The Politico article apparently is an excerpt from Howard Schultz' (Starbucks' CEO) book that some other guy wrote for him about veterans or something.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/12/general-chiarellis-brain-crusade-113827.html
The writing style of this piece reminds me a bit of the superhuman, hero-worship style that Greg Mortensen's ghostwriter used to write Three Cups of Tea, and we all know how that turned out.
I found this excerpt very interesting because it seems like a fairly instructive example of the chasm between the military medical community and the line. The general is impressed by pictures and graphs that may or may not actually mean something and simplistic comparisons to fixing a truck. He unilaterally decides that PTSD is not a "disorder." He views physicians and researchers as cloistered eggheads. It's ironic, because everyone's end goal - making injured troops better - is undoubtedly shared.
I'm mostly curious how the experienced folks on this site view his account of getting totally rebuffed by everyone at Walter Reed. Seems unbelievable to me. At the very least, the doctors' side is not reported.
The Atlantic also has a long, thought provoking piece if you've got a long flight coming up...
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/12/the-tragedy-of-the-american-military/383516/
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/12/general-chiarellis-brain-crusade-113827.html
The writing style of this piece reminds me a bit of the superhuman, hero-worship style that Greg Mortensen's ghostwriter used to write Three Cups of Tea, and we all know how that turned out.
I found this excerpt very interesting because it seems like a fairly instructive example of the chasm between the military medical community and the line. The general is impressed by pictures and graphs that may or may not actually mean something and simplistic comparisons to fixing a truck. He unilaterally decides that PTSD is not a "disorder." He views physicians and researchers as cloistered eggheads. It's ironic, because everyone's end goal - making injured troops better - is undoubtedly shared.
I'm mostly curious how the experienced folks on this site view his account of getting totally rebuffed by everyone at Walter Reed. Seems unbelievable to me. At the very least, the doctors' side is not reported.
The Atlantic also has a long, thought provoking piece if you've got a long flight coming up...
http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/12/the-tragedy-of-the-american-military/383516/
Last edited:
