He has NOT announced his candidacy, but rather hinted at it.
Billary has no chance if he runs. Billary would only get some of the socialist and a lot of the female vote (sadly; I'd like to think they'd vote based on policies vs. sex and I hope to be proven wrong, will be interesting to see % of women that vote for Billary).
He will get 100% of the racist voters that voted for Obama based on skin color vs. content of character, which is a huge percent of the Democratic party. They will be duped into voting for a libertarian. It will be oh so sweet to see that happen. Idiots. "Wait...what? You mean I just voted for a Republican...DOH!"
The Democratic race card spin machine will loose its legs and be exposed for the lie that it is. The only thing they could spin against him is that he is christian, male, heterosexual. They can't really spin his lack of political experience either, as Comrade Obama had only 2 years of experience in the Senate and he is a lowlife politician, not a freaking pediatric neurosurgeon who has contributed something of value to this world.
He will get the libertarian and republican vote.
He will get the thinking voters vote.
He's the ideal candidate. I'd trust a physician as president over some lowlife career politician any day.
If he ran with Rand Paul it would be so sweet! Paul is also a physician, don't forget (Ophthalmologist).
His weakness:
1. Keep religion out of his candidacy. Religion belongs out of politics. All politicians should keep their traps shut about this issue.
2. He better keep his pro-life stance out of the candidacy as well. A president should have nothing to do with pregnant women. The Presidents job is to deal with foreign relations and defense, not the womb.
3. That he does not believe in evolution is slightly worrisome, but I don't care as whether any candidate believes in evolution vs. creationism has zero bearing on their qualifications as President. I don't see how such a believe could affect any Presidential decision making.