Make sure you ask what the attrition rate is and when attrition occurs. VMRCVM failed out 7 students in the third year alone this year.
Last edited:
Attrition*
Make sure to also keep in mind that the average attrition rate for one class has no bearing on you as a student and that every vet school has resources to help you succeed no matter what you're struggling with. While 7 students may have failed third year this year, it's possible that 0 failed out last year, dropping the average to 3.5. If you the resources available to you through your school, you'll be pretty set.
Edit: http://aavmc.org/data/files/data/2015 aavmc public data.pdf
For 2014-2015, national attrition rate was 0.87%.
Why are making a sketchy thread about this, though? Every school fails students out. The class of 2018 at Illinois lost about 6 people the first year I've been told, Although 2 were allowed to come back the next year.Our attrition rate is much higher than that. But does that attrition rate include people that they let back, that would falsely lower the number. it's not a class problem its an attitude problem with the faculty. Obviously there should always be some attrition but we have enough debt and a high enough suicide rate without failing people because someone wrote a bad a test.
Our attrition rate is much higher than that. But does that attrition rate include people that they let back, that would falsely lower the number. it's not a class problem its an attitude problem with the faculty. Obviously there should always be some attrition but we have enough debt and a high enough suicide rate without failing people because someone wrote a bad a test.
Or perhaps students should be aware that you one bad test may be enough of an issue to stay on top of that subject. At least at UTK, they gave us every opportunity to retake years/semesters, etc if you did poorly. And we knew which classes were considered more challenging than others. While it's stressful to not do well and perhaps increase your time in vet school, every single vet school has classes like these. We lost 4 in our first year alone (out of 70) then lost 2 for health reasons after that.Our attrition rate is much higher than that. But does that attrition rate include people that they let back, that would falsely lower the number. it's not a class problem its an attitude problem with the faculty. Obviously there should always be some attrition but we have enough debt and a high enough suicide rate without failing people because someone wrote a bad a test.
VMRCVM failed out 7 students in the third year alone this year.
Our attrition rate is much higher than that. But does that attrition rate include people that they let back, that would falsely lower the number. it's not a class problem its an attitude problem with the faculty. Obviously there should always be some attrition but we have enough debt and a high enough suicide rate without failing people because someone wrote a bad a test.
What exactly is this "attitude of the faculty" you speak of? Given that you are a student, I assume your interactions with the faculty are minimal outside of lecture or making you take tests, so you can't really speak with any authority about how they feel about students despite how you may interpret their actions in your own biased light.
I'm sorry you feel the way you do, but when I was a student at VMCVM there was immense empathy for students, and there still is. I almost failed out in my third year due to personal issues affecting my grades, and I received nothing but support from the faculty and administration that allowed (and helped me) me to bounce back. Third year is very hard, no buts about it. But it sounds like to a separating the misery from the blame.
"Someone wrote a bad test" - you are showing your ignorance and bitterness here, and plainly at that.
Are you suggesting we lower the bar then? How much? How far? How long before we start graduating people that are actually incompetent?
There has to be a cutoff somewhere, like it or not. It's part of life. If you don't make the cutoffs at your job, you get fired.
There's no guarantee that by making it to 3rd year that you get to graduate.These aren't students failing out first or second year because they lack the aptitude. Some are d-ing out which is a legitimate reason to have to repeat as you have demonstrated a lack of mastery of the material. A random bad grade in a class in the sixth semester where 1SD from the mean is a D on both exams and the students weren't on academic concern is a pretty thin line to say that the student lacks the aptitude to be a veterinarian and should have to repeat.
90% of the faculty can be amazing and I have met some very compassionate individuals and skilled clinicians. And few would argue that we are not getting a good education. The student vs faculty feeling is unnecessary and has gotten worse since they are implementing the new curriculum next year. A lot of bitterness about having to change that spills over into the classroom. I've been at schools that were concerned with mentoring students, it creates a great environment.
