Good News, that POS Comrade Obama ruined the Democratic Party

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Ligament

Interventional Pain Management
Lifetime Donor
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2002
Messages
6,517
Reaction score
3,071
Republican House, Senate, and huge Republican increase in Governors. Thank God. Lets see if they can kill Obamanocare for us.

I'd rather they all be Libertarians...maybe after Ben Carson gets elected President.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hellz yea boyieee. :horns::banana::soexcited:
 
Republican House, Senate, and huge Republican increase in Governors. Thank God. Lets see if they can kill Obamanocare for us.

I'd rather they all be Libertarians...maybe after Ben Carson gets elected President.
The biggest benefit is to get rid of Harry Reid. Now at least people will see what's going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
The biggest benefit is to get rid of Harry Reid. Now at least people will see what's going on.

for a liberal like myself, that actually is a silver lining to this scenario...... he's a d-bag
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Republican House, Senate, and huge Republican increase in Governors. Thank God. Lets see if they can kill Obamanocare for us.

I'd rather they all be Libertarians...maybe after Ben Carson gets elected President.

Your F'''in crazy if you think this is going to change anything in Washington.
By the way Carson is a tool, don't care if he is a physician or not.
 
Your F'''in crazy if you think this is going to change anything in Washington.
By the way Carson is a tool, don't care if he is a physician or not.

I am F'''in crazy I admit. The Republicans are almost as bad as the Socialists nee Democrats. They are all corrupt. But at least Obama has stronger opposition now, hopefully they can roadblock any further anti American agenda he has, especially his planned amnesty for the illegal invaders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Your F'''in crazy if you think this is going to change anything in Washington.
By the way Carson is a tool, don't care if he is a physician or not.

Is Carson a tool? I'd like to hear your thoughts. So far I think everything he's said is responsible and pro-American, logical. Am I missing something? (I'm not being sarcastic).
 
Carson is a religious nut. Its the problem with 90% of the GOP(at least in CO)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The results probably reflect more the utter incompetence of this administration than the liberal agenda. If Obama had a glassy smooth rollout of the Obamacare website, for example, you'd see a different result. He really did a number on the cause of activist government. I'm happy about that but I don't think Americans have changed their minds about liberalism in general.

I wish Republicans would stick to basic libertarianism, limited federal government and recognize that religion has no place in law.
 
I love it!! Republican House, Senate, and an increase in Governors. They'll certainly be more pro-physician than the loons who've been destroying, er I mean running this country the last 6 years. Yes! :soexcited::clap::highfive:a
 
Members don't see this ad :)
We need to get religion out of politics completely.

A politician will do exactly what the public expects him to, just to get elected. A government is the reflection of the people who voted.
 
If 2016 is Rand vs. Hillary.....which one do ya'll think will win?
 
If 2016 is Rand vs. Hillary.....which one do ya'll think will win?

Rand if he can keep religion and reproduction out of the equation. Billary is ruined as best I can tell from the Benghazi coverup and being associated with Comrade Obama. Also there should be no dynastic presidential families (Bush clan included).
 
Rand if he can keep religion and reproduction out of the equation. Billary is ruined as best I can tell from the Benghazi coverup and being associated with Comrade Obama. Also there should be no dynastic presidential families (Bush clan included).
No liberals care about Benghazi, and most independents believe it was just a politicized media circus. 79% or Republicans thought Benghazi was a big deal, but the majority of voters don't care enough to make it an issue in 2016. I certainly don't care as an independent. I'd be tempted to vote democrat just to prevent having an all-Republican House, Senate, and Presidency, as one party controlling all of government is never a good thing and exactly how Obamacare and the war in Iraq happened.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/05/voters-trust-clinton-over-gop-on-benghazi.html
 
I'd be tempted to vote democrat just to prevent having an all-Republican House, Senate, and Presidency, as one party controlling all of government is never a good thing and exactly how Obamacare and the war in Iraq happened.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/05/voters-trust-clinton-over-gop-on-benghazi.html

Benghazi will hurt, but not a deal breaker for most voters. She will automatically get the vote of 90% of the women in this country, even the republicans, just like obama got 99% of the black vote. Have a female president is huge to modern women, they will stick their fingers in their ears on the issues, and just vote for her.

