- Joined
- Jun 16, 2014
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
Just wondering, how much did the applications process cost for most of you?
Last edited:
After all was said and done I believe it cost me $1500 to apply to 6 schools. That's including VMCAS, all the supplemental apps, transcript orders, and GRE.Just wondering, how much did the applications process cost for most of you?
It cost me quite a bit more, I'd say in total around ~$2500. But only because I did way too many schools (11 total) and had to translate my GPA - I did a masters at a foreign institution in London, so I had to shell out nearly $500 or so to a translation service and then mail the transcript individually to each school (VMCAS doesn't process or verify any foreign transcripts). I also had quite a bit of fees in rush mail postages to all the colleges because I finished the course and got my transcript issued basically the day VMCAS closed (so I had to contact schools individually telling them my transcript would be coming late), and I was mailing everything from Europe so that added up. Honestly, I regret spending so much money applying everywhere. If you're worried about money, do your research, and only apply to schools that have admissions formulas that work to your benefit (I.e. if you have a weak GPA, choose a school that evaluates more heavily on other aspects of the application, etc). It will also save you so much time in completing supplemental applications!
So if you're trying to plan ahead on costs, here's a good breakdown:
- VMCAS Fees - VMCAS fee is about $200 for one school, and an additional $100 for each additional school. (Click here for the 2014/2015 fee chart).
- GRE Score Reports - You get to send 4 free reports to schools you designate at the time of taking the test. Additional score reports are $27 per school.
- Supplemental fees - Each school you apply to might have an additional supplemental fee. Just check their websites. Sometimes it's free, other times I remember it ranging from about $50 - $100 at some of the schools.
- Transcript fees - Whatever your schools charges for transcripts to be sent. Send it in early to VMCAS (the deadline is before the actual deadline) because they verify the grades on it.
- Translation services - Only needed if you did any coursework abroad that you want counted. I used World Education Services, there's a couple out there and so you can take a look at specific schools to see what their regulations or recommendations are.
Wow....I may have to reconsider narrowing down my list of schools to apply to
How much did flights cost roundtrip for those who went on interviews? I want to be prepared financially for this year.....
It's hard to estimate. Flights depend on time of year, where you're flying from, and where you're flying to. For me, a round trip ticket from Michigan to Gainesville was $500 in February, including my connection from ATL to GNV. Luckily, that was the only school I had to fly to. It doesn't seem like any schools interview too close to the holidays (Thanksgiving, Christmas) which would jack up flights. However, with the change of deadlines for this year, I wouldn't be surprised if schools start interviewing a little earlier as well. If you have any close family with hotel rewards, ask them if you could use their points for a room.Wow....I may have to reconsider narrowing down my list of schools to apply to
How much did flights cost roundtrip for those who went on interviews? I want to be prepared financially for this year.....
Wow....I may have to reconsider narrowing down my list of schools to apply to
How much did flights cost roundtrip for those who went on interviews? I want to be prepared financially for this year.....
Thanks everyone!! It is a big pill to swallow, but I think the best thing to do it to apply to 4 schools instead of 7 this year. My biggest fear is not getting into any schools and spending a ton of money on applications when I could use that money to improve my application for the next application cycle. I'm sure everyone feels that way though.
Thanks everyone!! It is a big pill to swallow, but I think the best thing to do it to apply to 4 schools instead of 7 this year.
Just wondering, how much did the applications process cost for most of you?
With a general acceptance/rejection statistic of 50/50, too many is the number at which you can no longer afford to eat/survive One just below that number, is exactly right But that's opinion and not objective fact (along with some sarcasm!)! You'll know what feels right.
I applied to 8 VMCAS schools and 1 non-VMCAS (Tufts). With purchasing/sending transcripts, VMCAS costs, application fees, supplemental application fees, hotels, gas (I didn't fly places I drove - for days!), GRE test, GRE scores, (and my sanity) - I believe I spent just over $3,000.