And I didn't fail nor did any friends so I'm not arguing for myself. But I am bitter how they have treated honest students while those who know how to game the system get by (and in that regard I am in a position to have some knowledge).
Pretty sure my class has lost more than 15 people since first year. I think five at most weren't for academic reasons. Most of them are continuing with future class years. It sucks, but it happens; schools do make changes to try to reduce it, but they can't (shouldn't) just force people through...
There's no guarantee that by making it to 3rd year that you get to graduate.
we had our radiology course during 3rd year and it was a common cause of failing out. So I'm not sure I agree.I agree. But it should be an uncommon occurrence during the third year. These are bad culls. we should have low attrition during the third year and high attrition during the first year. I would rather see them fail people a little higher during 4th year as a different skill set is being evaluated.
I'm with the OP. We shouldn't even HAVE tests. It is so unfair to judge students. This school should be sued for discriminating between students who know the material and students who don't. You paid your tuition - that should be good enough to get a diploma.
Not a very helpful comment. I have no problem with students failing. Some people lack the aptitude. But they shouldn't fail for shoddy testing and the attrition rate should start high and taper to being low not the other way around. Debt is to big of an issue to be soft on people.
I agree. But it should be an uncommon occurrence during the third year. These are bad culls. we should have low attrition during the third year and high attrition during the first year. I would rather see them fail people a little higher during 4th year as a different skill set is being evaluated.
Why are making a sketchy thread about this, though? Every school fails students out. The class of 2018 at Illinois lost about 6 people the first year I've been told, Although 2 were allowed to come back the next year.
Edit: Actually, I looked up the 'failing out' requirements for VMRCVM. I'd say they aren't any more strict than another school. You guys actually have a more forgiving system than some I've seen. If one "poorly written" test did 7 people in, chances are they did poorly enough over the three years that this test did them in, unfortunately.
we had our radiology course during 3rd year and it was a common cause of failing out. So I'm not sure I agree.
These aren't students failing out first or second year because they lack the aptitude. Some are d-ing out which is a legitimate reason to have to repeat as you have demonstrated a lack of mastery of the material. A random bad grade in a class in the sixth semester where 1SD from the mean is a D on both exams and the students weren't on academic concern is a pretty thin line to say that the student lacks the aptitude to be a veterinarian and should have to repeat.
90% of the faculty can be amazing and I have met some very compassionate individuals and skilled clinicians. And few would argue that we are not getting a good education. The student vs faculty feeling is unnecessary and has gotten worse since they are implementing the new curriculum next year. A lot of bitterness about having to change that spills over into the classroom. I've been at schools that were concerned with mentoring students, it creates a great environment.
And I didn't fail nor did any friends so I'm not arguing for myself. But I am bitter how they have treated honest students while those who know how to game the system get by (and in that regard I am in a position to have some knowledge).
I don't think you should be "safe" from failing out any year. You need to keep your knowledge level high. We had previous 3rd years join our class for 3rd year. No one cared.And our radiology course was second year and a comparatively easy course compared to others we had on the docket. I don't have the perfect answer but I don't think we should have a high attrition rate in the third year (I'm not arguing for zero). I would rather see a remediation option during the third year that could be done during the breaks and more repeating or failing out in first two years.
I don't think you should be "safe" from failing out any year. You need to keep your knowledge level high. We had previous 3rd years join our class for 3rd year. No one cared.
Kind of off topic but, how is the difficulty level of questions on vet school exams compared to undergrad exams? I know the amount of material is FAR greater in vet school but are questions super complex or "you know it or you don't" questions? Is there a curve? Do professors look at questions and review how many students get a certain question wrong and throw it out?
Attrition*
not quite sure why students would have an issue with it, unless it is simply the fact that nobody likes change.
Not a very helpful comment. I have no problem with students failing. Some people lack the aptitude. But they shouldn't fail for shoddy testing and the attrition rate should start high and taper to being low not the other way around. Debt is to big of an issue to be soft on people.
Every class ever bitches.
