- Joined
- Jun 19, 2012
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 6
Fwiw, I do indeed apologize guys. My post was crudely composed and arrogant. FFP my apologies especially. You are a contributor to this forum whose posts I respect.
48k apps for 20k slots?Despite record numbers of students applying to medical schools in 2012-2013 and enrolling this year, the United States still faces an impending physician shortage if Congress does not raise caps on residency funding, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) announced today.
Medical schools have done their part to expand enrollment, AAMC President and Chief Executive Officer Darrell Kirch, MD, said in a teleconference yesterday, and new medical schools have opened, making room for more students. Likewise, 48,014 students applied to medical school last year, with the number of first-time enrollees in US medical schools at an all-time high of 20,055.
"So the students have stepped up and done their part. The medical schools have responded quickly and with clarity, and now Congress needs to do its part and lift this 16-year-old ban on the number of training positions," Dr. Kirch said.
In 1997, as part of the Balanced Budget Act, the government limited Medicare funding of graduate medical education at 1996 levels for most teaching hospitals.
Today, teaching hospitals still face restrictions on their ability to develop or expand new programs, according to written workforce policy recommendations from the AAMC.
There are "roughly" 28,500 first-year residency positions, and graduates from US medical schools must compete for them with graduates from US osteopathic schools and foreign medical schools, many of whom are US citizens, as well as physicians from other countries.
"f things continue with the rate they are, at some point in the next 2 years it's likely that MDs will surpass the number of available [residency] slots," he said.
The most competitive specialties were Neurological Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, Plastic Surgery, and Radiation-Oncology,I concur. Five-10 applicants/slot... that would be competitive.
Have you ever driven an R8? You may change your mind. FYI, I know quite a few Neurosurgeons who work LESS than Anesthesiologists per week while earning double the pay.Back when I applied, there were 100 Ivy League med students auditioning in American idol type interviews just to get on the waiting list! And I walked to work up hill both ways through the ghetto!
Who cares what's competitive. Do what makes you happy. As FFP mentioned... Happiness is way underrated. I'd rather smile on my way to work driving my KIA than think of ways to even find any time to kill myself driving my neurosurgeon funded Audi R8. Q3 call is ok in your 20s but becomes not cool after a while.
I know. My buddy anesthesia from Texas has hit some hard times recently.Have you ever driven an R8? You may change your mind. FYI, I know quite a few Neurosurgeons who work LESS than Anesthesiologists per week while earning double the pay.
Have you ever driven an R8? You may change your mind. FYI, I know quite a few Neurosurgeons who work LESS than Anesthesiologists per week while earning double the pay.
I understand (and agree with) your general point. Med students should do some serious research into other specialties if they ever hope to see the inside of an R8. Anesthesia likely will not get them there. There are definitely more promising specialties out there financially speaking. The real question is which specialties? In our current system, CMS can destroy a specialty with the stoke of a pen. All of a sudden colonoscopies could reimburse $30 and suddenly there is no more GI competition. Looking into my crystal ball, I foresee a two tiered system. You will have your free obamacare/hilarycare/billmaher-care and then you will have cash. IMO, the specialties who are set up to succeed are the ones that patients are willing to pay cash for. Derm, Plastics, Pain, etc.Have you ever driven an R8? You may change your mind. FYI, I know quite a few Neurosurgeons who work LESS than Anesthesiologists per week while earning double the pay.
I understand (and agree with) your general point. Med students should do some serious research into other specialties if they ever hope to see the inside of an R8. Anesthesia likely will not get them there. There are definitely more promising specialties out there financially speaking. The real question is which specialties? In our current system, CMS can destroy a specialty with the stoke of a pen. All of a sudden colonoscopies could reimburse $30 and suddenly there is no more GI competition. Looking into my crystal ball, I foresee a two tiered system. You will have your free obamacare/hilarycare/billmaher-care and then you will have cash. IMO, the specialties who are set up to succeed are the ones that patients are willing to pay cash for. Derm, Plastics, Pain, etc.
And no, I have not been in an R8 and I don't want to. I'm good with my Honda and boglehead philosophies!
