- Joined
- Jul 27, 2013
- Messages
- 38,497
- Reaction score
- 75,457
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/o...-in-admissions-essays.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0
This article is about Ivy League applicants, but many of the same concepts still apply to medical school.
"THE Yale applicant had terrific test scores. She had fantastic grades. As one of Yale’s admissions officers, Michael Motto, leafed through her application, he found himself more and more impressed.
Then he got to her essay. As he remembers it, she mentioned a French teacher she greatly admired. She described their one-on-one conversation at the end of a school day. And then, this detail: During their talk, when an urge to go to the bathroom could no longer be denied, she decided not to interrupt the teacher or exit the room. She simply urinated on herself.
Ah, The Secretary approach to the personal statement. Unique, I'll giver her that, but certainly not winning her any points.
“He wrote about his genitalia, and how he was under-endowed,” Motto told me. “He was going for something about masculinity and manhood, and how he had to get over certain things.”"
Writing about how you have to live with the adversity of a lilliputian penis evidently doesn't count as "diversity" or "hardship" to adcoms. Aside from the whole "writing an essay that alludes to how I'll hit the gym incessantly and one day have to purchase a Corvette in a form of sad overcompensation" aspect of it.
"Motto said that one Yale applicant “actually described himself as one of the world’s great Casanovas” and said that his amazing looks inspired envy in other boys and competition among girls vying for his affection."
I almost want to get into admissions someday just so I can see some of the hilarious essays that come through. I guess the moral of the story is: no matter how brilliant you believe your personal statement to be, have a few eyes take a look at it before you submit. Because you might think it's the best idea ever, but there might be some glaring flaw you've overlooked because you got so lost in the writing process.
This article is about Ivy League applicants, but many of the same concepts still apply to medical school.
"THE Yale applicant had terrific test scores. She had fantastic grades. As one of Yale’s admissions officers, Michael Motto, leafed through her application, he found himself more and more impressed.
Then he got to her essay. As he remembers it, she mentioned a French teacher she greatly admired. She described their one-on-one conversation at the end of a school day. And then, this detail: During their talk, when an urge to go to the bathroom could no longer be denied, she decided not to interrupt the teacher or exit the room. She simply urinated on herself.
Ah, The Secretary approach to the personal statement. Unique, I'll giver her that, but certainly not winning her any points.
“He wrote about his genitalia, and how he was under-endowed,” Motto told me. “He was going for something about masculinity and manhood, and how he had to get over certain things.”"
Writing about how you have to live with the adversity of a lilliputian penis evidently doesn't count as "diversity" or "hardship" to adcoms. Aside from the whole "writing an essay that alludes to how I'll hit the gym incessantly and one day have to purchase a Corvette in a form of sad overcompensation" aspect of it.
"Motto said that one Yale applicant “actually described himself as one of the world’s great Casanovas” and said that his amazing looks inspired envy in other boys and competition among girls vying for his affection."
I almost want to get into admissions someday just so I can see some of the hilarious essays that come through. I guess the moral of the story is: no matter how brilliant you believe your personal statement to be, have a few eyes take a look at it before you submit. Because you might think it's the best idea ever, but there might be some glaring flaw you've overlooked because you got so lost in the writing process.