High-intensity focused ultrasound

Discussion in 'Radiation Oncology' started by probiotic, 09.20.11.

  1. SDN is made possible through member donations, sponsorships, and our volunteers. Learn about SDN's nonprofit mission.
  1. probiotic

    probiotic 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    07.25.11
    Messages:
    16
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    Hello everyone
    is high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) a rad onc procedure. Any ideas?
     
  2. SDN Members don't see this ad. About the ads.
  3. seper

    seper 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    12.22.10
    Messages:
    578
    Ouch!
    That thing hurts.
     
  4. medgator

    medgator Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    09.20.04
    Messages:
    2,210
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    Verified
    Physician
    Nope. It's done by urologists. Also, it is not FDA-approved to be performed in this country for the management of prostate cancer, so urologists have to fly down to the carribean to do it.
     
  5. Sheldor

    Sheldor 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    05.21.11
    Messages:
    1,070
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    It's also being explored for treatment of uterine fibroids by IR, but not here in the US. It's also being explored as a tool for tumor ablation, which would be in addition to the RF ablation that IR already does.

    If you're curious about more you can check out the Focused Ultrasound Surgery Foundation.
     
    Last edited: 09.20.11
  6. Gfunk6

    Gfunk6 And to think . . . I hesitated Lifetime Donor SDN Moderator 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    04.15.04
    Messages:
    3,241
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    Verified
    Physician
    Verified
    PhD
    Verified
    Faculty
    The Radiation Oncology department at UVA performs MRI focused ultrasound to treat cancer and has federal funding to investigate this technology.
     
  7. Werg

    Werg Medical Physics 2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    03.24.09
    Messages:
    66
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    I thought HIFU was FDA cleared for uterine fibroids.
     
  8. Sheldor

    Sheldor 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    05.21.11
    Messages:
    1,070
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    Not last time I was at a conference dealing with it, but admittedly that was a little while ago now. Back then the MR guided HIFU was being used in Europe but not here. Perhaps it is now approved?

    Edit to add: So I looked it up and it seems that the Exablate was approved for MR guided HIFU for uterine fibroids back in 2004.

    http://http://www.fda.gov/medicalde...rances/recently-approveddevices/ucm080704.htm
     
    Last edited: 09.22.11
  9. Sheldor

    Sheldor 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    05.21.11
    Messages:
    1,070
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    Here is some more information about HIFU:

    http://http://www.fusfoundation.org/Treatment-Sites/treatment-locations

    Based on what's I've seen of these machines it seems like the administration could easily fall under the scope of practice of radiation oncology. The planning software is similar, and an understanding of tumor volume and dosing is also required. It will be interesting to see where it goes over the next decade, but it sure seems to me that rad oncs should attempt to be the ones to administer it.
     
  10. JumpingFrenchmn

    JumpingFrenchmn 2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    12.02.09
    Messages:
    64
    Status:
    Medical Student
    Certainly sounds like "therapeutic radiology" to me :p
     
  11. Seldon1985

    Seldon1985 2+ Year Member

    Joined:
    08.17.10
    Messages:
    281
    Sorry to resurrect an older thread, but I was wondering how HIFU treatments were evolving in the clinical world. There were a couple of Rad Onc programs I interviewed at last year (forget which ones though) that made some mention of this modality in passing... Are Rad Onc departments yet trying to get into this line of "therapeutic radiology"?
     
  12. Sheldor

    Sheldor 5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    05.21.11
    Messages:
    1,070
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
  13. medgator

    medgator Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    09.20.04
    Messages:
    2,210
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    Verified
    Physician
    No mention of the amount of F/U in the study, but most of the endpoints in the abstract appear to measured at 12 months. Definitely more F/U needed than that for something like localized prostate CA

    http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70121-3/abstract

     
  14. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama I'm no Superman 7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    06.13.06
    Messages:
    9,389
    I don't know... It sounds kind of "interventional". :p
     

About the ads

Share This Page