Menu Icon Search
Close Search

About the ads

Does not having research as "Most Meaningful" lower your chance at a top school?

Discussion in 'Pre-Medical Allopathic [ MD ]' started by riddler, 06.01.12.

  1. riddler

    riddler

    Joined:
    12.29.09
    Messages:
    179
    Status:
    Medical Student
    SDN 2+ Year Member

    SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
    Title says--asks--it all. What does everyone think? Is it necessary (or helpful) to mark research as a "Most Meaningful Activity" if you're aiming for a top 20 medical school?
  2. Valadi

    Valadi

    Joined:
    08.01.10
    Messages:
    772
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    SDN 2+ Year Member
    I think whatever you pick should be congruent with your experiences. If you have little/no research then there it doesn't serve you. I don't remember this question on AMCAS, but if they're including it then I see a big opening for questions that ask you to describe why it's most meaningful on interviews.
  3. music2doc

    music2doc Student of Mad Doctoring

    Joined:
    01.28.11
    Messages:
    2,959
    Status:
    Medical Student
    SDN 2+ Year Member
    It was new this last cycle. That said, no, it shouldn't hurt you. I had plenty of research but didn't use it as a "most meaningful experience" IIRC. Nevertheless, it came up in my interviews at most schools (esp. those that were more research-intensive). I'd probably argue that if research is your most meaningful experience as a premed, you likely didn't have much of a pre-MEDICINE experience at all. :laugh:

// Share //

Style: SDN Universal