think it would be quite naive to assume that all changes in behavior as one progresses in training are due to forgetting what it's like to be in the previous role. Even the most self-absorbed student must concede that increased experience and maturity play a role here.
Anytime maturity and experience advises a course of action that just happens to be the most convenient and self affirming for the voice of maturity and experience, I consider it suspect. I think premeds, medical students, and residents genearlly have a much clearer view of what is and is not necessary for their education than the attendings, particularly attendings who are also academic faculty. While experience and maturity plays a role in their decision making, unfortunately ennui, cognitive dissonance, and a lifetime of institutionalization probably play a greater role.
Doesn't it bother you how the correct course NEVER seems to be to change the system? Our system of medical education (other than residency) has been essentially frozen in amber for nearly a century now. It was designed at a time when the vast majority of residents were general practitioners in small towns, when most of our modern specialties didn't exist, when tertiary care didn't exist because there was no way to evacuate anyone to them, and in fact when most of what we do now would have been considered science fiction. Yet we do almost exactly the same rotatons for the same amount of time. Doesn't that suggest that, maybe, the attendings who are in charge of the system have somewhat of a bias in maintaining the status quo rather than adapting to new circumstances? That maybe they need the perspective of students who aren't as biased towards the current system of education?
Totally disagree with the bolded. Most medical students need to be disabused of preconceptions more than they need to be protected from the capriciousness of personality. Myself included.
It honestly surprises me that you still feel this way now that you're on the other side as a resident. Were your clerkships really that malignant, or... what? The vast majority of medical faculty/residents that I've worked with seemed to understand the position of a student quite well, were very reasonable about what they expected you to be responsible for, and were perfectly happy to engage us at the level of what we really needed to take away from the service to whatever our future plans were, provided the student appeared interested in knowing these things.
Honestly, your solution of medical training on the trade school model threatens to further compartmentalize the profession, reinforcing the institutionalization you so abhor. It certainly won't help with what interdepartmental rancor is already out there.
Like I said, to me a big sign that our medical school is not suited to our current system of medicine isn't just that its broad, its that its broad in the exact same way that it was 100 years ago. The same length of education, the same organic chemistry class, the same 8 week surgery rotation. If we wanted to avoid conflicts why not rotate through the departments that we more routinely have conlicts with, like the ED, radiology, and pathology? You can be a medical school without having rotations in any of those things. For that matter what about having us rotate through nursing, billing, social work, case management, or legal? We have almost daily fights with those people, after all, while most teams hardly ever argue with their surgical consults.
I'm not sure I'm offering the best solution, but when you talk to the entrenched faculty the solution always seems to be 'stay the course'. I'm not sure I have the right solution but I'm almost certain that wrong solution is to keep doing the same thing the same way, forever and ever
Ok I agree you have to speak up for procedures. However, except surgical rotations, procedures are somewhat rare at my school.
Sometimes. But, give me 20 minutes with uptodate + medscape, 90% of the time I will get a much more complete answer than any attending could provide off the top of their head. If we are doing something which doesn't agree with what I read then it makes sense to ask questions. However, again this would produce very few questions and make me look 'uninterested.'
Taking blood to the lab. Making appointment for patients for my resident's pt I am not even following. Refilling paper in the printer. Getting the resident's lunch.
I obviously know how to walk. Likewise I know how to talk on the phone. This isn't teaching me crap. It is simply the resident abusing the med student so they have less work to do. I realize residents are overworked. Fine. But this 100% definitely isn't my job. Hire a personal assistant if you can't handle it yourself.
My point is my 'job' isn't to increase your productivity. I am a student, you are a paid employee. I pay ~$100+ a day to learn. Apart from procedures, I learn more going home and reading than following my resident around doing paperwork. Hell, even if they taught me to do the paperwork that would be fine, that would have a little educational value. However, me watching you put orders in on cross-cover pts I know nothing about is useless.
Bottom line, perception is king. For most med students perception (i.e. your grade) trumps learning.
I wonder what your thoughts about this are now as a resident.
You're a Savior and a gentleman.Well I'm not a surgery resident.
Med students certainly slow me down not speed me up. And by no means do any of my work but I'm still nice to them and teach them if there is downtime.
Yeah why on earth would you take call?? There's definitely nothing that ever happens at night that might be worth seeing, doing, or experiencing!!
Much less learning something about the job you're going to spend the next several years doing and having some concept of how to do it!!
Worthless!
Then that sounds like a system problem with your school or an individual problem with your interns (who are probably too busy learning to be interns to handle the additional teaching of medical students).Yes I learn a lot when you dont even talk to me, nor look at my soap notes which i spend time writing at 5am in the morning or when you ignore me or be sarcastic when i ask a question. Oh, and just by following you around, seeing you type up notes while I stand behind you, i learn a lot!
Then that sounds like a system problem with your school or an individual problem with your interns (who are probably too busy learning to be interns to handle the additional teaching of medical students).
In a well run program, taking call with the more senior residents overnight can lead to more autonomy, more opportunities to scrub in and to see things you wouldn't during the day. Patients always like to die in the middle of the night, the best traumas come in then, etc.
Well, to be fair... Not all calls are exciting. You think every page is OMG important? Nope. So, if anything, it let's you know how much residents enjoy call.hard to call it a system problem when it seems to happen more often than not.
I can understand surgery call for students for the reasons you said, but any other service makes really no sense and in my experience you rarely get called in and are just stuck sitting at hospital all night for no reason.
don't even get me started on pagers. still waiting for the mythical med student page
So, if anything, it let's you know how much residents enjoy call.
Not really justification but the truth. It'd be impossible to have an awesome experience for every student.That's not much of a justification though.