It's not cheap, and I think that's part of a way that they're able to control how many schools people apply to/weed out those that are not as committed. I'll admit it! I cried when I realized how much it cost, but it was worth it!!! With a general acceptance/rejection statistic of 50/50, too many is the number at which you can no longer afford to eat/survive One just below that number, is exactly right But that's opinion and not objective fact (along with some sarcasm!)! You'll know what feels right.
Plus don't forget, with the VMCAS you can always ADD schools to your application down to the last day. You cannot delete! Once you submit - even if you submit before September 1st - you can still add schools, but you cannot remove/alter. You cannot make changes after the application has closed.
Best of luck!!
Most will list a minimum GPA.Do any schools list the range of GPA of their accepted students? I haven't came across that yet, I've only seen the averages. My undergrad overall GPA is below average for accepted students, but I'm trying to compensate that with getting a masters and other factors.
Do any schools list the range of GPA of their accepted students? I haven't came across that yet, I've only seen the averages. My undergrad overall GPA is below average for accepted students, but I'm trying to compensate that with getting a masters and other factors.
Do any schools list the range of GPA of their accepted students? I haven't came across that yet, I've only seen the averages. My undergrad overall GPA is below average for accepted students, but I'm trying to compensate that with getting a masters and other factors.
I think that's a smart move. I'm of the opinion - there are a number of people who disagree with me - that if you really do your research you should be able to whittle down the application list to only schools you actually have a legit decent chance of getting accepted. Plus maybe one 'dream school' if the COA isn't stupid compared to the others. And if you've done that research and picked appropriate schools, you shouldn't need to apply to 7 to hope to get an acceptance - that just says to me that the applicant hasn't done enough research. I sorta feel that people who want a bunch of admission offers to 'pick between' are being silly. You can only go to one school; might as well only apply to schools you want to (or are at least willing to) attend. But like I said, there are plenty of people who disagree with me and think the 'shotgun approach' makes more sense. I just think it's a waste of money.
I think that's easy to say when you're not from a state that either has no vet school/contract seat or an IS with ridiculously high COA. If you're in that situation though, any school that accepts a good number of OOS students that fits your general criteria becomes fair game... and I don't think it's outrageous to apply to like 6-8 schools.
I mean you don't really know until you apply whether you're someone who will be getting a ton of interview invites or hordes of waitlists. If you start getting a bunch of interview invites, you can always decline them, and you're only out the cost of applications and ancillary paperwork fees... which in the grand scheme of things is a drop in the bucket, and much cheaper than needing to reapply the next year. I agree though that if you don't get in anywhere when applying to like 6+ schools, then you probably wouldn't have gotten in applying to more (provided you aren't applying to island schools or new schools).
School "reputation" didn't mean jack squat to me since in the big picture, it is me who makes the opportunities and gets myself hired, not the name of the school I attended.
The world at my fingertips.Geez, I've already given you a job. What more do you want?
I disagree that you don't really have any idea how you'll do. You might not, but if so it's because you haven't really done the research.
I disagree. Take my 3 application cycles, here are some of what happened to me:
Western: Year 1: Interview, waitlisted. Year 2: Interview, rejected
Year 3: Didn't apply
Mississippi: Year 1: Didn't apply.
Year 2: interviewed, waitlisted
Year 3: Rejected outright, no interview
There were also others where I was rejected, interviews, waitlisted and it changed the following year.
I had no way to know that a school that previously waitlisted me would reject me the next year. Yes, I knew it was a possibility but I was still going to apply because previous experience and my research showed that I had a chance of being accepted.
I don't think it is just that you didn't do your research. We all know how awkward and random the application process can be.