No political party really favors physicians, but no political party is more clearly against physician interests than the democrats.

I've been an independent most of my life, but after what the last two democratic administrations have done to physicians, I will vote republican on every national race until I retire. No one has done more to undermine the authority and destroy the livelihood of physicians, than the democrats.
 
Benghazi will hurt, but not a deal breaker for most voters. She will automatically get the vote of 90% of the women in this country, even the republicans, just like obama got 99% of the black vote. Have a female president is huge to modern women, they will stick their fingers in their ears on the issues, and just vote for her.

No political party really favors physicians, but no political party is more clearly against physician interests than the democrats.

I've been an independent most of my life, but after what the last two democratic administrations have done to physicians, I will vote republican on every national race until I retire. No one has done more to undermine the authority and destroy the livelihood of physicians, than the democrats.
I prefer gridlock myself. Both parties are insane, so government works best when neither of them is getting anything done.

Personally, I could never see voting only based upon my career though. I mean, there's a lot of other issues out there, from war to internet freedom to energy policy to international trade policy. What good is me having a nice career if everything else in this country is ****?
 
If I was a democrat I'd be livid. Obama decimated the party back to 1928 numbers of republican house dominance. He's really allowed the wheels to fall off that party. It's an amazing self immolation, considering in 2008-2010 they had all three of the Senate, House and White House. This guy's unreal. He just handed the Republican Party the whole fricken country. Look at the map of red vs blue after Tuesday. It's an unreal collapse he handed his own party. Just unreal:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/here-s-what-a-republican-takeover-looks-likes-20141105

The most amazing thing about it, is how defiant he was in the face of it all at his post election press conference. The Dems should be worried, because if he keeps up his defiant stance, they could bleed even more seats in 2016. By then he'll be gone and won't care, but their career trajectories will potentially be trashed.
 
Last edited:
Benghazi will hurt, but not a deal breaker for most voters. She will automatically get the vote of 90% of the women in this country, even the republicans, just like obama got 99% of the black vote. Have a female president is huge to modern women, they will stick their fingers in their ears on the issues, and just vote for her.

No political party really favors physicians, but no political party is more clearly against physician interests than the democrats.

I've been an independent most of my life, but after what the last two democratic administrations have done to physicians, I will vote republican on every national race until I retire. No one has done more to undermine the authority and destroy the livelihood of physicians, than the democrats.

Wait, are you saying 90% of women voters are sexist and 99% of black voters are racist? You mean they don't vote based on political issues but rather on sex and skin color?
 
If I was a democrat I'd be livid. Obama decimated the party back to 1928 numbers of republican house dominance. He's really allowed the wheels to fall off that party. It's an amazing self immolation, considering in 2008-2010 they had all three of the Senate, House and White House. This guy's unreal. He just handed the Republican Party the whole fricken country. Look at the map of red vs blue after Tuesday. It's an unreal collapse he handed his own party. Just unreal:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/here-s-what-a-republican-takeover-looks-likes-20141105

The most amazing thing about it, is how defiant he was in the face of it all at his post election press conference. The Dems should be worried, because if he keeps up his defiant stance, they could bleed even more seats in 2016. By then he'll be gone and won't care, but their career trajectories will potentially be trashed.

Its really wonderful. About the only good news to come from state or federal government for many years.
 
No one has done more to undermine the authority and destroy the livelihood of physicians, than the democrats.

Well, physicians who vote for and support socialists like Comrade Obama have done more to undermine the authority of and destroy the livelihood of physicians than the democrats. They apparently enjoy career suicide, and want to ruin your career as well. The next worst group are democrats as a whole.
 
Wait, are you saying 90% of women voters are sexist and 99% of black voters are racist? You mean they don't vote based on political issues but rather on sex and skin color?

No but many women are reverse sexists and many blacks are reverse racists. Somehow it's fine for them to vote and hire women/blacks preferentially, but a white guy would get reamed for that behavior.

When it comes to the big prize of the White House, women will forget all reason and political issues and just vote for their own sex. Much as I hate to admit it, Obama will hand the keys of the White House to Hillary in 2 years.
 