Having to manage patients' lives is too big of an issue to be soft on students. You're dangerously close to arguing that because students have lots of debt they shouldn't be failed out.
Look. Students always gripe about tests. Unless you have some sort of substantive, specific, documentable gripe ... Then you're just grousing. Which is fine. But don't put poor student performance on the backs of your teachers.
Kind of off topic but, how is the difficulty level of questions on vet school exams compared to undergrad exams? I know the amount of material is FAR greater in vet school but are questions super complex or "you know it or you don't" questions? Is there a curve? Do professors look at questions and review how many students get a certain question wrong and throw it out?
We have had no curves. We do occasionally get a question thrown out or turned into a 'bonus question' if you have a legit reason as to why it wasn't a good question (poorly written or multiple answers with proof), but sometimes it also happens if a student bitches enough, which I don't like. Just on our last quiz, someone threw a fit about a simple multiplication/addition question because we weren't given scratch paper (we have a calculator in our exam software). The question ended up being a point for everyone.Kind of off topic but, how is the difficulty level of questions on vet school exams compared to undergrad exams? I know the amount of material is FAR greater in vet school but are questions super complex or "you know it or you don't" questions? Is there a curve? Do professors look at questions and review how many students get a certain question wrong and throw it out?
The class above us is also a whiny group. Supposedly it led to the early retirement of a teacher. I think my class is a mix of gunner and whiny. The sucky part is that sometimes it only takes a few people to give your class a bad label.True. Our class was actually called the "Apathetic Class" because for the most part we didn't bitch that much. The class before us what a whole 'nother matter though. They were the Whiny Class. Class below us was the Party Class, one below them was the Gunner Class.
Just on our last quiz, someone threw a fit about a simple multiplication/addition question because we weren't given scratch paper (we have a calculator in our exam software). The question ended up being a point for everyone.
.
We have had no curves. We do occasionally get a question thrown out or turned into a 'bonus question' if you have a legit reason as to why it wasn't a good question (poorly written or multiple answers with proof), but sometimes it also happens if a student bitches enough, which I don't like. Just on our last quiz, someone threw a fit about a simple multiplication/addition question because we weren't given scratch paper (we have a calculator in our exam software). The question ended up being a point for everyone.
The class above us is also a whiny group. Supposedly it led to the early retirement of a teacher. I think my class is a mix of gunner and whiny. The sucky part is that sometimes it only takes a few people to give your class a bad label.
People were complaining that they couldn't remember the total calories each for fat, protein, and carbs to come up with the total caloric amount (as fed) of the food described in the question. So they couldn't remember three numbers to add up for the final answer. I thought it was really petty and childish and I was a little disappointed to hear that the instructor caved like he did.What... I can't even... Does not compute. Calculator>> scratch paper, in my world.
People were complaining that they couldn't remember the total calories each for fat, protein, and carbs to come up with the total caloric amount (as fed) of the food described in the question. So they couldn't remember three numbers to add up for the final answer. I thought it was really petty and childish and I was a little disappointed to hear that the instructor caved like he did.
Agreed. Just yesterday, half of my class had a meltdown during renal phys because the prof added on another lecture to our quiz material at the last minute (the quiz was today, and he added the material yesterday). People were being extremely disrespectful, shouting at times. Someone plainly said they want to get him fired. This prof comes from the med school, and I was honestly embarrassed by my class. They made the whole class and school look bad. The prof took it well, even though I do think he can be a bit condescending at times. He also has major typos in his lecture which is something I can't stand, but you don't need to brag about how you're going to try and get him fired.That's awful. Yeah, that upper class at my school also contributed to one prof no longer teaching a class because they were so bitchy to him. And he was one of the nicest people I have ever known, very sweet (and sensitive, which is why I think he just didn't want to deal with it anymore). He did a very self-driven, PBL-type of class and people moaned and groaned that they weren't being spoon-fed enough.
That is definitely one of the things that gives me pause about going for prof. The abuse that they take sometimes, often unwarranted, from entitled students can be really awful.
Agreed. Just yesterday, half of my class had a meltdown during renal phys because the prof added on another lecture to our quiz material at the last minute (the quiz was today, and he added the material yesterday). People were being extremely disrespectful, shouting at times. Someone plainly said they want to get him fired. This prof comes from the med school, and I was honestly embarrassed by my class. They made the whole class and school look bad. The prof took it well, even though I do think he can be a bit condescending at times. He also has major typos in his lecture which is something I can't stand, but you don't need to brag about how you're going to try and get him fired.
Sometimes I feel like people forget their in a professional school and contribute to the general image and reputation of the school, especially in the local community. Some of the bar crawl/Friday night stories I hear the next week make me cringe. I'm all for having fun, but please don't be vomiting on yourself when you're on a bar crawl of clearly veterinary students. Our Vet Prom is a notorious event in the community, as we've been banned from several locations because people trash the place or get so drunk that they get sick everywhere. This past event was the first event in several years where the venue didn't tell us we weren't welcome back. Just really disappointing to the portion of students who manage to keep it together while still having fun.That's kind of crazy that people still pester their instructuctors like that in professional school. Granted, I'm not surprised because I see the kind of whiny stuff happen all the time at my undergrad. And when the profs let kids have their way... Yeah the habit doesn't get broken. And it continues In biochem one of my classmates would fuss with the teacher over every point. And take up class asking dumb questions so no one else could learn. "I just have to make sure ***I*** get the material! I can't get a B in this class and ruin my summa cum laude!" It got old sooooo fast. I see how vet school makes people bitter, if there's really classes full of people like that.
He also has major typos in his lecture which is something I can't stand...
Sometimes I feel like people forget their in a professional school and contribute to the general image and reputation of the school, especially in the local community.
One thing nobody really mentioned to the OP is that writing good exam questions is actually pretty damn hard. At least, that's been my experience. I've had to write a few tests over the years, and it is amazing how hard it can be to write a large number of good questions with bulletproof answers. People getting all pissy over one or two questions on an exam? Ugh. I'd just start telling people "Fine. No written exams. We'll do oral exams. Schedule will be posted next week. Expect to be able to explain in detail any concept that falls under the syllabus whether it was covered in lecture or not. See ya wouldn't want to be ya."
Or I'd just make it all essay. And then hand out random grades based on my impression of the student without bothering to read the exams. Bob asked great questions and seems to 'get it' - A on his exam. Biff asked pointless questions and clearly doesn't get it - D. Gina is a brat who slept through every class, but I hear she does ok on clinics - C.
There's a big difference between the number of people who "fail out" and the number that leave for all reasons, including non-academic ones. The fact that one class in one school lost a bunch of people doesn't mean that they failed their academics.....it could have been a fluke of consequences that had a bunch of people leaving for personal reasons unrelated to one another. Those numbers should be of no consequence to potential students, because personal reasons are, well, personal and don't impact other (or future) students. Repeated attrition numbers, or an average attrition rate should be all that matters, and even that should be taken with a grain of salt (since we can't tell from the numbers WHY someone left school). I think we lost 4 or 5 people in our class over 4 years, but only one of them was for academic reasons. On the other hand, we gained 3 people from previous classes that had dropped out a year earlier and joined us instead (only one was for academic failure; the others were for different personal reasons)Thanks for the info! I think the national attrition rate shows people that don't come back so I wanted to get a feel for what its like at other institutions.
Do you know that there wasn't a remediation option or that they weren't offered opportunities to re-do a module/course/exam etc. Were they not offered an opportunity to remedy the problem area, or did they just not want to? My class had over a dozen people fail a course, and they were all offered a summer to re-do it; they didn't want to give up the summer income, but they were glad for the opportunity to right their wrongs.And our radiology course was second year and a comparatively easy course compared to others we had on the docket. I don't have the perfect answer but I don't think we should have a high attrition rate in the third year (I'm not arguing for zero). I would rather see a remediation option during the third year that could be done during the breaks and more repeating or failing out in first two years.