- Joined
- Nov 27, 2002
- Messages
- 7,890
- Reaction score
- 752
* I reread the title and can see how that could be ambiguous. Let me clarify by saying I mean your patient's delusions, e.g. that they are the rightful King of Sweden or delusional parasitosis and so on. Not your own delusions that you will achieve career fulfillment, make a positive difference in the system and so on.
When you encounter patient with fixed delusions that are not dangerous how do you handle them? I mean things like non acute drug induced delusional parasitosis, Morgellans (which basically is the former), pseudocyesis and so on. I have been thinking of this since a patient I saw with delusion of retained foreign body.
I have found that challenging the delusion just results in agony for all involved. I use the approach of saying "We have determined that there is nothing dangerous going on right now so I'm discharging you." I have talked to people who feel it is unethical and/or bad medicine to not fully inform the patient of your assessment, i.e. unequivocally challenge the delusion.
Thoughts?
When you encounter patient with fixed delusions that are not dangerous how do you handle them? I mean things like non acute drug induced delusional parasitosis, Morgellans (which basically is the former), pseudocyesis and so on. I have been thinking of this since a patient I saw with delusion of retained foreign body.
I have found that challenging the delusion just results in agony for all involved. I use the approach of saying "We have determined that there is nothing dangerous going on right now so I'm discharging you." I have talked to people who feel it is unethical and/or bad medicine to not fully inform the patient of your assessment, i.e. unequivocally challenge the delusion.
Thoughts?