I'm not saying stats don't matter, just that aspects of the application can overcome lower stats. And yes, UVA does read the entire application before they decide whether or not to offer an interview.
Think again. From what they told us at interviews, both Michigan and Pitt read through the applications before offering interviews.
Right, I completely agree that they read the whole application. They read the whole application because you have to read the application to get to the section where AAMC lists MCAT scores and GPA. Maybe they don't use a computer to screen, but even when an individual reads an application, psychologically the stats stick in the back of their mind and they assess the application with the notion of high stats or low stats.
Try it yourself:
A) 100 hours of volunteering, 3 years of research (with no mention of independent work...just doing a post doc's dirty work), study abroad in the Middle East, and went to Yale
B) started an organization that databases organ donations, raised $10,000 to fund medical missions to West Africa, 4 years of research (with 2nd author publication), National Awards galore (the BIG ones too), 4 years of hospice volunteering, and intramural baseball for 4 years (captain), went Ohio State University
Who do you like? B? Yeah me too....
Now put this in the back of your mind:
A) 3.68 (science and cumulative)
FROM YALE and 37 MCAT
B) 3.94 from ohio state and an
unbalanced 30 MCAT
Now who do you like? Fair or not, B is out of the race. A most likely made it past this review and on to the interview. How do I know this? Well, let's just say I'm drawing on experience here. Say whatever you like, but stats factor in the most whether it is right or wrong.