"The things you own end up owning you." -Tyler Durden
Despite record numbers of students applying to medical schools in 2012-2013 and enrolling this year, the United States still faces an impending physician shortage if Congress does not raise caps on residency funding, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) announced today.
Medical schools have done their part to expand enrollment, AAMC President and Chief Executive Officer Darrell Kirch, MD, said in a teleconference yesterday, and new medical schools have opened, making room for more students. Likewise, 48,014 students applied to medical school last year, with the number of first-time enrollees in US medical schools at an all-time high of 20,055.
"So the students have stepped up and done their part. The medical schools have responded quickly and with clarity, and now Congress needs to do its part and lift this 16-year-old ban on the number of training positions," Dr. Kirch said.
In 1997, as part of the Balanced Budget Act, the government limited Medicare funding of graduate medical education at 1996 levels for most teaching hospitals.
Today, teaching hospitals still face restrictions on their ability to develop or expand new programs, according to written workforce policy recommendations from the AAMC.
There are "roughly" 28,500 first-year residency positions, and graduates from US medical schools must compete for them with graduates from US osteopathic schools and foreign medical schools, many of whom are US citizens, as well as physicians from other countries.
"f things continue with the rate they are, at some point in the next 2 years it's likely that MDs will surpass the number of available [residency] slots," he said.
CMS doesn't need to "destroy" any particular specialty. Instead, they announce UNIVERSAL MEDICARE COVERAGE for all on the exchanges. Thus, you either sign up for Medicaid (free), heavily discounted/subsidized Medicare or PRICEY private insurance on the exchange. Employers will begin to dump all employees into the exchanges for MEDICARE. Only the top 1-2% can afford to keep the private insurance.I understand (and agree with) your general point. Med students should do some serious research into other specialties if they ever hope to see the inside of an R8. Anesthesia likely will not get them there. There are definitely more promising specialties out there financially speaking. The real question is which specialties? In our current system, CMS can destroy a specialty with the stoke of a pen. All of a sudden colonoscopies could reimburse $30 and suddenly there is no more GI competition. Looking into my crystal ball, I foresee a two tiered system. You will have your free obamacare/hilarycare/billmaher-care and then you will have cash. IMO, the specialties who are set up to succeed are the ones that patients are willing to pay cash for. Derm, Plastics, Pain, etc.
And no, I have not been in an R8 and I don't want to. I'm good with my Honda and boglehead philosophies!
"The things you own end up owning you." -Tyler Durden
It is my understanding that a lot of spine pays so well because each level is a different procedure and may be billed as such. (If this is wrong, please correct me and fill me in with the right info.) But assuming that is true, if payors start deciding that is crap, wouldn't you expect a nosedive in those salaries*.
*I seem to remember you mentioning you had some buddies that do spine that have a great life, including pay, call schedule, owning the ASC, etc.
In my own opinion, it is at the very least distasteful, and more accurately slimy as hell to go into medicine to buy into a business and/or be a millionaire. These businesses usually have absolutely embarrassing conflicts of interest, and the millionaire attitudes are a minority, but unfortunately very visible to the lay public.
Everyone's obviously entitled to their opinion. Mine is that if your goal on life is to live like a rich king, you're shallow and don't understand what life is really about. If you go into a profession to improve other people's lives and still aren't happy unless you're a millionaire, you're not a psychosocially healthy person.
Yes I'm judgemental but god I'm sick of hearing the bitching about not making 800k.
In my own opinion, it is at the very least distasteful, and more accurately slimy as hell to go into medicine to buy into a business and/or be a millionaire. These businesses usually have absolutely embarrassing conflicts of interest, and the millionaire attitudes are a minority, but unfortunately very visible to the lay public.
Everyone's obviously entitled to their opinion. Mine is that if your goal on life is to live like a rich king, you're shallow and don't understand what life is really about. If you go into a profession to improve other people's lives and still aren't happy unless you're a millionaire, you're not a psychosocially healthy person.
Yes I'm judgemental but god I'm sick of hearing the bitching about not making 800k.
