SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads) I have designed a schedule where I can finish in 2 more years, letting me finish on time (4 years of undergrad), or where I would finish in an extra year (5 years of undergraduate) with a more lenient schedule. I would like to know which is the better choice to follow through with. Attached excel file is made up of two schedules I have created for myself. One being made up of two years where I would be taking a huge load of classes, or the other where it is split up into 3 years instead of 2. The initials GFA means history art class, GSB means intro anthropology, GLT means literature, diversity may be plant or zoology, & lvl 500 bio just means it is at the highest level class I'm required to take in biology. An example may be topics in biology, or advanced genetics. I also left a summer for shadowing in the extra year of summer which i figured would be the perfect time to do so, but I could somehow manage to work that in my 2 year schedule with enough planning. Guidance, advise, and/or any kind of help would be very much appreciated.