6
625233
I need as many tips as possible please. I opted out of taking bio 1/2 in college because of IB credits. When should I take the Princeton review? Before self study or after?
WeRunThis
WeRunThis
Take the course during your self-study. Opting out of Bio 1/2 because of IB credits is a bit of a tricky situation. You want to be sure you give yourself ample time to study for this exam, especially if you hadn't taken Bio in years.
I'm no genius and I scored a 35. It's more about a lot of hard work, thinking logically, and test-taking ability than it is about innate intelligence.1. Be a Genius.
2. Be a Genius.
3. BE A GENIUS!!!!
You people are all crazy if you don't think substantial intelligence is required for scoring 95th+ percentile among the demographic that takes the MCAT. It's cool that you guys are so humble and all, but its dishonest to tell someone all that's needed is a good work ethic and lots of practice to make a 35.
I would imagine that nearly every person applying to medical school has taken multiple rigorous college courses and done at least decently well in them in order to even be considering medical school. Most of us have at least decent science GPAs (3.3+) and that means we've mastered a lot of this material in undergrad courses. The material on the MCAT is nothing new and nearly everyone taking it has already learned it at least once. I think anyone who wants to (barring legitimate mental disability) can get a 35+.
Sorry to be so blunt... but I believe if you didn't get the score you wanted, you either didn't work hard enough or you didn't work efficiently enough.
I would imagine that nearly every person applying to medical school has taken multiple rigorous college courses and done at least decently well in them in order to even be considering medical school. Most of us have at least decent science GPAs (3.3+) and that means we've mastered a lot of this material in undergrad courses. The material on the MCAT is nothing new and nearly everyone taking it has already learned it at least once. I think anyone who wants to (barring legitimate mental disability) can get a 35+.
Sorry to be so blunt... but I believe if you didn't get the score you wanted, you either didn't work hard enough or you didn't work efficiently enough.
Your argument actually runs contrary to your conclusion I think. The majority of test takers scoring 80th percentile and up are very experienced with the material, hardworking, and most of them spent months preparing. What separates a 39 from a 33 isn't more time studying or study effeciency, it's ability to nail the curveball passages/questions which test your ability to understand and manipulate new information at high speeds, the very definition of fluid intelligence (especially in verbal).
There's a huge difference between a 35 and a 39. I do NOT think that hard work, and the like, can get anyone a 39. I DO think that it can get pretty much anyone a 35 though. So, in response to your point, you're right. What separates a 39 from a 33 isn't more time, etc. However, what separates a 35 from a 33 is time, hard work and efficiency.
You people are all crazy if you don't think substantial intelligence is required for scoring 95th+ percentile among the demographic that takes the MCAT. It's cool that you guys are so humble and all, but its dishonest to tell someone all that's needed is a good work ethic and lots of practice to make a 35.
The demographic taking the MCAT has already been hugely selective for for intelligent people, and getting in the top 5% of that group requires you to be well above average intelligence. A 13/10/12 is 97th/85th/95th percentiles, you do not get there just by practicing and memorizing a lot. The MCAT sciences absolutely test critical thinking, very few of the questions are purely knowledge based and they are answered correctly by most test takers. You people spend too much time on SDN if you think anybody with a good work ethic can get above 30, let alone a 35+.
Average intelligence is all you need for a 97/95th percentile science performance against all people who survived weed out...what even is this thread...
I agree with the premise but I disagree with the cutoff point.
I think if you really study hard, a person of average intelligence can get a 35+. I believe verbal is basically like a limiting factor in your performance that cannot really be improved. But getting a 13/10/12 breakdown is possible for most people. The MCAT science sections do not test intense critical thinking. If you know the concepts well (AAMC tests the concepts in unfamiliar settings but the principles are relatively basic), you can score 12/13 or better.
I think at upper 30s and 40 is where innate intelligence starts to become limiting - mostly because you basically need a good verbal score at this point.
There are many recipes for getting a 35+. Some work better for some people than others. Check the sticky for people who got a 30+ and then focus on the replies from people who say they got 35+. This way you can find a method that works for you.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/30-mcat-study-habits-the-cbt-version.503250/