I'm not saying it's right to settle for middle class. But honestly what other choice do we have? Our professional societies care more about making $$ off of us (ie MOC) than they do about protecting/helping us. As we have no serious money to spend in Washington, we don't even have a fighting chance at any legislative victories. Getting upset/depressed about it doesn't help me any. I've trained myself to accept and enjoy middle class lifestyle while hoping/fighting for more.
Regarding the "safest" specialties, this is where I just don't think GI, Neurosurg, etc are safe. You can't base it on current CMS reimbursement because they continue to cut that year after year. For example cardiology and pain. They cut epidural steroid injections by 60% and obliterated spinal cord stim reimbursement this year. Just because they can. Who is to say that next year they don't go after ortho or neuro surg? There is no money in the system and physicians are easy targets. They will nail one of these "safe" specialties in the near future because the "safe" specialties are where the money currently is. I'm actually one of very few who is bullish on FP. They have a very good thing going with the cash based membership programs and a quality physician will do well with that. Not only that but they can actually get to be a physician without government and insurance company interference.
My main point was to pick the specialty you enjoy and hope that the rest pans out. Picking a specialty based on future income is like trying to time the market. You might get lucky but you may not and then end up hating life.
Is there currently a rush to Pain Management? Or a foreseeable one? Just from clerkships I have noticed many people having to pay cash (and willing to do so) to go to their pain doc.
I didn't say to FP levels. I just said that they aren't safe. Would being a neurosurgeon with tons of call be worth 300k per yr after a decade of residency? Hell no. But if CMS/insurance sets the bar there then what can they do? The best options IMO are to find ways to avoid CMS/insurance completely in the future. Obviously that is not possible with a lot of specialties, including anesthesia.If you think CMS will cut Neurosurgery and Ortho to FP levels you are sadly mistaken. There are specialties which will weather the CMS storm much better than others.
Anesthesia is not one of them. Of course, you shouldn't choose a specialty based solely on income but the fact remains Anesthesia is already DEVALUED by CMS and no further cuts are necessary or even sustainable.
THAT is exactly where I was going. For strictly financial reasons, I think that those who are able to opt out will be in the best position. That doesn't mean it's viable now, but in the future that may be where it goes.Pain Management is an excellent career choice if you like the field. As a Physician you have the right to control the amount of CMS which you see in your office. This means you can work a bit less and see fewer CMS patients unwilling to pay cash (you opt out of medicare).
It's not there yet but with CMS cuts it could get there.Is there currently a rush to Pain Management? Or a foreseeable one? Just from clerkships I have noticed many people having to pay cash (and willing to do so) to go to their pain doc.
My med school was $120k. With living expenses and interest, my loan total was about $300k. I'd venture to guess that with 300k in tuition alone that the total would be half a million by the time someone would get the bill.
I think most derm patients could see a family practice doc and would do so if they had to pay cash.
The only viable cash specialties I can imagine working out are plastics, rich people psych, and MFM.
In my own opinion, it is at the very least distasteful, and more accurately slimy as hell to go into medicine to buy into a business and/or be a millionaire. These businesses usually have absolutely embarrassing conflicts of interest, and the millionaire attitudes are a minority, but unfortunately very visible to the lay public.
Everyone's obviously entitled to their opinion. Mine is that if your goal on life is to live like a rich king, you're shallow and don't understand what life is really about. If you go into a profession to improve other people's lives and still aren't happy unless you're a millionaire, you're not a psychosocially healthy person.
Yes I'm judgemental but god I'm sick of hearing the bitching about not making 800k.
My med school was $120k. With living expenses and interest, my loan total was about $300k. I'd venture to guess that with 300k in tuition alone that the total would be half a million by the time someone would get the bill.