No but many women are reverse sexists and many blacks are reverse racists. Somehow it's fine for them to vote and hire women/blacks preferentially, but a white guy would get reamed for that behavior.

When it comes to the big prize of the White House, women will forget all reason and political issues and just vote for their own sex. Much as I hate to admit it, Obama will hand the keys of the White House to Hillary in 2 years.

Unless Ben Carson runs...and I hope he does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I don't know how Carson would deal with hecklers. He's used to being respected, unlike these other idiot politicians. But that would be incredible to get a conservative/libertarian PHYSICIAN in the white house. Not just for our profession, but for our country. Someone who's actually done something constructive. But I suspect that one word of religion from his mouth and the liberal media will pour gasoline on him and set him off in a blaze of glory.
 
Ben Carson:

"Carson’s views on evolution and creationism have also generated controversy.[45] In a 2006 debate with Richard Dawkins, Francis Collins, and Daniel Dennett, Carson stated: “I don’t believe in evolution .... I simply don’t have enough faith to believe that something as complex as our ability to rationalize, think, and plan, and have a moral sense of what’s right and wrong, just appeared.”[46] In 2012 nearly 500 professors, students, and alumni of Emory University wrote a letter expressing concern about Carson’s views in advance of his commencement speech, although no request was made to rescind Carson’s invitation. In particular, they cited his quote in an Adventist Review interview where he said, “By believing we are the product of random acts, we eliminate morality and the basis of ethical behavior.” Carson responded by clarifying his views, saying, “People who believe in survival of the fittest might have more difficulty deriving where their ethics come from. A lot of evolutionists are very ethical people.”[45]"


go pound sand, DOCTOR carson........


republicans would never vote for a anfrican american in the primaries. he would be an ideal VP choice for the party that hates science, however.....
 
Ok I now have some hope that Hillary won't get the White House.

2 concerns. I don't see this announcement on any major news sites like CNN or nytimes

The guy is brilliant and very capable. But doesn't he have minimal political experience?

didn't stop Obama
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
..republicans would never vote for a anfrican american in the primaries. he would be an ideal VP choice for the party that hates science, however.....
You will eat these words. The Republican party would LOVE to nominate a black person. It's like when I heard Chris Matthews say that because Herman Cain had an affair with a BLONDE woman, Republicans couldn't deal with black and blonde. WTH??? These are liberal delusions of an evil empire-type party that does not exist anywhere. There are obviously nutcases and racist bigots in both parties. But these kinds of views are not the views of the party. And I'm not Republican by the way. If Carson doesn't get nominated, it's because people are afraid he would be demonized and lose the general election. This is IN SPITE of his race, which is a MAJOR plus for him, just like it was for Obama, both in the primary and the general elections.

Personally, I don't share his views on religion, but they're only threatening to a minimal degree at this point. If he wants to impose his views on others and base laws on them that interfere with individual rights, then I have a problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

He has NOT announced his candidacy, but rather hinted at it.

Billary has no chance if he runs. Billary would only get some of the socialist and a lot of the female vote (sadly; I'd like to think they'd vote based on policies vs. sex and I hope to be proven wrong, will be interesting to see % of women that vote for Billary).

He will get 100% of the racist voters that voted for Obama based on skin color vs. content of character, which is a huge percent of the Democratic party. They will be duped into voting for a libertarian. It will be oh so sweet to see that happen. Idiots. "Wait...what? You mean I just voted for a Republican...DOH!"

The Democratic race card spin machine will loose its legs and be exposed for the lie that it is. The only thing they could spin against him is that he is christian, male, heterosexual. They can't really spin his lack of political experience either, as Comrade Obama had only 2 years of experience in the Senate and he is a lowlife politician, not a freaking pediatric neurosurgeon who has contributed something of value to this world.

He will get the libertarian and republican vote.

He will get the thinking voters vote.

He's the ideal candidate. I'd trust a physician as president over some lowlife career politician any day.

If he ran with Rand Paul it would be so sweet! Paul is also a physician, don't forget (Ophthalmologist).

