Dismiss Notice
Check out the new Application Assistant, where you can calculate your LizzyM score, see how you rank compared to other applicants, and see a list of schools where similar students were accepted.

Does not having research as "Most Meaningful" lower your chance at a top school?

Discussion in 'Pre-Medical Allopathic [ MD ]' started by riddler, 06.01.12.

  1. SDN is made possible through member donations, sponsorships, and our volunteers. Learn about SDN's nonprofit mission.
  1. riddler

    riddler 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    12.29.09
    Messages:
    179
    Status:
    Medical Student

    SDN Members don't see this ad. About the ads.
    Title says--asks--it all. What does everyone think? Is it necessary (or helpful) to mark research as a "Most Meaningful Activity" if you're aiming for a top 20 medical school?
     
  2. SDN Members don't see this ad. About the ads.
  3. Valadi

    Valadi 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    08.01.10
    Messages:
    769
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    I think whatever you pick should be congruent with your experiences. If you have little/no research then there it doesn't serve you. I don't remember this question on AMCAS, but if they're including it then I see a big opening for questions that ask you to describe why it's most meaningful on interviews.
     
  4. music2doc

    music2doc Student of Mad Doctoring 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    01.28.11
    Messages:
    2,956
    Status:
    Medical Student
    It was new this last cycle. That said, no, it shouldn't hurt you. I had plenty of research but didn't use it as a "most meaningful experience" IIRC. Nevertheless, it came up in my interviews at most schools (esp. those that were more research-intensive). I'd probably argue that if research is your most meaningful experience as a premed, you likely didn't have much of a pre-MEDICINE experience at all. :laugh:
     

About the ads

Share This Page