There's no way anybody knows that a person with a 3.0 isn't going to get in at any particular school. I know people with higher GPAs and GREs that didn't get into MSU, but I did. I also know people with lower GPAs and GRE scores that got into UF (my IS), and I was straight up rejected. UF is supposed to be all about numbers, and someone with a relatively low GPA got in. My point is that nobody knows what goes on through the admissions committee's heads and that committees change every year so you can't say that someone doesn't have a chance at all. Are the chances small? Probably, but you still can't say it's a definite no.You did the research though. There are people who plan on applying to schools that they have no chance of getting into, and just a little bit of research would tell them that. Someone just posted on "what are my chances" that they have a 3.0 and are planning on applying to NCSU, Penn and CO, among others. There's no way they're getting into those schools - so what's the point of spending that money?
There's no way anybody knows that a person with a 3.0 isn't going to get in at any particular school. I know people with higher GPAs and GREs that didn't get into MSU, but I did. I also know people with lower GPAs and GRE scores that got into UF (my IS), and I was straight up rejected. UF is supposed to be all about numbers, and someone with a relatively low GPA got in. My point is that nobody knows what goes on through the admissions committee's heads and that committees change every year so you can't say that someone doesn't have a chance at all. Are the chances small? Probably, but you still can't say it's a definite no.
You did the research though. There are people who plan on applying to schools that they have no chance of getting into, and just a little bit of research would tell them that. Someone just posted on "what are my chances" that they have a 3.0 and are planning on applying to NCSU, Penn and CO, among others. There's no way they're getting into those schools - so what's the point of spending that money?
I disagree. Take my 3 application cycles, here are some of what happened to me:
Western: Year 1: Interview, waitlisted. Year 2: Interview, rejected
Year 3: Didn't apply
Mississippi: Year 1: Didn't apply.
Year 2: interviewed, waitlisted
Year 3: Rejected outright, no interview
There were also others where I was rejected, interviews, waitlisted and it changed the following year.
I had no way to know that a school that previously waitlisted me would reject me the next year. Yes, I knew it was a possibility but I was still going to apply because previous experience and my research showed that I had a chance of being accepted.
I don't think it is just that you didn't do your research. We all know how awkward and random the application process can be.
Yes, but LIS is putting out a broad statement
Now maybe LIS meant that you should apply to those schools you feel (not know) you will have a good chance of getting accepted to. But stating that people should "know" how they will do is just too big a blanket statement with the (apparent) randomness that these applications can be at times.
I didn't say you "know" how you will do. You're rephrasing my point inappropriately. I said you should have "an idea" how you will do. As in, a pretty good sense of whether you have a good chance. Obviously nobody ever "knows" whether they will get an acceptance or not at a given institution.
At least, I don't think I said you "know" how you will do. That's your choice of words, not mine, I think.
It is absolutely false to say that if you "don't have any idea how you'll do" then "you haven't done your research". Clearly nobody will know how anyone will do. At all. And it is a bit extreme to make that big of a blanket statement on applying to vet school. Heck we might as well change the "what are my chances thread" to "we will tell you if you will be accepted and where" if people should "know" how they are going to do.
Saying that someone is unlikely to get into certain schools is not the same as saying they definitely will get into others.
I never said that it was the same.
I just feel like that's where the sticking point is. LIS was saying that it's in most people's best interest to research what schools they are applying to and make sure they're a good fit with a reasonable expectation of success. You're saying that, even with that research, there's no way to know for sure. I feel like both statements are true. You can match a schools successful applicant profile and still not get in, and there seems to be no rhyme or reason why since it can change from year to year. But there are also applicants that are very, very unlikely to get into certain schools, and applying to a lot of them isn't going to change that.
Yes, I've already agreed that LIS and I were talking about different points. I've also already stated that I mostly agree with him. So I'm really not sure of your point posting this, unless you're looking for something else? Seems unnecessary to restate all of this.
I must have confused this for an open forum.
It is but you're replying directly to me. As if I disagree with all of that. So I guess I just don't get your point in your response to me. You've made points to me directly twice that are just repeating what I've said. So I'm really not sure I'm understanding your responses. Unless you are just making commentary but it comes across as if you're trying to get me to understand something.