His weakness:

1. Keep religion out of his candidacy. Religion belongs out of politics. All politicians should keep their traps shut about this issue.
2. He better keep his pro-life stance out of the candidacy as well. A president should have nothing to do with pregnant women. The Presidents job is to deal with foreign relations and defense, not the womb.
3. That he does not believe in evolution is slightly worrisome, but I don't care as whether any candidate believes in evolution vs. creationism has zero bearing on their qualifications as President. I don't see how such a believe could affect any Presidential decision making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Got to scrub in with Ben Carson years ago on a combined Peds Neurosurgery/Plastics case. Was standing literally elbow to elbow with him for hours. One of the nicest, unpretentious, unassuming surgeons I've ever had the pleasure of knowing. Couldn't care less about his religious views. He's got my vote if he runs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
I would love to see Carson run but I still think he will suffer tremendously in debates and with hecklers. Chiefs of Pediatric Neurosurgery are not well-adapted to the ignorant food fights of politics. This guy has had years and years of deference and being at the top of the food chain. He has not been confronted by an angry, ignorant mob, ever. Christie, on the other hand, is completely ready for such nonsense and is supremely adapted to deal with it. As pathetic as it is, this is a necessary skill to win in politics. But if Carson can demonstrate his ability to deal with fire under pressure, that would be very interesting indeed.
 
You will eat these words. The Republican party would LOVE to nominate a black person. It's like when I heard Chris Matthews say that because Herman Cain had an affair with a BLONDE woman, Republicans couldn't deal with black and blonde. WTH??? These are liberal delusions of an evil empire-type party that does not exist anywhere. There are obviously nutcases and racist bigots in both parties. But these kinds of views are not the views of the party. And I'm not Republican by the way. If Carson doesn't get nominated, it's because people are afraid he would be demonized and lose the general election. This is IN SPITE of his race, which is a MAJOR plus for him, just like it was for Obama, both in the primary and the general elections.

Personally, I don't share his views on religion, but they're only threatening to a minimal degree at this point. If he wants to impose his views on others and base laws on them that interfere with individual rights, then I have a problem.

you are dead wrong.

the good ol boys in the south will NOT vote for this guy. the north/east/west coast wont vote for him b/c he's a republican. you completely underestimate the amount of racism is this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The guy is brilliant and very capable. But doesn't he have minimal political experience?

it is impossible to be brilliant and also disavow the concept of evolution. gimme a break.
 
first, have to agree with ssdoc about republicans electing a non-white. it is getting better, mind you.

1. in an election where Democrats lost big time... 90% of blacks still voted Democrat.

2.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch...ess-black-republicans-took-home-historic-wins

this election - first black senator from the South since the Reconstruction. first black Republican from Texas - ever.

without the South, Republicans wont win the presidency.
(in case you forgot, the Reconstruction was 1865-1877.)

3. with that healthcare plan, Pain Medicine as a field will disappear.
 
Remove the religion and social BS and you'd have to change the name of the Republican party to libertarian.
Better for the Libertarians to take over the current apparatus. The Republican Party is in the process of being rebranded. You don't see the leadership like Boehner and McConnell babbling about religion. The Religious Right are learning about Darwinian selection even as they question it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Can we please elect a libertarian president with libertarian supermajorities in congress? C-Span would actually get ratings...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Anyone who went to Yale AND became a pediatric neurosurgeon is likely to be smarter than you or me.

bullsh@t. i would kill him in a game of trivial pursuit or jeopardy.

and since when does getting into yale make you brilliant? dont get me started on that.

im sure that we'd all agree that EVERY neurosurgeon we meet are absolutely brilliant. one guy i work with that still cant figure out how to name a radiculopathy.

also, dare i say, that minorities need much less competitive requirements to be accepted to better undergrad and medical schools.

all that aside, his politics are bunk, and are not good for pain medicine.
 
Got to scrub in with Ben Carson years ago on a combined Peds Neurosurgery/Plastics case. Was standing literally elbow to elbow with him for hours. One of the nicest, unpretentious, unassuming surgeons I've ever had the pleasure of knowing. Couldn't care less about his religious views. He's got my vote if he runs.

Sorry SSdoc33 and lonelobo.....think that this goes a lot further than your conjecture regarding Dr. Carson
 
Top