You keep saying that about neurosurgery, ortho, etc, but you never support your position. There's no reason these surgical sub-specialties are going to be untouched going forward. Keep in mind general surgeons were king just a few decades ago. Now, they get shat on by the likes of ENT, uro, plastics, etc. NO ONE is safe - no one. They may not make FM money, but they don't work 9-5 either. Even pain medicine or other pay-out-of-pocket fields will feel the pain, because there aren't enough people out there able to pay handsomely out of pocket for everyone to get theirs. There may be a select few who have made a name for themselves in a wealthy community that will fare well, but everyone else will be scrapping for the leftovers.If you think CMS will cut Neurosurgery and Ortho to FP levels you are sadly mistaken. There are specialties which will weather the CMS storm much better than others.
Anesthesia is not one of them. Of course, you shouldn't choose a specialty based solely on income but the fact remains Anesthesia is already DEVALUED by CMS and no further cuts are necessary or even sustainable.
You keep saying that about neurosurgery, ortho, etc, but you never support your position. There's no reason these surgical sub-specialties are going to be untouched going forward. Keep in mind general surgeons were king just a few decades ago. Now, they get shat on by the likes of ENT, uro, plastics, etc. NO ONE is safe - no one. They may not make FM money, but they don't work 9-5 either. Even pain medicine or other pay-out-of-pocket fields will feel the pain, because there aren't enough people out there able to pay handsomely out of pocket for everyone to get theirs. There may be a select few who have made a name for themselves in a wealthy community that will fare well, but everyone else will be scrapping for the leftovers.
This isn't about anesthesia vs [blank]. It's about payment models and rates.Have you looked at the supply of surgical sub-specialties vs anesthesia? Yeah...
This isn't about anesthesia vs [blank]. It's about payment models and rates.
You keep saying that about neurosurgery, ortho, etc, but you never support your position. There's no reason these surgical sub-specialties are going to be untouched going forward. Keep in mind general surgeons were king just a few decades ago. Now, they get shat on by the likes of ENT, uro, plastics, etc. NO ONE is safe - no one. They may not make FM money, but they don't work 9-5 either. Even pain medicine or other pay-out-of-pocket fields will feel the pain, because there aren't enough people out there able to pay handsomely out of pocket for everyone to get theirs. There may be a select few who have made a name for themselves in a wealthy community that will fare well, but everyone else will be scrapping for the leftovers.
Aren't some of these inflated numbers due to the requirement that all residency slots had to be filled through the NRMP Match rather then filling positions after the match? Would that make it seem as though positions are increasing every year even though they really are not?"Other fields that are highly sought after have kept the number of residency positions level or even decreased despite the clamoring for spots. Dermatology went from 31 in 2010 to just 20 this year, making it even more desirable like a rare commodity. Neurosurgery went from 191 five years ago to 206 today, a barely perceptible increase of 7.9%. Orthopedics stayed fairly stable from 656 to 695, or 5.9%. What did anesthesiology department heads do? They increased the number of positions available by 31.6% in five years. That rate of growth is clearly not sustainable and will take time to absorb." - http://www.blog.greatzs.com/
These new graduates will drive starting salaries down even further. AMCs will exploit the newly inflated numbers by offering lower salaries. Fellowship positions will become sought after in even greater numbers.
The biggest threat facing Anesthesiology in the near future is our own organization. Leadership needs to curtail residency slots by 50% and transfer these ACGME positions to Family practice or Internal Medicine. Instead, open AA programs and staff the O.R.s using the same 4:1 model (or 3:1 for academics) like AMCS use in the real world.
If our leadership cut positions by 50% I would highly recommend this field to med students.
The numbers are increasing from 2010. This year the total is very similar to 2013. There has been a huge increase though over the past 4 years.Aren't some of these inflated numbers due to the requirement that all residency slots had to be filled through the NRMP Match rather then filling positions after the match? Would that make it seem as though positions are increasing every year even though they really are not?
The numbers are increasing from 2009. This year the total is very similar to 2013. There has been a huge increase though over the past 5 years.
2014 1662 positions
2013- 1653 positions
2012- 1476
2011-1404
2010-1355
______
2009 1394
2008 1364
2007 1338
2006 1311
2005 1283
2005-2009 data may not include another group of Residents who switched into anesthesiology. However, that number has usually been around 50-80 per year.
http://www.nrmp.org/2014-nrmp-main-residency-match-results/